Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T09:18:08.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIQUIDITY PROVISION AND BANKING CRISES WITH HETEROGENEOUS AGENTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Matías Fontenla
Matías Fontenla*
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
*
Address correspondence to: Matías Fontenla, Department of Economics, MSC05 3060, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131–0001, USA; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The banking literature following Diamond and Dybvig [Journal of Political Economy 85, 191–206 (1983)] has assumed that all depositors are ex ante identical. This paper relaxes this assumption by introducing two types of agents. Whereas some agents are uncertain about their liquidity needs at the time they deposit in banks, other agents know exactly at what time they will want to withdraw their funds. Agents who know ex ante that they will want to withdraw in the short term will tend to disrupt the ability of a bank to serve customers who are uncertain about their timing of withdrawal. An adverse selection problem arises, where short-term deposits have the incentive to join the financial system and limit, or completely do away with, banks' liquidity provision service. On the other hand, potentially beneficial long-term funds will not be deposited in banks. Further, when unpredicted short-term withdrawal needs are sufficiently high, bank reserves are exhausted, and long-term investments need to be disrupted, causing a banking crisis.

Keywords

Financial IntermediationLiquidity CrisisInvestment
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 13 , Supplement S1 , May 2009 , pp. 118 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antinolfi, Gaetano and Keister, Todd (2006) Discount window policy, banking crises, and indeterminacy of equilibrium. Macroeconomic Dynamics 10, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bencivenga, Valerie and Smith, Bruce D. (1991) Financial intermediation and endogenous growth. Review of Economic Studies 58, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, John (1980) A model of reserves, bank runs, and deposit insurance. Journal of Banking and Finance 4, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprio, G., Klingebiel, D., Laeven, L., and Noguera, G. (2005) Banking crisis database. In Honohan, P. and Laeven, L. (eds.) Systemic Financial Crises: Containment and Resolution, pp. 307–340. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Douglas and Dybvig, Philip (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy 85, 191–206.Google Scholar
Ennis, Huberto and Keister, Todd (2003) Economic growth, liquidity and bank runs. Journal of Economic Theory 109, 220–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fecht, Falko and Martin, Antoine (2005) Banks, Markets and Efficiency. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports No. 210.Google Scholar
Jacklin, Charles J. (1987) Demand deposits, trading restrictions, and risk sharing. In Prescott, Ed and Wallace, Neil (eds.), Contractual Arrangements for Intertemporal Trade, pp. 26–47. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jacklin, Charles J. (1993) Market rate versus fixed rate demand deposits. Journal of Monetary Economics 32, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. (2002) Monetary policy, banking crises and the friedman rule. AER Papers and Proceedings 92, 128–134.Google Scholar
Von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig, (1997) The term structure of investments and the bank's insurance function. European Economic Review 41, 1355–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar