Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:36:34.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE ROLE OF US-BASED FDI FLOWS FOR GLOBAL OUTPUT DYNAMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2017

Florian Huber
Affiliation:
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Manfred M. Fischer*
Affiliation:
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Philipp Piribauer
Affiliation:
Vienna University of Economics and Business and Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO)
*
Address correspondence to: Manfred M. Fischer, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Welthandelsplatz 1, Building D4, 1020 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

This paper uses a global vector autoregressive (GVAR) model to analyze the relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and output dynamics in a multicountry context. The GVAR model enables us to make two important contributions: First, to model international linkages among a large number of countries, which is a key asset given the diversity of countries involved, and second, to model foreign direct investment and output dynamics jointly. The country-specific small-dimensional vector autoregressive submodels are estimated utilizing a Bayesian version of the model coupled with stochastic search variable selection priors to account for model uncertainty. Using a sample of 15 emerging and advanced economies over the period 1998:Q1–2012:Q4, we find that US outbound FDI exerts a positive long-term effect on output. Asian and Latin American economies tend to react faster and also stronger than Western European countries. Forecast error variance decompositions indicate that FDI plays a prominent role in explaining gross domestic product fluctuations, especially in emerging market economies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Austrian National Bank, Jubiläumsfond grant no. 16249. We are indebted to Benedikt Sargant for excellent research support.

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, B. J. and Harrison, A. E. (1999) Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review 89 (3), 605618.Google Scholar
Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., and Sayek, S. (2004) FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics 64 (1), 89112.Google Scholar
Balasubramanyam, V. N., Salisu, M., and Sapsford, D. (1996) Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. Economic Journal 106 (434), 92105.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Pain, N. (1996) An econometric analysis of US foreign direct investment. Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2), 200207.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Pain, N. (1997) Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe. Economic Journal 107 (445), 17701786.Google Scholar
Bohn, H. and Tesar, L. L. (1996) U.S. equity investment in foreign markets: Portfolio rebalancing or return chasing? American Economic Review 86 (2), 7781.Google Scholar
Borensztein, E., de Gregorio, J., and Lee, J. W. (1998) How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics 45 (1), 115135.Google Scholar
Carkovic, M. V. and Levine, R. (2005) Does foreign direct investment accelerate economic growth? In Moran, T. H., Graham, E. M., and Blomström, M. (eds.), Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? pp. 195220. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Chari, V. V., Kehoe, P. J., and McGrattan, E. R. (2008) Are structural VARs with long-run restrictions useful in developing business cycle theory? Journal of Monetary Economics 55 (8), 13371352.Google Scholar
Chudik, A. and Pesaran, M. H. (2011) Infinite-dimensional VARs and factor models. Journal of Econometrics 163 (1), 422.Google Scholar
Chudik, A. and Pesaran, M. H. (2016) Theory and practice of GVAR modelling. Journal of Economic Surveys 30 (1), 165197.Google Scholar
Crespo Cuaresma, J., Feldkircher, M., and Huber, F. (2016) Forecasting with global vector autoregressive models: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 31 (7), 13711391.Google Scholar
De Mello, L. R. Jr. (1997) Foreign direct investment in developing countries and growth: A selective survey. Journal of Development Studies 34 (1), 134.Google Scholar
De Mello, L. R. (1999) Foreign direct investment-led growth: Evidence from time series and panel data. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1), 133151.Google Scholar
Dees, S., di Mauro, F., Pesaran, H. M., and Smith, L. V. (2007) Exploring the international linkages of the euro area: A global VAR analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22 (1), 138.Google Scholar
Dovern, J., Feldkircher, M., and Huber, F. (2016) Does joint modelling of the world economy pay off? Evaluating global forecasts from a Bayesian GVAR. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 70, 86100.Google Scholar
Dovern, J. and Huber, F. (2015) Global prediction of recessions. Economics Letters 133 (1), 8184.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. (2001) The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business 8 (2), 173190.Google Scholar
Durham, J. B. (2004) Absorptive capacity and the effects of foreign direct investment and equity foreign portfolio investment on economic growth. European Economic Review 48 (2), 285306.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. (1998) Capital Flows, Real Exchange Rates, and Capital Controls: Some Latin American Experiences. Working paper 6800, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Feldkircher, M. and Huber, F. (2016) The international transmission of U.S. structural shocks: Evidence from global vector autoregressions. European Economic Review 81, 167188.Google Scholar
Forni, M. and Lippi, M. (2001) The generalized dynamic factor model: Representation theory. Econometric Theory 17 (06), 11131141.Google Scholar
George, E. I. and McCulloch, R. E. (1993) Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (423), 881889.Google Scholar
George, E. I., Sun, D., and Ni, S. (2008) Bayesian stochastic search for VAR model restrictions. Journal of Econometrics 142 (1), 553580.Google Scholar
Geweke, J. and Amisano, G. (2010) Comparing and evaluating Bayesian predictive distributions of asset returns. International Journal of Forecasting 26 (2), 216230.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. and Krugman, P. R. (1985) Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koop, G., León-González, R., and Strachan, R. W. (2009) Efficient posterior simulation for cointegrated models with priors on the cointegration space. Econometric Reviews 29 (2), 224242.Google Scholar
Koop, G., Pesaran, M. H., and Potter, S. M. (1996) Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74 (1), 119147.Google Scholar
Kose, M. A., Prasad, E., Rogoff, K., and Wei, S. J. (2009) Financial globalization: A reappraisal. IMF Staff Papers 56 (1), 862.Google Scholar
Lipsey, R. E. and Sjöholm, F. (2005) The impact of inward FDI on host countries: Why such different answers? In Moran, T. H., Graham, E. M., and Blomström, M. (eds.), Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? pp. 2343. Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Liu, Z. (2008) Foreign direct investment and technology spillovers: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics 85 (1), 176193.Google Scholar
Mallick, S. and Moore, T. (2008) Foreign capital in a growth model. Review of Development Economics 12 (1), 143159.Google Scholar
Moran, T. H., Graham, E. M., and Blomström, M. (eds.) (2005) Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Naka, A. and Tufte, D. (1997) Examining impulse response functions in cointegrated systems. Applied Economics 29 (12), 15931603.Google Scholar
Pesaran, H. H. and Shin, Y. (1998) Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters 58 (1), 1729.Google Scholar
Pesaran, M. H., Schuermann, T., and Weiner, S. M. (2004) Modeling regional interdependencies using a global error-correcting macroeconometric model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 22 (2), 129162.Google Scholar
Rabanal, P. and Rubio-Ramírez, J. F. (2005) Comparing new Keynesian models of the business cycle: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Monetary Economics 52 (6), 11511166.Google Scholar
Ramondo, N. and Rappoport, V. (2010) The role of multinational production in a risky environment. Journal of International Economics 81 (2), 240252.Google Scholar
Rudebusch, G. and Svensson, L. E. (1999) Policy rules for inflation targeting. In Taylor, J. B. (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules, pp. 203262. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saborowski, C. (2009) Capital Inflows and the Real Exchange Rate: Can Financial Development Cure the Dutch Disease? IMF Working paper 09/20, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Sims, C. A., Stock, J. H., and Watson, M. W. (1990) Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 58 (1), 113144.Google Scholar
Sims, C. A. and Uhlig, H. (1991) Understanding unit rooters: A helicopter tour. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 59 (6), 15911599.Google Scholar
Strachan, R. W. and Inder, B. (2004) Bayesian analysis of the error correction model. Journal of Econometrics 123 (2), 307325.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. (2008) Economic growth with foreign capital. Review of Development Economics 12 (4), 694701.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. and Mallick, S. (2014) Explaining cross-country differences in exporting performance: The role of country-level macroeconomic environment. International Business Review 23 (1), 246259.Google Scholar