Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:04:36.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HUMAN CAPITAL AND INNOVATION IN A MONETARY SCHUMPETERIAN GROWTH MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2017

Angus C. Chu
Affiliation:
Fudan University
Lei Ning*
Affiliation:
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
Dongming Zhu
Affiliation:
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
*
Address correspondence to: Lei Ning, Institute for Advanced Research, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

This study explores the growth and welfare effects of monetary policy in a scale-invariant Schumpeterian growth model with endogenous human capital accumulation. We model money demand via a cash-in-advance (CIA) constraint on research and development (R&D) investment. Our results can be summarized as follows. We find that an increase in the nominal interest rate leads to a decrease in R&D and human capital investment, which, in turn, reduces the long-run growth rates of technology and output. This result stands in stark contrast to the case of exogenous human capital accumulation in which the long-run growth rates of technology and output are independent of the nominal interest rate. Simulating the transitional dynamics, we find that the additional long-run growth effect under endogenous human capital accumulation amplifies the welfare effect of monetary policy. Decreasing the nominal interest rate from 10% to 0% leads to a welfare gain that is equivalent to a permanent increase in consumption of 2.82% (2.38%) under endogenous (exogenous) human capital accumulation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Chu gratefully acknowledges the financial support from the Thousand Talents Program by the Shanghai Municipal Government. Ning is grateful to the support by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SUFE) (2017110133) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2017M611515). Zhu acknowledges the financial support from the Key Laboratory of Mathematical Economics at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

REFERENCES

Abel, A. (1985) Dynamic behavior of capital accumulation in a cash-in-advance model. Journal of Monetary Economics 16, 5571.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Akcigit, U. (2012) Intellectual property rights policy, competition and innovation. Journal of the European Economic Association 10, 142.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60, 323351.Google Scholar
Arawatari, R., Hori, T., and Mino, K. (2016) On the Nonlinear Relationship between Inflation and Growth: A Theoretical Exposition. KIER discussion paper no. 950.Google Scholar
Berentsen, A., Breu, M., and Shi, S. (2012) Liquidity, innovation, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 59, 721737.Google Scholar
Booth, G. and Ciner, C. (2001) The relationship between nominal interest rates and inflation: International evidence. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 11, 269280.Google Scholar
Chen, H. (2015) Innovation and Imitation in a Product-Cycle Model with FDI and Cash-in-Advance Constraints. MPRA paper no. 65744.Google Scholar
Chu, A. and Cozzi, G. (2014) R&D and economic growth in a cash-in-advance economy. International Economic Review 55, 507524.Google Scholar
Chu, A., Cozzi, G., Lai, C., and Liao, C. (2015) Inflation, R&D and growth in an open economy. Journal of International Economics 96, 360374.Google Scholar
Chu, A. and Ji, L. (2016) Monetary policy and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20, 11271145.Google Scholar
Chu, A., Kan, K., Lai, C., and Liao, C. (2014) Money, random matching and endogenous growth: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 41, 173187.Google Scholar
Chu, A. and Lai, C. (2013) Money and the welfare cost of inflation in an R&D growth model. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45, 233249.Google Scholar
Cozzi, G. (2007) The arrow effect under competitive R&D. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Contributions) 7, Article 2.Google Scholar
Cozzi, G., Giordani, P., and Zamparelli, L. (2007) The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory 136, 788797.Google Scholar
Eicher, T. (1996) Interaction between endogenous human capital and technological change. Review of Economic Studies 63, 127144.Google Scholar
Funk, P. and Kromen, B. (2010) Inflation and innovation-driven growth. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 10, 152.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. and Shapiro, C. (1990) Optimal patent length and breadth. RAND Journal of Economics 21, 106112.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58, 4361.Google Scholar
Huang, C., Chang, J., and Ji, L. (2015) Inflation, Market Structure, and Innovation-Driven Growth with Various Cash Constraints. IEAS working paper no. 13-A012.Google Scholar
Iwaisako, T. and Futagami, K. (2013) Patent protection, capital accumulation, and economic growth. Economic Theory 52, 631668.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1995) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 495525.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1999) Growth: With or without scale effects. American Economic Review 89, 139144.Google Scholar
Jones, C. and Williams, J. (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 6585.Google Scholar
Li, C.-W. (2001) On the policy implications of endogenous technological progress. Economic Journal 111, C164C179.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., and Weil, D. (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407437.Google Scholar
Marquis, M. and Reffett, K. (1994) New technology spillovers into the payment system. Economic Journal 104, 11231138.Google Scholar
Mishkin, F. (1992) Is the Fisher effect for real? A reexamination of the relationship between inflation and interest rates. Journal of Monetary Economics 30, 195215.Google Scholar
Peretto, P. (1998) Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 283311.Google Scholar
Prettner, K. and Strulik, H. (2016) Technology, trade, and growth: The role of education. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20, 13811394.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98, S71S102.Google Scholar
Segerstrom, P. (1998) Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review 5, 12901310.Google Scholar
Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E. (1990) A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review 80, 10771091.Google Scholar
Stockman, A. (1981) Anticipated inflation and the capital stock in a cash-in-advance economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 8, 387393.Google Scholar
Strulik, H., Prettner, K., and Prskawetz, A. (2013) The past and future of knowledge-based growth. Journal of Economic Growth 18, 411437.Google Scholar
Trimborn, T., Koch, K. J., and Steger, T. M. (2008) Multi-dimensional transitional dynamics: A simple numerical procedure. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 301319.Google Scholar
Vaona, A. (2012) Inflation and growth in the long run: A new Keynesian theory and further semiparametric evidence. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 94132.Google Scholar
Venturini, F. (2012) Looking into the black box of Schumpeterian growth theories: An empirical assessment of R&D races. European Economic Review 56, 15301545.Google Scholar
Zeng, J. (1997) Physical and human capital accumulation, R&D and economic growth. Southern Economic Journal 63, 10231038.Google Scholar
Zeng, J. (2003) Reexamining the interactions between innovation and capital accumulation. Journal of Macroeconomics 25, 541560.Google Scholar