Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:31:22.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DEBT POLICY RULE, UTILITY-GENERATING GOVERNMENT SPENDING, AND INDETERMINACY OF THE TRANSITION PATH IN AN AK MODEL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Takeo Hori
Affiliation:
Tokyo Institute of Technology
Noritaka Maebayashi*
Affiliation:
The University of Kitakyushu
*
Address correspondence to: Noritaka Maebayashi, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, the University of Kitakyushu, 4-2-1 Kitagata, Kokura Minami-ku, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 802-8577, Japan; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

This study examines the effects of borrowing for public services that increase households' utility (i.e., utility-generating government services) in an AK endogenous growth model. We assume that the government has a target debt ratio. The European Union and the United Kingdom adopt such debt policy rules. We find that application of a debt policy rule into utility-generating government spending causes indeterminacy of the transition path. We point out that the level of the target debt ratio, the tax rate, and the household utility parameters are important determinants of indeterminacy when considering utility-generating government services.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank the editor, the associate editor, and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the earlier version of this paper. We also gratefully acknowledge Koichi Futagami, Tarishi Matsuoka, Akihisa Shibata, Kozo Ueda, and seminar participants at Otaru University of Commerce and The University of Kitakyushu. This study was conducted while the first author was in Aoyamagakuin University. We are responsible for any remaining errors.

References

REFERENCES

Barro, Robert J. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, S103S125.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Sala-i-Martin, Xavier (2004) Economic Growth, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fernández, Esther, Novales, Alfonso, and Ruiz, Jesús (2004) Indeterminacy under non-separability of public consumption and leisure in the utility function. Economic Modelling 21, 409428.Google Scholar
Futagami, Koichi, Iwaisako, Tatsuro, and Ohdoi, Ryoji (2008) Debt policy rule, productive government spending, and multiple growth paths. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 445462.Google Scholar
Guo, Jang-Ting and Harrison, Sharon G. (2008) Useful government spending and macroeconomic (in)stability under balanced-budget rules. Journal of Public Economic Theory 10, 383397.Google Scholar
Maebayashi, Noritaka, Hori, Takeo, and Futagami, Koichi (2015) Dynamic Analysis of Reductions in Public Debt in an Endogenous Growth Model With Public Capital. Discussion papers in economics and business, 12-08-Rev.3, Osaka University (accepted for publication in Macroeconomic Dynamics).Google Scholar
Minea, Alexandru and Villieu, Patrick (2012) Persistent deficit, growth, and indeterminacy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 16, 267283.Google Scholar
Minea, Alexandru and Villieu, Patrick (2013) Debt policy rule, productive government spending, and multiple growth paths: A note. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 947954.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Keiichi, Hori, Takeo, Noritaka Maebayashi, and Koichi Futagami (2017) Debt policy rules in an open economy. Journal of Public Economic Theory 19, 158177.Google Scholar
Ni, Shawn (1995) An empirical analysis on the substitutability between private consumption and government purchases. Journal of Monetary Economics 36, 593605.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94, 10021037.Google Scholar
Taxation and Customs Union and Eurostat (2014) Taxation Trends in the European Union: Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and Norway, 2014 ed. Eurostat Statistical Books. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar