Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:26:10.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INFLATION TARGETING, CREDIT FLOWS, AND FINANCIAL STABILITY IN A REGIME CHANGE MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2018

Marco Gross  and
Willi Semmler
Marco Gross*
Affiliation:
European Central Bank
Willi Semmler
Affiliation:
New School for Social Research and University of Bielefeld
*
Address correspondence to: Marco Gross, European Central Bank, Sonnemannstrasse 22, 60314 Frankfurt (Main), Germany; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent papers point to the problem that inflation-targeting models do not as of yet consider financial market stability that can considerably derail inflation-targeting monetary policy, implying significant nonzero crisis probabilities that could come along with large negative output and employment gaps. Credit flows and the instability of credit appear to be at the root of the financial instability problem. On the other hand, some authors recently questioned whether a too early and too strong leaning against the wind policy by central banks might have higher costs than benefits in terms of output and employment losses. In our paper, we include in an inflation targeting model a financial stabilization goal. In contrast to infinite horizon and two-period models, we propose a finite horizon model. The model is solved by using a new global solution algorithm, called Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC), exploring stabilizing/destabilizing effects of price and nonprice (credit volume) drivers of the output gap, inflation, and credit flows. We substantiate the theoretical part of the paper by approaching the subject empirically, relying to that end on a regime-switching structural vector autoregressive (VAR) for the euro area. The empirical model contains standard macroeconomic variables along with credit flows and loan interest rates, the central bank policy rate, and European Central Bank (ECB) balance sheet variables. The regime-switching feature of the model is meant to capture the state-dependent relationship between the variables, with specific nonlinearities having direct counterparts in the theoretical model. Based on a sign restriction methodology, we explore conventional and unconventional monetary policy shocks, loan supply, and demand shocks, under different regime assumptions to reveal the state-dependent effects of both interest rate and volume-based policies. The empirical results are used as guidance for the calibration of the theoretical model variants.

Keywords

Monetary PolicyMacroprudential PolicyFinancial StabilityRegime Switching
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Special Issue S1: Special Issue in Honor of Clifford Wymer on Developments in Macroeconomics , September 2019 , pp. 59 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A preliminary version of this paper has been presented at the CEF Conference in Bordeaux, June 2016. We thank the participants and Sergey Maliar for comments. We also thank Giovanni Di Bartolomeo for making us aware of the continuous time work of Clifford Wymer.

References

REFERENCES

Ajello, A., Laubach, T., Lopez-Salido, D., and Nakata, T. (2016) Financial Stability and Optimal Interest-Rate Policy. Federal Reserve Board working paper 2016-067, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ball, L. and Mazumder, S. (2014) A Phillips Curve with Anchored Expectations and Short-Term Unemployment. Working paper 20715, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Biggs, M., Mayer, T., and Pick, A. (2009) Credit and Economic Recovery. DNB working paper 218.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. (2013) Remarks on Debt and Macroeconomics, Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy II. Technical report, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. (1983) Debt and the current account deficit in Brazil. In Armella, P. Aspe, Dornbusch, R. and Obstfeld, M. (eds.), Financial Policies and the World Capital Market: The Problem of Latin American Countries, pp. 187–198. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borio, C., Erdem, M., Filardo, A., and Hofmann, B. (2015) The costs of deflations: A historical perspective. BIS Quarterly Review March, 31–54.Google Scholar
Canova, F. and De Nicolo, G. (2002) Monetary disturbances matter for business cycle fluctuations in the G-7. Journal of Monetary Economics 49 (6), 1131–1159.Google Scholar
Chen, P. and Semmler, W. (2013) Financial Stress, Regime Switching and Macrodynamics: Theory and Empirics for the US, EU and Non-EU Countries. Economics discussion paper 2013-24, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Google Scholar
Cerutti, Eugenio, Ricardo, Correa, Elisabetta, Fiorentino, and Esther, Segalla (2016) Changes in Prudential Policy Instruments—A New Cross-Country Database. IMF working paper 16/110.Google Scholar
Ehrmann, M., Ellison, M., and Valla, N. (2001) Regime-Dependent Impulse Response Functions in a Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression Model. Bank of Finland discussion paper 11/2001.Google Scholar
Faust, J. (1998) The robustness of identified VAR conclusions about money, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 49 (1), 207–244.Google Scholar
Gavin, W., Richter, K. A., and Throckmorton, N. (2013) Global Dynamics at the Zero Lower Bound. Working paper 2013-007A, Research Division, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.Google Scholar
Gross, M. and Semmler, W. (2017) Mind the Output Gap: The Disconnect of Growth and Inflation During Recessions and Convex Phillips Curves in the Euro Area. ECB working paper 2004. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp2004.en.pdf?94d1164c11c4bb06c797cb5cf31f3099.Google Scholar
Gross, M., Henry, J., and Semmler, W. (2016) Destabilizing effects of bank overleveraging on real activity – An analysis based on a Threshold MCS-GVAR. Macroeconomic Dynamics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gruene, L. and Pannek, J. (2011) Nonlinear Model Predictive Control. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gruene, L., Semmler, W., and Stieler, M. (2015) Using nonlinear model predictive control for dynamic decision problems in Economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 60, 112–133.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. D. (1994) Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jarocinski, M. and Lenza, M. (2016) An Inflation-Predicting Measure of the Output Gap in the Euro Area. ECB working paper 1966.Google Scholar
Jorda, O., Schularick, M., and Taylor, A. (2010) Financial Crises, Credit Booms, and External Imbalances: 140 Years of Lessons. NBER working paper 16567.Google Scholar
Jorda, O., Schularick, M., and Taylor, A. (2013) When credit bites back: Leverage, business cycles, and crises. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45 (s2), 3–28.Google Scholar
Kumhof, M., Lebarz, C., Rancire, R., Richter, A., and Throckmorton, N. (2012) Income Inequality and Current Account Imbalances. IMF working paper WP/12/08.Google Scholar
Kumhof, M., Ranciere, R., and Winant, P. (2013) Inequality, Leverage and Crises: The Case of Endogenous Default. IMF working paper WP/13/249.Google Scholar
Mittnik, S. and Semmler, W. (2013) The real consequences of financial stress. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37 (8), 1479–1499.Google Scholar
Mittnik, S. and Semmler, W. (2016) The instability of the banking sector and macrodynamics: Theory and empirics. Macroeconomic Dynamics (forthcoming), doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1871043.Google Scholar
Orphanides, A. and van Norden, S. (2002) The unreliability of output-gap estimates in real time. Review of Economics and Statistics 84 (4), 569–583.Google Scholar
Schularick, M. and Taylor, (2012). Credit booms gone bust: Monetary policy, leverage cycles and financial crises, 1870–2008. American Economic Review Review 102 (2), 1029–1061.Google Scholar
Schleer, F. and Semmler, W. (2015) Financial sector and output dynamics in the euro area: Non-linearities reconsidered. Journal of Macroeconomics 46, 235–263.Google Scholar
Schleer, F., Semmler, W., and Illner, J. (2014) Overleveraging in the Banking Sector: Evidence from Europe. Discussion paper 14-066, ZEW, Mannheim, http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp14066.pdf.Google Scholar
Sims, C. (2010) Rational inattention and monetary economics. In Friedman, Ben and Woodford, Michael (eds.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, chapter 4, pp. 155–181. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (1997) Inflation forecast targeting: Implementing and monitoring inflation targets. European Economic Review 41 (6), 1111–1146.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (2014). Inflation targeting and leaning against the wind. International Journal of Central Banking 10 (2), 103–114.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (2016). Cost-Benefit Analysis of Leaning Against the Wind: Are Costs Larger Also with Less Effective Macroprudential Policy? IMF working paper WP 16/3.Google Scholar
Tressel, T. and Zhang, Y.-S. (2016) Effectiveness and Channels of Macroprudential Instruments Lessons from the Euro Area. IMF working paper WP/16/110.Google Scholar
Uhlig, H. (2005) What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure, Journal of Monetary Economics 52 (2), 381–419.Google Scholar
Werning, I. (2012) Managing a Liquidity Trap: Monetary and Fiscal Policy. MIT mimeo.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2012) Inflation Targeting and Financial Stability. Columbia University, manuscript.Google Scholar
Wymer, C. (1997) Structural nonlinear continuous-time models in econometrics. Macroeconomic Dynamics 1 (2), 518–548.Google Scholar
Zdzienicka, Aleksandra, Sally, Chen, Federico, Diaz Kalan, Stefan, Laseen, and Katsiaryna, Svirydzenka (2015) Effects of Monetary and Macroprudential Policies on Financial Conditions: Evidence from the United States. IMF working paper 15/288.Google Scholar