Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:40:52.069Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MONETARY POLICY SWITCHING IN THE EURO AREA AND MULTIPLE STEADY STATES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

Gilles Dufrénot  and
Guillaume A. Khayat
Gilles Dufrénot
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), CNRS and EHESS, CEPII, and Banque deFrance
Guillaume A. Khayat*
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University (Aix-Marseille School of Economics), and CNRS and EHESS
*
Address correspondence to: Anwar Khayat, GREQAM, Centre de la vieille charité, 2 Rue de la charité 13002 Marseille, France; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates, in the case of the euro area, the standard assumption that the liquidity trap steady state, which arises from the existence of the zero lower bound on the nominal interest rate, is locally unstable. We show that the policy function of the European Central Bank (ECB) is described by a nonlinear Taylor rule. Then, using our estimations, we show that around the liquidity trap steady state the equilibrium is locally determinate for most plausible parameter values. Finally, we find that an inflation shock is more efficient than a demand shock to escape the liquidity trap steady state.

Keywords

Monetary PolicyIndeterminacyNonlinear Taylor RulesMultiple Steady StatesEuro Area
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 21 , Special Issue 5: Recent Topics in Computational Macroeconomics , July 2017 , pp. 1175 - 1188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was presented at the third ISCEF Conference (Paris, April 10–12, 2014, www.iscef.com). We thank the participants for their comments that helped improving the initial version of the paper. We also thank two anonymous referees for their comments. Any remaining errors are ours.

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, W., Haider, A., and Iqbal, J. (2012) Estimation of Discount Factor (beta) and Coefficient of Relative Risk Aversion (gamma) in Selected Countries. MRPA paper 39736.Google Scholar
Alcidi, C., Flamini, A., and Fracasso, A. (2011) Policy regime changes, judgment and Taylor rules in the Greenspan era. Economica 78, 89–107.Google Scholar
Anufriev, M., Assenza, T., Hommes, C., and Massaro, D. (2013) Interest rate rules and macroeconomic stability under heterogeneous expectations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17 (8), 1574–1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aruoba, S.B. and Schorfheide, F. (2013) Macroeconomic Dynamics near the ZLB: A Tale of Two Equilibria. NBER working paper 19248.Google Scholar
Assenmacher-Wesche, K. (2006). Estimating central banks' preferences from a time-varying empirical reaction function. European Economic Review 50 (8), 1951–1974.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A.J. and Obstfeld, M. (2005) The case for open-market purchases in a liquidity trap. American Economic Review 95 (1), 110–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belke, A. and Polleit, T. (2007) How the ECB and the US Fed set interest rates. Applied Economics 39 (17), 2197–2209.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohe, S., and Uribe, M. (2001a) Monetary policy and multiple equilibria. American Economic Review 91 (1), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohe, S., and Uribe, M. (2001b) The perils of Taylor rules. Journal of Economic Theory 96 (1–2), 40–69.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohe, S., and Uribe, M. (2002a) Avoiding liquidity traps. Journal of Political Economy 110 (3), 535–563.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohe, S., and Uribe, M. (2002b) Chaotic interest-rate rules. American Economic Review 92 (2), 72–78.Google Scholar
Bullard, J. (2010) Seven faces of “the peril.“ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 92 (5), 339–352.Google Scholar
Castro, V. and Sousa, R.M. (2012) How do central banks react to wealth composition and asset prices? Economic Modelling 29 (3), 641–653.Google Scholar
Chattopadhyay, S. and Daniel, B.C. (2013) Taylor-Rule Exit Policies for the Zero Lower-Bound. MRPA_paper_66076.Google Scholar
Davig, T. and Leeper, E.M. (2006) Endogenous Monetary Policy Regime Change. NBER working paper 12405.Google Scholar
de Haan, J., Gorter, J., and Jacobs, J. (2008) Taylor rules for the ECB using expectations data. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110 (3), 473–488.Google Scholar
Dijk, D.V., Terasvirta, T., and Franses, P.H. (2002) Smooth transition autoregressive models–A survey of recent developments. Econometric Reviews 21 (1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dufrénot, G. and Khayat, A. (2014) Monetary Policy Switching in the Euro Area and Multiple Equilibria: An Empirical Investigation. AMSE working paper 1408.Google Scholar
Dufrénot, G., Mignon, V., and Peguin-Feissolle, A. (2004) Business cycles asymmetry and monetary policy: A further investigation using MRSTAR models. Economic Modelling 21 (1), 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eusepi, S. (2007) Learnability and monetary policy: A global perspective. Journal of Monetary Economics 54 (4), 1115–1131.Google Scholar
Evans, G.W., Guse, E., and Honkapohja, S. (2008) Liquidity traps, learning and stagnation. European Economic Review 52 (8), 1438–1463.Google Scholar
Gros, D. and Grauwe, P.D. (2009) A New Two-Pillar Strategy for the ECB. CESifo working paper 2818.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, E., Medeiros, M.C., and Xu, J. (2012) Asymptotic Theory for Regressions with Smoothly Changing Parameters. CREATES research paper 2012-31).Google Scholar
Hirose, Y. (2013) Monetary policy and sunspot fluctuations in the United States and the Euro area. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17 (1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Huang, K.X.D. and Meng, Q. (2009). On interest rate policy and equilibrium stability under increasing returns: A note. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13 (4), 535–552.Google Scholar
Jawadi, F., Mallick, S.K., and Sousa, R.M. (2014) Nonlinear monetary policy reaction functions in large emerging economies: The case of Brazil and China. Applied Economics 46 (9), 973–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawadi, F. and Sousa, R.M. (2013) Money demand in the Euro area, the US and the UK: Assessing the role of nonlinearity. Economic Modelling 32, 507–515.Google Scholar
Koop, G., Pesaran, M.H., and Potter, S.M. (1996) Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics 74 (1), 119–147.Google Scholar
Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P., and Terasvirta, T. (1988) Testing linearity against smooth transition autoregressive models. Biometrika 75 (3), 491–499.Google Scholar
Mallick, S.K. and Sousa, R.M. (2013) The real effects of financial stress in the Eurozone. International Review of Financial Analysis 30 (C), 1–17.Google Scholar
Piergallini, A. (2016) A note on nonlinear fiscal regimes and interest rate policy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20, 832–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, S. and Sturm, J.-E. (2007) Using Taylor rules to understand European Central Bank monetary policy. German Economic Review 8 (8), 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt-Grohe, S. and Uribe, M. (2009) Liquidity traps with global Taylor rules. International Journal of Economic Theory 5, 85–106.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Grohe, S. and Uribe, M. (2012) The Making of a Great Contraction with a Liquidity Trap and a Jobless Recovery. NBER working paper 18544.Google Scholar
Schorfheide, F. (2005) Learning and monetary policy shifts. Review of Economic Dynamics 8 (2), 392–419.Google Scholar
Sousa, R.M. (2010) Housing wealth, financial wealth, money demand and policy rule: Evidence from the Euro area. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 21 (1), 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sousa, R.M. (2014) Wealth, asset portfolio, money demand and policy rule. Bulletin of Economic Research 66 (1), 95–111.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (2004) The Magic of the Exchange Rate: Optimal Escape from a Liquidity Trap in Small and Large Open Economies. Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research working paper 072004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trecroci, C. and Vassalli, M. (2010) Monetary policy regime shifts: New evidence from time varying interest rate rules. Economic Inquiry 48 (4), 933–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullrich, K. (2003) A Comparison between the Fed and the ECB: Taylor Rules. ZEW discussion paper 03-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zampolli, F. (2006). Optimal monetary policy in a regime-switching economy: The response to abrupt shifts in exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30 (9–10), 1527–1567.Google Scholar