Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:23:42.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON THE OPTIMAL LEVEL OF MONETARY AGGREGATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

C. THOMAS ELGER ,
BARRY E. JONES ,
DAVID L. EDGERTON  and
JANE M. BINNER
C. THOMAS ELGER
Affiliation:
Lund University
BARRY E. JONES
Affiliation:
Binghamton University
DAVID L. EDGERTON
Affiliation:
Lund University
JANE M. BINNER
Affiliation:
Aston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weak separability is a key admissibility property in the Divisia approach to monetary aggregation. We test groups of U.K. household sector monetary assets for weak separability using new data underlying the Bank of England's benchmark revision of its household sector Divisia index. Nonparametric tests are used to identify four monetary asset groupings, which are weakly separable over all or almost all of the post-ERM period (1992:4–2005:1). We construct Divisia monetary aggregates for these four groupings and investigate their information content in two applications. The main findings are that Divisia money has direct effects on aggregate demand and that the growth rates of the nominal Divisia monetary aggregates Granger cause nominal output growth, but not inflation.

Keywords

Weak SeparabilityMonetary AggregationNonparametric Tests
Type
NOTES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 117 - 131
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson Richard G., Barry E. Jones, and Travis D. Nesmith 1997 Building new monetary services indexes: Concepts, data, and methods. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 79 (1), 53– 82.Google Scholar
Barnett William A. 1978 The user cost of money. Economics Letters 1, 145– 149.Google Scholar
Barnett William A. 1980 Economic monetary aggregates: An application of index numbers and aggregation theory. Journal of Econometrics 14, 11– 48.Google Scholar
Barnett William A. 1982 The optimal level of monetary aggregation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 14, 687– 710.Google Scholar
Barnett William A. 2003 Aggregation-Theoretic Monetary Aggregation over the Euro Area, When Countries Are Heterogeneous. European Central Bank Working Paper Series No. 260.Google Scholar
Belongia Michael T. 1996 Measurement matters: Recent results from monetary economics reexamined. Journal of Political Economy 104, 1065– 1083.Google Scholar
Belongia Michael T. and K. Alec Chrystal 1991 An admissible monetary aggregate for the United Kingdom. Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 497– 503.Google Scholar
Drake Leigh 1997 Nonparametric demand analysis of UK personal sector decisions on consumption, leisure and monetary assets: A reappraisal. Review of Economic Statistics 79, 679– 683.Google Scholar
Drake Leigh and Terence C. Mills 2005 A new empirically weighted Divisia index for the United States. Economic Inquiry 43, 138– 157.Google Scholar
Elger C. Thomas, Barry E. Jones, and A. Birger Nilsson 2006 Forecasting with monetary aggregates: Recent evidence for the United States. Journal of Economics and Business 58, 428– 446.Google Scholar
Estrella Arturo and Frederic S. Mishkin 1997 Is there a role for monetary aggregates in the conduct of monetary policy? Journal of Monetary Economics 40, 279– 304.Google Scholar
Fleissig Adrian R. and Gerald A. Whitney 2003 A new PC-based test for Varian's weak separability conditions. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 21, 133– 144.Google Scholar
Fleissig Adrian R. and Gerald A. Whitney 2005 Testing for the significance of violations of Afriat's inequalities. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 23, 355– 362.Google Scholar
Hancock Matthew 2005 Divisia money. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin Spring, 39– 46.Google Scholar
Jones Barry E., C. Thomas Elger, David L. Edgerton, and Donald H. Dutkowsky 2005 Toward a unified approach to testing for weak separability. Economics Bulletin 3 (20), 1– 7.Google Scholar
Jones Barry E. and Philippe de Peretti 2005 A comparison of two methods for testing the utility maximization hypothesis when quantity data is measured with error. Macroeconomic Dynamics 9, 612– 629.Google Scholar
Lucas Robert E. 2000 Inflation and welfare. Econometrica 68, 247– 274.Google Scholar
Meltzer Allan H. 2001 The transmission process. In Deutsche Bundesbank (ed.), The Monetary Transmission Process: Recent Developments and Lessons for Europe, pp. 112– 130. London: Palgrave.
Nelson Edward 2002 Direct effects of base money on aggregate demand: Theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 687– 708.Google Scholar
Nelson Edward 2003 The future of monetary aggregates in monetary policy analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 1029– 1059.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics 2005 The Blue Book. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Patterson Kerry D. 1991 A non-parametric analysis of personal sector decisions on consumption, liquid assets and leisure. Economic Journal 101, 1103– 1116.Google Scholar
Schunk Donald L. 2001 The relative forecasting performance of the Divisia and simple sum monetary aggregates. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 33, 272– 283.Google Scholar
Stock James H. and Mark W. Watson 1999 Forecasting inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics 44, 293– 335.Google Scholar
Stracca Livio 2004 Does liquidity matter? Properties of a synthetic Divisia monetary aggregate in the Euro area. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66, 309– 331.Google Scholar
Svensson Lars E.O. 2003 Comment on the future of monetary aggregates in monetary policy analysis, Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 1061– 1070.Google Scholar
Swofford James L. and Gerald A. Whitney 1991 The composition and construction of monetary aggregates. Economic Inquiry 29, 752– 761.Google Scholar
Swofford James L. and Gerald A. Whitney 1994 A revealed preference test for weakly separable utility maximization with incomplete adjustment. Journal of Econometrics 60, 235– 249.Google Scholar
Varian Hal R. 1982 The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 50, 945– 973.Google Scholar
Varian Hal R. 1983 Non-parametric tests of consumer behaviour. Review of Economic Studies 50, 99– 110.Google Scholar
Varian Hal R. 1985 Non-parametric analysis of optimizing behavior with measurement error. Journal of Econometrics 30, 445– 458.Google Scholar
Zhou Jian L., André L. Tits, and Craig T. Lawrence 1997 User's Guide for FFSQP Version 3: A Fortran Code for Solving Optimization Programs, Possibly Minimax, with General Inequality Constraints and Linear Equality Constraints, Generating Feasible Iterates. Technical Report SRC-TR-92-107r5, Institute for Systems Research, College Park, MD. University of Maryland