Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:02:10.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WEALTH INEQUALITY AND OPTIMAL MONETARY POLICY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2010

Ryoji Hiraguchi
Ryoji Hiraguchi*
Affiliation:
Ritsumeikan University
*
Address correspondence to: Ryoji Hiraguchi, 1-1-1, Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the money-in-the-utility-function model in which agents are heterogeneous in their initial wealth. We show that the Friedman rule is not optimal even if the government uses nonlinear income taxation for redistribution. A positive nominal interest rate raises social welfare because it relaxes the incentive compatibility constraint for highly endowed agents. Although the setup is close to that of da Costa and Werning [Journal of Political Economy (2008) 116, 82–112], who investigate skill heterogeneity, the role of the nominal interest rate in this paper here differs from the one in their model.

Keywords

Monetary PolicyPrivate InformationFriedman Rule
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , November 2010 , pp. 629 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albanesi, Stefania and Sleet, Christopher (2006) Dynamic optimal taxation with private information. Review of Economic Studies 73, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Franklin and Gale, Douglas (2004) Financial intermediaries and markets. Econometrica 72, 1023–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antinolfi, Gaetano, Azariadis, Costas, and Bullard, James (2007) The Optimal Inflation Target in an Economy with Limited Enforcement. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arseneau, David M. and Chugh, Sanjay K. (2008) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy with costly wage bargaining. Journal of Monetary Economics 55, 1401–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, Ben (2008) Remarks on Class Day 2008. The Federal Reserve Board.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Joydeep, Haslag, Joseph, and Martin, Antoine (2005) Heterogeneity, redistribution, and the Friedman rule. International Economic Review 46, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Joydeep, Haslag, Joseph, Martin, Antoine, and Singh, Rajesh (2008) Who is afraid of the Friedman rule? Economic Inquiry 46, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chari, V.V. and Kehoe, Patrick J. (1999) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy. In Taylor, John B. and Woodford, Michael (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics 1C, pp. 1671–1745. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremer, Helmuth, Pestieau, Pierre, and Rochet, Jean-Charles (2001) Direct versus indirect taxation: The design of the tax structure revisited. International Economic Review 42, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Costa, Carlos and Werning, Ivan (2008) On the optimality of the Friedman rule with heterogeneous agents and non-linear income taxation. Journal of Political Economy 116, 82–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nardi, Mariacristina, İmrohorŏglu, Selahattin, and Sargent, Thomas (1999) Projected U.S. demographics and Social Security. Review of Economic Dynamics 2, 575–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Udo (1992) A reexamination of the optimal nonlinear income tax. Journal of Public Economics 49, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Penalosa, Cecilia and Turnovsky, Stephen (2007) Growth, income inequality, and fiscal policy: What are the relevant tradeoffs? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 39, 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heer, Burkhard (2003) Welfare costs of inflation in a dynamic economy with search unemployment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, Peter (2005) Heterogeneity and redistribution: By monetary or fiscal means? International Economic Review 46, 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Yi (2009) A note on inflation, growth, and income inequality. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocherlakota, Narayana (2005) Optimal monetary policy: What we know and what we don't know. International Economic Review 46, 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljungqvist, Lars and Sargent, Thomas (2001) Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mehrling, Perry G. (1995) A note on the optimum quantity of money. Journal of Mathematical Economics 24, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirrlees, James A. (1976) Optimal tax theory: A synthesis. Journal of Public Economics 6, 327–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palivos, Theodore (2005) Optimal monetary policy with heterogeneous agents: A case for inflation. Oxford Economic Papers 57, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohe, Stephanie and Uribe, Martin (2004) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy under imperfect competition. Journal of Macroeconomics 26, 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar