Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:57:43.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTRACTIONARY EFFECTS OF GOVERNMENT SPENDING AND WARTIME BRITAIN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

Shingo Watanabe
Shingo Watanabe*
Affiliation:
Bank of Japan
*
Please address correspondence to: Shingo Watanabe, Bank of Japan, 2-1-1 Nihonbashi-Hongokucho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-8660, Japan; e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In dynamic general equilibrium models, private output is increased by government spending for goods and services, but decreased by government spending for employment. This paper presents the first evidence for the latter effect by studying the pre-WWII British wartime economy. Britain participated in numerous wars, increasing military employment greatly. British tax-smoothing policy and rare wartime governmental interventions reduce the difficulty of studying the effects of wartime government spending. This paper finds wartime decreases in industrial production, which can be explained by wartime government spending for military employment.

Keywords

Government SpendingEmploymentWarOutput
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , June 2016 , pp. 857 - 883
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barro, Robert J. (1987) Government spending, interest rates, prices, and budget deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701–1918. Journal of Monetary Economics 20, 221–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Redlick, Charles L. (2011) Macroeconomic effects from government purchases and taxes. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 51–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Marianne and King, Robert G. (1993) Fiscal policy in general equilibrium. American Economic Review 83, 315–334.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D. and Kydland, Finn E. (1996) The gold standard as a commitment mechanism. In Bayoumi, Tamim, Eichengreen, Barry, and Taylor, Mark P. (eds.), Modern Perspectives on the Gold Standard, pp. 55–100. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Michael D. and White, Eugene N. (1991) A tale of two currencies: British and French Finance during the Napoleonic Wars. Journal of Economic History 51, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, R. Anton and McGrattan, Ellen R. (1993) The macroeconomics of war and peace. In Blanchard, Olivier and Fischer, Stanley (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1993, pp. 197–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burnside, Craig, Eichenbaum, Martin, and Fisher, Jonas D.M. (2004) Fiscal shocks and their consequences. Journal of Economic Theory 115, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, Michele (2005) Government Employment Expenditure and the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper series, 2005–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gregory (2001) Debt, deficits, and crowding out: England, 1727–1840. European Review of Economic History 5, 403–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clode, Charles M. (1869) The Military Forces of the Crown: Their Administration and Government. London: J. Murray.Google Scholar
Cooley, Thomas F. and Ohanian, Lee E. (1997) Postwar British economic growth and the legacy of Keynes. Journal of Political Economy 105, 439–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R. and Harley, Knick (1992) Output growth and the British Industrial Revolution: A restatement of the Crafts–Harley view. Economic History Review 45, 703–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, Phyllis and Cole, W. A. (1967) British Economic Growth, 1688–1959. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles H. (1972) National income, expenditure and output of the United Kingdom 1855–1965. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finn, Mary G. (1998) Cyclical effects of government's employment and goods purchases. International Economic Review 39, 635–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, Jeffrey A. (1982) The 1807–1809 embargo against Great Britain. Journal of Economic History 42, 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homer, Sidney (1977) A History of Interest Rates, 2nd ed.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Howat, G. M. D. (ed.) (1973) Dictionary of World History. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Hueckel, Glenn (1973) War and the British economy, 1793–1815, a general equilibrium analysis. Explorations in Economic History 10, 365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, J. P. (ed.) (1981) A Dictionary of British History. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Linnemann, Ludger (2009) Macroeconomic effects of shocks to public employment. Journal of Macroeconomics 31, 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankiw, N. Gregory (2002) Macroeconomics, 5th ed.New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
McGrattan, Ellen R. and Ohanian, Lee E. (2010) Does neoclassical theory account for the effects of big fiscal shocks? Evidence from World War II. International Economic Review 51, 509–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Brian R. (1988) British Historical Statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel (1987) Has the Industrial Revolution been crowded out? Some reflections on Crafts and Williamson. Explorations in Economic History 24, 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohanian, Lee E. (1997) The macroeconomic effects of war finance in the United States: World War II and the Korean War. American Economic Review 87, 23–40.Google Scholar
Pappa, Evi (2009) The effects of fiscal shocks on employment and the real wage. International Economic Review 50, 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perotti, Robert. (2008) In search of the transmission mechanism of fiscal policy. In Acemoglu, Daron, Rogoff, Kenneth, and Woodford, Michael (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2007, pp. 169–226. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramey, Valerie A. (2011) Identifying government spending shocks: It's all in the timing. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, Valerie A. (2013) Government spending and private activity. In Alesina, Alberto and Giavazzi, Francesco (eds.), Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ramey, Valerie A. and Shapiro, Matthew D. (1998) Costly capital reallocation and the effects of government spending. Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 48, 145–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, David (2006) Advanced Macroeconomics. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Google Scholar
Rossi, Barbara and Zubairy, Sarah (2011) What is the importance of monetary and fiscal shocks in explaining U.S. macroeconomic fluctuations? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43, 1247–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotemberg, Julio J. and Woodford, Michael (1992) Oligopolistic pricing and the effects of aggregate demand on economic activity. Journal of Political Economy 100, 1153–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John (1972) Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In Bruce, Russett (ed.), Peace, War, and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stokey, Nancy L. (2001) A quantitative model of the British Industrial Revolution, 1780–1850. Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 55, 55–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temin, Peter and Voth, Hans-Joachim (2005) Credit rationing and crowding out during the Industrial Revolution: Evidence from Hoare's Bank, 1702–1862. Explorations in Economic History 42, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watterau, B. (ed.) (1983) Macmillan Concise Dictionary of World History. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. (1984) Why was British growth so slow during the Industrial Revolution? Journal of Economic History 44, 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, Mark (1992) The Analysis of Fiscal Policy in Neoclassical Models. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas research paper 9212.Google Scholar