Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:23:34.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Organizational Perspective of Corruption1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Yadong Luo
Yadong Luo*
Affiliation:
School of Business Administration, University of Miami, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An organizational view of corruption is a frontier and challenging issue in the realm of management and organization research. This article elucidates four interrelated yet sequential issues that collectively constitute organizational explanations of corruption: (i) corruption and organizational environment; (ii) corruption and organizational behaviour; (iii) corruption and organizational consequences; and (iv) corruption and organizational architecture. Specifically, it (1) offers taxonomic metaphors that identify different corrupt organizations on the basis of corruption scale and hierarchical involvement; (2) defines task environments (oligopoly intensity, regulatory control and structural uncertainly) and institutional environments (opaqueness, injustice and complexity) that stimulate illicit acts; (3) confers a typology of corrupt behaviors that align with these task and institutional environments and correspond to different metaphors (system malfeasance, procedural malfeasance, categorical malfeasance and structural malfeasance); (4) develops the logic that corruption impedes organizational development through quadri-damages (evolutionary hazard, strategic impediment, competitive disadvantage and organizational deficiency; and (5) illuminates a corruption-resisting architecture comprising corporate culture, organizational structure and compliance system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 119 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

The author would like to thank Professor John Child and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable inputs.

References

Ackerman, S. R. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4, 187–203.Google Scholar
Ackerman, S. R. (1978). Corruption: A study in Political Economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, S. R. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, S. R. (2001). ‘Trust and honesty in post-socialist societies’. Kyklos, 54, 415–44.Google Scholar
Argandona, A. (2003). ‘Private-to-private corruption’. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 253–67.Google Scholar
Banfield, E. C. (1975). ‘Corruption as a feature of government organization’. Journal of Law and Economics, 18, 587–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages’. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baucus, M. (1994). ‘Pressure, opportunity, and predisposition: A multivariate model of corporate illegality’. Journal of Management, 10, 699–721.Google Scholar
Bunker, S. G. and Cohen, L. E. (1983). ‘Collaboration and competition in two colonization projects: Toward a general theory of official corruption’. Human Organization, 42, 106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T. and Flam, H. (1986). The shaping of social organization: Social rule system theory and its applications. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Child, J. (1972). ‘Organizational structure, environment and performance. The role of strategic choice’. Sociology, 6, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conference Board, The (2000). Company programs for resisting corrupt practices: A global study. Research Report 1279-00-RR, New York: The Conference Board.Google Scholar
Dess, G. G. and Beard, D. W. (1984). ‘Dimensions of organizational task environments’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W. W. (1983). ‘The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organization fields’. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–60.Google Scholar
Doig, A. and Theobald, R. (2000). Corruption and democratization. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. MA: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Geletkanycz, M. A. and Hambrick, D. C. (1997). ‘The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 654–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M. and Corley, K. G. (2000). ‘Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability’. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81.Google Scholar
Global Corruption Report 2001. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, A. A. (1999). ‘Slapping the grasping hand: Correlates of political corruption in emerging markets’. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(4), 866–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. A. and Tyler, B. (1991). ‘Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives’. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 327–51.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. and Terry, D. J. (2000). ‘Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts’. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–40.Google Scholar
Husted, B. W. (1999). ‘Wealth, culture, and corruption’. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S., Kaufman, D. and Lobaton, P. Z. (1998). ‘Regulatory discretion and the unofficial economy’. American Economic Review, 88(2), 387–92.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Lobaton, P. Z. (1999). ‘Governance matters’. World Bank Policy Research Paper, no. 2196, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lambsdorff, J. G. (2002). ‘Making corrupt deals: Contracting in the shadow of the law’. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48, 221–41.Google Scholar
Lambsdorff, J. G. (1999). ‘Corruption in international research: A review’. Transparency International Working Paper, Berlin, www.transparency.de (accessed 10 November 2000).Google Scholar
LaPalombra, J. (1994). ‘Structural and institutional aspects of corruption’. Social Research, LXI, 325–50.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. and Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2002a). ‘Corruption and organization in Asian management systems’. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 405–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y. (2002b). Multinational enterprises in emerging markets. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958). Organization. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mauro, P. (1995). ‘Corruption and growth’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes’. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–79.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G. (1983). ‘The federation as an interorganizational linkage network’. Academy of Management Review, 8, 79–89.Google Scholar
Schleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W (1993). ‘Corruption’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1972). Comparative political corruption. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. (1998). ‘Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures’. IMF Working Paper 98/63. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Tool, M. R. (1993). Institutional economics: Theory, method, and policy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, D. (2000). ‘The causes of corruption: A cross national study’. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushman, M. and Nadler, D. (1978). ‘Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design’. Academy of Management Review, 3, 613–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of State (2001). Fighting global corruption: Business risk management. Washington, D.C.:Department of State Publication 10731.Google Scholar
Wei, S-J. (2000). Natural openness and good government. MBER Working Paper 7765, www.nber.org.Google Scholar
Weaver, G., Trevino, L. and Cochran, P. (1999). ‘Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Managerial commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethical practices’. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. 1987. Political corruption in Africa. UK: Gower.Google Scholar