Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:54:31.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MINIMUM WAGE AND SEVERANCE PAYMENTS IN A FRICTIONAL LABOR MARKET: THEORY AND ESTIMATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Carolina Silva*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Alicante
*
Address correspondence to: Carolina Silva, Ibn Gabirol 40, Apartment 6, 6436405 Tel Aviv, Israel; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Wage dispersion is a critical factor in determining the impact of a minimum wage and severance payments on job creation and destruction in a general equilibrium model with search frictions. When wage dispersion is low, the minimum wage and severance payments behave as substitutes. However, as dispersion in wages increases, these policies become complements. The model is estimated using data from Chile and used to perform quantitative welfare analysis.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Financial support from the Ministry of Science and Feder Funds, under Project SEJ-2007-62656, is gratefully acknowledged. I am grateful to Giuseppe Moscarini, Björn Brügemann, Eduardo Engel, David Weiss and Marcello Sartarelli for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

REFERENCES

Abowd, John M. and Kramarz, Francis (2003) The costs of hiring and separations. Labour Economics 10, 499530.Google Scholar
Binmore, Ken, Rubinstein, Ariel, and Wolinsky, Asher (1986) The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. RAND Journal of Economics 17, 176188.Google Scholar
Cahuc, Pierre, Postel-Vinay, Fabien, and Robin, Jean M. (2006) Wage bargaining with on-the-job search: Theory and evidence. Econometrica 74, 323364.Google Scholar
Cahuc, Pierre and Zylberberg, André (1999) Job Protection, Minimum Wage and Unemployment. IZA discussion paper 95, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).Google Scholar
Coddington, Earl A. and Levinson, Norman (1955) Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.Google Scholar
Cowan, Kevin and Micco, Alejandro (2005) El seguro de desempleo en Chile: Reformas pendientes. En Foco 53, Expansiva, Santiago.Google Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael and MacCulloch, Robert (2005) The consequences of labor market flexibility: Panel evidence based on survey data. European Economic Review 49, 12251259.Google Scholar
Flinn, Christopher J. (2006) Minimum wage effects on labor market outcomes under search, matching, and endogenous contact rates. Econometrica 47, 10131062.Google Scholar
Flinn, Christopher J. and Mabli, James (2008) On-the-Job Search, Minimum Wages, and Labor Market Outcomes in an Equilibrium Bargaining Framework. Carlo Alberto notebook 91, Collegio Carlo Alberto.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, Pietro and Violante, Giovanni L. (2005) The employment effects of severance payments with wage rigidities. Economic Journal 115, 799832.Google Scholar
Harrison, John M. (1985) Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. and Flinn, Christopher J. (1982) New methods for analyzing structural models of labor force dynamics. Journal of Econometrics 18, 115168.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J. and Pages, Carmen (2000) The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets. NBER working paper 7773, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Hosios, Arthur J. (1990) On the efficiency of matching and related models of search and unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 57, 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, Edward P. (1990) Job security provisions and employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 105, 699726.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar and Snower, Dennis J. (1988) The Insider–Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millard, Stephen P. and Mortensen, Dale T. (1997) The unemployment and welfare effects of labour market policy: A comparison of the USA and the UK. In Snower, D. and de la Dehesa, G. (eds.), Unemployment Policy: Government Options for the Labour Market, pp. 545572. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mizala, Alejandra (1998) Regulación del mercado laboral en Chile: 1975–1995. Revista Perspectivas en Política, Economía y Gestión 2, 185213.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Dale T. and Pissarides, Christopher A. (1994) Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. Review of Economic Studies 61, 397415.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Dale T. and Pissarides, Christopher A. (1999) New developments in models of search in the labor market. In Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 25672627. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Neumark, David and Wascher, William L. (2007) Minimum wages and employment. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics 3, 1182.Google Scholar
OECD (2004) Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2010) Economic Survey of Chile. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pissarides, Christopher A. (2000) Equilibrium Unemployment Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prat, Julien (2006) Job separation under uncertainty and the wage distribution. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 6, 134.Google Scholar
Prat, Julien (2010) The rate of learning-by-doing: Estimates from a search-matching model. Journal of Applied Econometrics 25, 929962.Google Scholar
Skedinger, Per (2010) Employment Protection Legislation: Evolution, Effects, Winners and Losers. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Toledo, Manuel and Silva, Jose I. (2009) Labor turnover costs and the cyclical behavior of vacancies and unemployment. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13 (S1), 7696.Google Scholar
Yashiv, Eran (2003) Bargaining, the Value of Unemployment, and the Behavior of Aggregate Wages. Unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Yashiv, Eran (2007) Labor search and matching in macroeconomics. European Economic Review 51, 18591895.Google Scholar