Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 July 2017
Most papers studying the impacts of technology adoption on income trajectories assume that firms adopt frontier technologies when available. If these technologies are skill intensive, less-developed economies may fail in successfully implementing them and may become trapped in a low-growth equilibrium. Within a Schumpeterian growth model, we show that differences in adoption barriers and incentives to the accumulation of skills produce differences in the technology level that is optimal to adopt. If the economy is not overly distorted, copying nonfrontier technologies helps compensating for the scarcity of skills and increases the likelihood of copying frontier technologies in the long run. If distortions are significant, it may be optimal to copy less-advanced technologies even in the long run. If adoption is not a skill-intensive activity, then copying frontier technologies is always optimal; all economies achieve a high-growth equilibrium and only income differences persist in the long run.
I would like to thank participants at the North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society and the EEA/ESEM Meetings. I would also like to thank Rodrigo Fuentes, Andrea Repetto, Raimundo Soto, the editor and one anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. I also acknowledge financial support from VRI-Inicio (INICIO 42/2014) and the National Fund for Science and Technology of Chile Fondecyt, grant number 1150433. The usual disclaimer applies.