Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:31:39.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INAPPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY What Is in It for the Rich?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2007

ANA FERNANDES  and
KRISHNA B. KUMAR
ANA FERNANDES
Affiliation:
University of Bern
KRISHNA B. KUMAR
Affiliation:
Fuqua School of Business, Duke University and RAND
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate incentives, other than altruism, that developed countries have for improving developing country technologies. We propose a simple model of international trade between two regions, in which individuals have preferences over an inferior good and a luxury good. The poor region has a comparative advantage in the production of the inferior good. Even when costly adaptation of the technology to the poor region's characteristics is required—making the technology inappropriate for local use—there are parameter configurations for which the rich region has an incentive to incur this cost. It benefits from a terms-of-trade improvement and from greater specialization in the luxury good. Indeed, there are cases where the rich region would prefer to improve the poor region's technology for producing the inferior good rather than its own. We apply our model to the Green Revolution and provide a quantitative assessment of its welfare effects.

Keywords

Technology ImprovementsDynamic Trade ModelsWelfare Analysis
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , September 2007 , pp. 487 - 518
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abler David, George Tolley, and G. K. Kripalani 1994 Technical Change and Income Distribution in Indian Agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Acemoglu Daron and Fabrizio Zilibotti 2001 Productivity differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 563– 606.Google Scholar
Bhagwati Jagdish 1958 Immiserizing growth: A geometrical note. Review of Economics Studies 25, 201– 205.Google Scholar
Basu Susanto and David N. Weil 1998 Appropriate technology and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1025– 1054.Google Scholar
Baxter Marianne 1992 Fiscal policy, specialization, and trade in the two-sector model: The return of Ricardo? Journal of Political Economy 100, 713– 744.Google Scholar
Boldrin Michele and David Levine 2002 The case against intellectual property. American Economic Review 92, 209– 212.Google Scholar
Chatterjee Satyajit and B. Ravikumar 1999 Minimum consumption requirements: Theoretical and quantitative implications for growth and distribution Macroeconomic Dynamics 3, 482– 505.Google Scholar
Cohen Benjamin I. and Daniel G. Sisler 1971 Exports of developing countries in the 1960's. Review of Economics and Statistics 53, 354– 361.Google Scholar
Desmet Klaus 2002 A simple dynamic model of uneven development and overtaking. Economic Journal 112, 894– 918.Google Scholar
Evenson R. E. and Douglas Gollin 2001 Crop genetic improvement in developing countries: overview and summary. In R. E. Evenson and D. Gollin (eds.), Crop Variety Improvement and Its Effect on Productivity: The Impact of International Agricultural Research, pp. 7– 38. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
Hall Robert E. and Charles I. Jones 1999 Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83– 116.Google Scholar
Matsuyama Kiminori 2000 A Ricardian model with a continuum of goods under nonhomothetic preferences: Demand complementarities, income distribution, and North-South trade. Journal of Political Economy 108, 1093– 1120.Google Scholar
Morisset Jacques 1998 Unfair trade? The increasing gap between world and domestic prices in commodity markets during the past 25 years. World Bank Economic Review 12, 503– 526.Google Scholar
Rivera-Batiz Luis A. and Paul M. Romer 1991 Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531– 555Google Scholar
Romer Paul M. 1990 Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, S71– S102.Google Scholar
Sachs Jeffrey D. 1999 Helping the world's poorest. The Economist, August 12, 1999.Google Scholar
Sachs Jeffrey D. 2005 The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. New York: Penguin.
Sachs Jeffrey D, Michael Kremer, and Amar Hamoudi 2001 The Case for a Vaccine Purchase Fund. Working Paper, Center for International Development Policy at Harvard University.Google Scholar