Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:28:20.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE TIME-VARYING EFFECTS OF PERMANENT AND TRANSITORY SHOCKS TO REAL OUTPUT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2014

John W. Keating  and
Victor J. Valcarcel
John W. Keating*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Victor J. Valcarcel
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University
*
Address correspondence to: John W. Keating, Economics Department, 334 Snow Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA; e-mail: [email protected]; URL: http://www.people.ku.edu/jkeating/.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A time-varying-parameter VAR for real output growth and inflation is estimated with annual U.S. series dating back to 1870. Volatility for both variables rises quickly with World War I and its aftermath, stays high until the end of World War II, and drops rapidly until the 1960s. This Postwar Moderation yields the largest decline in volatilities, surpassing the Great Moderation. Conditional on temporary shocks, inflation and output growth are positively correlated. Our model implies that aggregate demand played a key role in inflation volatility fluctuations. Conversely, the two variables are negatively correlated conditional on permanent shocks. Our model suggests that aggregate supply played an important role in output volatility fluctuations. Most impulse responses support an aggregate supply interpretation for permanent shocks. However, before World War I, a permanent increase in output raised the price level at longer horizons, and these responses are frequently statistically significant. This evidence supports the hypothesis that aggregate demand had a long-run positive effect on output during the pre–World War I period.

Keywords

The Great ModerationThe Postwar ModerationStochastic VolatilityPermanent–Transitory DecompositionsMarkov Chain Monte CarloStructural Vector Autoregression
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , April 2015 , pp. 477 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrés, J., Doménech, R., and Fatás, A. (2008) The stabilizing role of government size. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 32, 571–593Google Scholar
Balke, N. and Gordon, R. (1989) The estimation of prewar gross national product: Methodology and new evidence. Journal of Political Economy 97 (1), 38–92.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T. and Eichengreen, B. (1994) Macroeconomic adjustment under Bretton Woods and the post-Bretton Woods float: An impulse response analysis. Economic Journal 104, 813–827.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T. and Taylor, M.P. (1995) Macroeconomic shocks, the ERM and tri-polarity. Review of Economics and Statistics 77, 321–331.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O.J. and Quah, D. (1989) The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79 (4), 655–673.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O.J. and Simon, J. (2001) The long and large decline in U.S. output volatility. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2001–1, 187–207.Google Scholar
Bordo, M.D. (1993) The gold standard, Bretton Woods and other monetary regimes: A historical appraisal. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 75 (2), 123–191.Google Scholar
Burren, D. and Neusser, K. (2012) The role of sectoral shifts in the decline of real GDP volatility. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17 (3), 1–24.Google Scholar
Carter, C.K. and Kohn, R. (1994) On Gibbs sampling for state space models. Biometrica 81 (3), 541–553.Google Scholar
Clarida, R., Galí, J., and Gertler, M., M. (2000) Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: Evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 147–180.Google Scholar
Clark, T.E. (2009) Is the Great Moderation over? An empirical analysis. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (4), 5–42.Google Scholar
Clark, T.E. and Davig, T. (2011) Decomposing the declining volatility of long-term inflation expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35 (7), 981–999.Google Scholar
Cogley, T. and Sargent, T.J. (2001) Evolving post World War II U.S. inflation dynamics. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 16, 331–373.Google Scholar
Cogley, T. and Sargent, T.J. (2005) Drifts and volatilities: Monetary policies and outcomes in the post WWII U.S. Review of Economic Dynamics 8, 262–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, J.P., Enders, W., and Hueng, C.J. (2006) Using the aggregate demand–aggregate supply model to identify structural demand-side and supply-side shocks: Results using a bivariate VAR. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 38, 777–790.Google Scholar
Davis, S.J. and Kahn, J.A. (2008) Interpreting the Great Moderation: Changes in the volatility of economic activity at the macro and micro levels. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 2 (4), 155–180.Google Scholar
Faust, J. and Leeper, E.M. (1997) When do long-run identifying restrictions give reliable results? Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15 (3), 345–353.Google Scholar
Fernández-Villaverde, J., Rubio-Ramírez, J.F., Sargent, T.J., and Watson, M.W. (2007) ABCs (and Ds) of understanding VARs. American Economic Review 97 (3), 1021–1026.Google Scholar
Galí, J. and Gambetti, L. (2009) On the sources of the Great Moderation. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1 (1), 26–57.Google Scholar
Gambetti, L., Pappa, E., and Canova, F. (2008) The structural dynamics of U.S. output and inflation: What explains the changes? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40, 369–388.Google Scholar
Gil-Alana, L.A. and Moreno, A. (2009) Technology shocks and hours worked: A fractional integration perspective. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 580–604.Google Scholar
Gospodinov, N. (2010) Inference in nearly nonstationary SVAR models with long-run identifying restrictions. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 28 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Herrera, A.M. and Pesavento, E. (2009) Oil price shocks, systematic monetary policy and the Great Moderation. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13, 107–137.Google Scholar
Jacquier, E., Polson, N.G., and Rossi, P.E. (1994) Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12, 371–389.Google Scholar
Karras, G. (1994) Aggregate demand and supply shocks in Europe: 1860–1987. Journal of European Economic History 22, 79–98.Google Scholar
Keating, J.W. (2013) Interpreting permanent shocks to output when aggregate demand may not be neutral in the long run. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45 (4), 747–756.Google Scholar
Keating, J.W. and Nye, J.V. (1998) Permanent and transitory shocks in real output: Estimates from nineteenth-century and postwar economies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 30 (2), 231–251.Google Scholar
Keating, J.W. and Valcarcel, V. (2012a) Greater Moderations. Economics Letters 115 (2), 168–171.Google Scholar
Keating, J.W. and Valcarcel, V. (2012b) What's So Great about the Great Moderation? A Multi-country Investigation of Time-Varying Volatilities of Output Growth and Inflation. University of Kansas working paper series, 20124.Google Scholar
McConnell, M.M. and Perez-Quiros, G.P. (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980s? American Economic Review 90, 1464–1476.Google Scholar
Minsky, H.P. (1982) Can “It” Happen Again: Essays on Instability and Finance. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.R. (2003) International Historical Statistics: The Americas, 1750–2000, 5th ed.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morley, J. (2011) The two interpretations of the Beveridge–Nelson decomposition. Macroeconomic Dynamics 15 (3), 419–439.Google Scholar
Moro, A. (2012) The structural transformation between manufacturing and services and the decline in the US GDP volatility. Review of Economic Dynamics 15 (3), 402–415Google Scholar
Nason, J.M. and Smith, G.W. (2008) Great Moderation(s) and U.S. interest rates: Unconditional evidence. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 8 (1) (Contributions), Article 30Google Scholar
Primiceri, G.E. (2005) Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Review of Economic Studies 72 (3), 821–852.Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. and Rogoff, K. (2011) This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, C.D. (1986) Is the stabilization of the postwar economy a figment of the data. American Economic Review 76, 314–334.Google Scholar
Romer, C.D. (1989) The prewar business cycle reconsidered: New estimates of Gross National Product, 1869–1908. Journal of Political Economy 97, 1–37.Google Scholar
Romer, C.D. (1999) Changes in business cycles: Evidence and explanations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (2), 23–44.Google Scholar
Sims, C. and Zha, T. (2006) Were there regime switches in monetary policy? American Economic Review 96 (1), 54–81.Google Scholar
Stock, J. and Watson, M. (2002) Has the business cycle changed and why? In Gertler, M. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 159–218. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
The Employment Act, Act of Feb. 20, 1946, ch. 33, section 2, 60 Stat. 23, 15 USC, §1021.Google Scholar
Tschernig, R., Weber, E., and Weigand, R. (2013) Long-run identification in a fractionally integrated system. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 31 (4), 438–450.Google Scholar
Weber, E. (2011) Analyzing U.S. output and the Great Moderation by simultaneous unobserved components. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43 (8), 1579–1597.Google Scholar