Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:38:55.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDIOSYNCRATIC SHOCKS AND ASSET RETURNS IN THE REAL-BUSINESS-CYCLE MODEL: AN APPROXIMATE ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2005

EVA CÁRCELES-POVEDA
EVA CÁRCELES-POVEDA
Affiliation:
SUNY at Stony Brook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present paper uses an analytical approach to derive approximate closed-form solutions for the asset moments of a real-business-cycle model with idiosyncratic risk. To preserve analytical tractability, risk sharing is completely shut down. Further, the firm is assumed to maximize a variant of value maximization, given that its usual objective is no longer well defined under market incompleteness. When idiosyncratic risk is incorporated into the model, the asset moments can be decomposed into their value under identical households plus a new idiosyncratic term. Under full constrained persistence, in which case the same household determines the asset moments every period, the model is able to generate the risk premium in the data with reasonable parameter values, but it cannot generate the risk return trade-off. While the quantitative impact of idiosyncratic risk is smaller when there is only some persistence in who is constrained, the qualitative predictions are unaltered.

Keywords

Asset PricesIncomplete MarketsRBC ModelAnalytical Solution
Type
ARTICLES
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , June 2005 , pp. 295 - 320
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boldrin M. J. Christiano, and J. Fisher 2001 Habit persistence, asset returns and the business cycle. American Economic Review 91, 149– 166.Google Scholar
Campbell J.Y. 1994 Inspecting the mechanism, An analytical approach to the stochastic growth model. Journal of Monetary Economics 33, 463– 506.Google Scholar
Campbell J.Y. and R. Shiller 1994 The dividend price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Review of Financial Studies 1, 195– 228.Google Scholar
Carceles-Poveda E. 2003 Asset Prices and Business Cycles Under Market Incompleteness. Working Paper, SUNY at Stony Brook.
Carceles-Poveda E. 2004 Capital adjustment costs and firm risk aversion. Economic Letters 81, 101– 107.Google Scholar
Danthine J.P. and J.B. Donaldson 2002 Labor relations and asset returns. Review of Economic Studies 69, 41– 64.Google Scholar
Dreze J.H. 1985 (Uncertainty and) the firm in GE theory. Economic Journal 95, 1– 20.Google Scholar
Grossman S.J. and O.D. Hart 1979 A theory of competitive equilibrium in stock market economies. Econometrica 47, 293– 330.Google Scholar
Grossman S.J. and J.E. Stiglitz 1977 On value maximization and alternative objectives for the firm. Journal of Finance 32, 389– 402.Google Scholar
Guo H. (in press) Limited stock market participation and asset prices in a dynamic economy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
Guvenen F. 2003 A Parsimonious Macroeconomic Model of Asset Pricing: Habit Formation or Cross Sectional Heterogeneity? Working paper.
Heaton J. and D. Lucas 1996 Evaluating the effects of incomplete markets on risk sharing and asset pricing. Journal of Political Economy 104, 443– 487.Google Scholar
Jermann U.J. 1998 Asset pricing in production economies. Journal of Monetary Economics 41, 257– 275.Google Scholar
Krusell P. and A. Smith 1997 Income and wealth heterogeneity, portfolio choice, and equilibrium asset returns. Macroeconomic Dynamics 1, 387– 422.Google Scholar
Lettau M. 2002 Idiosyncratic risk and volatility bounds, or, can models with idiosyncratic risk solve the equity premium puzzle? Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 376– 380.Google Scholar
Lettau M. 2003 Inspecting the mechanism: The determination of asset prices in the real business cycle model. Economic Journal 113, 550– 575.Google Scholar
Lettau M. and H. Uhlig 2002 Can habit formation be reconciled with real business cycle facts? Review of Economic Dynamics 3, 79– 99.Google Scholar
Lettau M. and H. Uhlig 2002 Sharpe ratios and preferences: An analytical approach. Macroeconomic Dynamics 6, 242– 265.Google Scholar
Lucas J. D. 1994 Asset pricing with undiversifiable income risk and short sale constraints. Deepening the equity premium puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 325– 341.Google Scholar
Marcet A. and K. Singleton 1999 Equilibrium asset prices and savings of heterogeneous agents in the presence of incomplete markets and portfolio constraints. Macroeconomic Dynamics 3, 243– 277.Google Scholar
Mehra R. and E.C. Prescott 1985 The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145– 161.Google Scholar
Rouwenhorst K.G. 1995 Asset prices implications of equilibrium business cycle models. In T.F. Cooley (ed.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, pp. 294– 330. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Storesletten K., C. Telmer and A. Yaron 2004 Cyclical dynamics in idiosyncratic labor market risk. Journal of Political Economy 112, 695– 717.Google Scholar
Telmer C. 1993 Asset pricing puzzles and incomplete markets. Journal of Finance 48, 1803– 1832.Google Scholar
Uhlig H. 1999 A toolkit for analyzing nonlinear dynamic stochastic models easily. In R. Marimon and A. Scott (eds.), Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies, pp. 30– 61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.