Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:57:10.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENDOGENOUS GROWTH AND HOUSEHOLD LEVERAGE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2017

Emily C. Marshall ,
Hoang Nguyen  and
Paul Shea
Emily C. Marshall
Affiliation:
Dickinson College
Hoang Nguyen
Affiliation:
Bates College
Paul Shea*
Affiliation:
Bates College
*
Address correspondence to: Paul Shea, Bates College, 270 Pettengill Hall, Lewiston, ME 04210USA; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We add households with heterogeneous discount factors and constrained credit to a research and development (R&D)-based endogenous growth model. Borrowers' access to credit has profound implications for growth. The direction and magnitude of this effect depend on preferences over labor supply. If labor supply is highly elastic and households do not smooth their labor supply between labor that produces output and R&D, annual growth decreases from 11.6% to approximately zero as the debt-to-capital ratio rises from 0 to 1.38. If households instead have a strong preference for smoothing their labor supply, then growth increases from 2.91% to 3.83% as the debt-to-capital ratio rises from 0 to 1.55. In both cases, less elastic labor supply weakens these effects. The results are similar if existing ideas do not affect the creation of new ideas. Now, when households do not smooth their labor supply, less debt results in faster growth, and productivity and output converge to much higher values.

Keywords

Credit ConstraintsHeterogeneous AgentsFinancial MarketsEndogenous Growth
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , July 2019 , pp. 2089 - 2113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D. and Zilibotti, F. (1997) Was prometheus unbound by chance? Risk, diversification, and growth. Journal of Political Economy 105 (4), 709–751.Google Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60, 323–351.Google Scholar
Amable, B., Chatelain, J.-B., and Ralf, K. (2004) Credit rationing, profit accumulation and economic growth. Economics Letters 85 (3), 301–307.Google Scholar
Ates, Sina T. and Saffie, Felipe E. (2016) Fewer but Better: Sudden Stops, Firm Entry, and Financial Selection. International Finance discussion papers no. 1187.Google Scholar
Bencivenga, V. R. and Smith, B. D. (1991) Financial intermediation and endogenous growth. Review of Economic Studies 58 (2), 195–209.Google Scholar
Bencivenga, V. R. and Smith, B. D. (1993). Some consequences of credit rationing in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 17 (1–2), 97–122.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. J. and Kahn, C. M. (1980) The solution of linear difference models under rational expectations. Econometrica 48 (5), 1305–1311.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Guren, A., Manoli, D., and Weber, A. (2013) Does indivisible labor explain the difference between micro and macro elasticities? A meta-analysis of extensive margin elasticities. In Acemoglu, D., Parker, J., and Woodford, M. (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2012, vol. 27, pp. 1–56. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comin, D. and Gertler, M. (2006) Medium-term economic cycles. American Economic Review 96 (3), 523–551.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991a) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991b) Quality ladders and product cycles. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2), 557–586.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991c) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58 (1), 43–61.Google Scholar
Guerron-Quintana, P. A. and Jinnai, R. (2015) Financial Frictions, Trends, and the Great Recession. Discussion paper series HIAS-E-14, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
Iacoviello, M. (2005) House prices, borrowing constraints, and monetary policy in the business cycle. American Economic Review 95 (3), 739–764.Google Scholar
Jappelli, T. and Pagano, M. (1994) Saving, growth, and liquidity constraints. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (1), 83–109.Google Scholar
Jones, C. I. (1995) R & D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103 (4), 759–784.Google Scholar
Jones, C. I. (2002) Sources of U.S. economic growth in a world of ideas. American Economic Review 92 (1), 220–239.Google Scholar
Kiyotaki, N. and Moore, J. (1997) Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy 105 (2), 211–248.Google Scholar
Levine, R. (2005) Finance and growth: Theory and evidence. Handbook of Economic Growth 1, 865–934.Google Scholar
Marshall, E. and Shea, P. (2017) Housing and Endogenous Default. Mimeo, Dickinson College and Bates College.Google Scholar
Mian, A. R., Sufi, A., and Verner, E. (2015) Household Debt and Business Cycles Worldwide. National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 21581.Google Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5), S71–S102.Google Scholar