Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:06:29.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE TIMING OF TAX COLLECTIONS AND THE STRUCTURE OF “IRRELEVANCE” THEOREMS IN A CASH-IN-ADVANCE MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Thomas J. Sargent  and
Bruce D. Smith
Thomas J. Sargent*
Affiliation:
Hoover Institution, Stanford University and New York University
Bruce D. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Texas
*
Address correspondence to: Thomas J. Sargent, Economics Department, New York University, 19 W. 4th Street, 6th floor, New York, NY 10012, USA; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A standard timing protocol in a cash-in-advance model allows the government to elude the inflation tax. That matters. Altering the timing of tax collections to make the government hold cash overnight disables some classical propositions but enables others. The altered timing protocol loses a Ricardian proposition and also the proposition that open market operations, accompanied by tax adjustments needed to finance the change in interest on bonds due the public, are equivalent to pure units changes. The altered timing enables a Modigliani–Miller equivalence proposition that does not otherwise prevail.

Keywords

Ricardian EquivalenceQuantity Theory of MoneyModigliani–Miller Theorem
Type
Vintage Article
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , September 2010 , pp. 585 - 603
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bresciani-Turroni, C. (1937) The Economics of Inflation. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E. James (1961) The Power of the Purse. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Helpman, Elhanan and Razin, Assaf (1985) “Floating Exchange Rates with Liquidity Constraints in Financial Markets,” Journal of International Economics 19 (1/2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr., (1980) Equilibrium in a pure currency economy. In Kareken, John and Wallace, Neil (eds.), Models of Monetary Economies, pp. 131–146. Minneapolis, MN: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr., (1982) Interest rates and currency prices in a two-country world. Journal of Monetary Economics 10, 335–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr., (1984) Money in a theory of finance. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 21, 9–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr., (1987) Models of Business Cycles. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. Jr., and Stokey, Nancy L. (1987) Money and interest in a cash-in-advance economy. Econometrica 55 (3), 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargent, Thomas J. (1987) Dynamic Macroeconomic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sargent, Thomas J. and Smith, Bruce (1987) Irrelevance of open market operations in some economies with government currency being dominated in rate of return. American Economic Review 77 (1), 78–92.Google Scholar
Svensson, L.E.O. (1985) Money and asset prices in a cash-in-advance economy. Journal of Political Economy 93, 919–944.Google Scholar
Wallace, Neil (1981) A Modigliani–Miller theorem for open market operations. American Economic Review 71 (3), 267–274.Google Scholar