Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:49:49.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OPTIMAL GROWTH, DEBT DYNAMICS, AND WELFARE UNDER GDP-BASED COLLATERALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

Daria Onori*
Affiliation:
University of Orléans
*
Address correspondence to: Daria Onori, Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orléans, Faculté de Droit, Economie et Gestion, Rue de Blois-BP 26739, 45067 Orleans Cedex 2, France; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

We analyze the consequences of external debt collaterals on the optimal growth path of a country. We develop a small open economy model of endogenous growth where public spending can be financed by borrowing on imperfect international financial markets, where the country's borrowing capacity is limited. In contrast to the existing literature, which assumes that debt is constrained by the stock of capital, we investigate the consequences of gross domestic product (GDP)-based collaterals. First, we demonstrate that the economy may converge in a finite time, which is determined endogenously, to the regime with binding collaterals. Second, in such regime the steady-state public expenditures-to-GDP ratio is greater than that of the existing literature's models. Finally, we show that the degree of financial openness rises welfare if the collateral constraint is nonbinding and reduces welfare if the constraint binds. The first effect prevails always over the second and total intertemporal welfare increases.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank R. Becker, R. Boucekkine, N. Debarsy, R. Dos Santos Ferreira, C. Garcia-Peñalosa, M. Giannini, E. Marchetti, F. Mariani, M. Tidball, T. Trimborn, A. Venditti, P. Villieu, and the participants to conferences and seminars at Université catholique de Louvain, GREQAM Marseilles, Université d'Orléans. Finally, I am grateful to the anonymous referees for their suggestions, which have significantly improved the paper. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

REFERENCES

Ai, C. and Cassou, S. (1995) A normative analysis of public capital. Applied Economics 27, 12011209.Google Scholar
Aizenman, J., Kletzer, K., and Pinto, B. (2007) Economic Growth with Constraints on Tax Revenues and Public Debt: Implications for Fiscal Policy and Cross-Country Differences. NBER working paper 12750.Google Scholar
Aschauer, D. (1989) Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics 23, 177200.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, S103S125.Google Scholar
Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R., Fabbri, G., and Pintus, P. A. (2014) Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: The Conditional Welfare Gains from International Financial Integration. Working papers halshs-00790569, HAL.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R. and Pintus, P. (2012), History's curse: Leapfrogging, growth breaks and growth reversals under international borrowing without commitment. Journal of Economic Growth 17, 2747.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R., Pommeret, A., and Prieur, F. (2013a) Technological vs. ecological switch and the environmental Kuznets curve. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95, 252260.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R., Pommeret, A., and Prieur, F. (2013b) On the timing and optimality of capital controls: Public expenditures, debts dynamics and welfare. International Journal of Economic Theory 9, 101112.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R., Pommeret, A., and Prieur, F. (2013c) Optimal regime switching and threshold effects. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 29792997.Google Scholar
Boucekkine, R., Saglam, C., and Vallee, T. (2004) Technology adoption under embodiment: A two-stage optimal control approach, Macroeconomic Dynamics 8, 250271.Google Scholar
Brock, L. P. (2009) Collateral Constraints and Macroeconomic Adjustment in an Open Economy. University of Washington Economics working paper UWEC 2009-3.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Sakoulis, G., and Turnovsky, S. (2003) Unilateral capital transfers, public investment, and economic growth. European Economic Review 47, 10771103.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. and Sachs, J. (1986) Growth and external debt under risk of debt repudiation. European Economic Review 30, 526–60.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. and Gersovitz, M. (1981) Debt with potential repudiation: Theoretical and empirical analysis. The Review of Economic Studies 48, 289309.Google Scholar
Eberts, R. (1986) Estimating the Contribution of Urban Public Infrastructure to Regional Growth. Working paper 8610, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.Google Scholar
Futagami, K., Iwaisako, T., and Ohdoi, R. (2008) Debt policy rules, productive government spending, and multiple growth paths. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 445462.Google Scholar
Gourinchas, P. O. and Jeanne, O. (2006) The elusive gains from international financial integration. Review of Economic Studies 73, 715741.Google Scholar
Hayashi, F. (1982) Tobin's marginal q, average q: A neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50, 213224.Google Scholar
Minea, A. and Villieu, P. (2009), Borrowing to finance public investment? The ‘Golden rule of public finance’ reconsidered in an endogenous growth setting. Fiscal Studies 30, 103133.Google Scholar
Prieur, F., Tidball, M., and Withagen, C. (2011) Optimal Emission-Extraction Policy in a World of Scarcity and Irreversibility, CESifo working paper 3512.Google Scholar
Rendahl, P. (2015) Inequality constraints and Euler equation-based solution methods. Economic Journal 125, 11101135.Google Scholar
Tomiyama, K. (1985) Two-stage optimal control problems and optimality conditions. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 9, 317337.Google Scholar
Trimborn, T., Koch, K., and Steger, S. (2008a) Multidimensional transitional dynamics: A simple numerical procedure. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 301–19.Google Scholar
Trimborn, T., Koch, K., and Steger, S. (2008b) Multidimensional transitional dynamics: A simple numerical procedure (Mathematica). QM&RBC Codes 193, Quantitative Macroeconomics & Real Business Cycles.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, S. J. (1996) Fiscal policy, growth, and macroeconomic performance in a small open economy, Journal of International Economics 40, 4166.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, S. J. (1997) Equilibrium growth in a small economy facing an imperfect world capital market. Review of Development Economics 1, 122.Google Scholar
Turnovsky, S. J. (2002) Knife-edge conditions and the macrodynamics of small open economies. Macroeconomic Dynamics 6, 307335.Google Scholar