Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:38:13.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Co-integration with score-driven models: an application to US real GDP growth, US inflation rate, and effective federal funds rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2021

Szabolcs Blazsek ,
Alvaro Escribano  and
Adrian Licht
Szabolcs Blazsek
Affiliation:
School of Business, Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Guatemala City (Guatemala), Guatemala
Alvaro Escribano*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Getafe (Madrid), Spain
Adrian Licht
Affiliation:
School of Business, Universidad Francisco Marroquín, Guatemala City (Guatemala), Guatemala
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nonlinear co-integration is studied for score-driven models, using a new multivariate dynamic conditional score/generalized autoregressive score model. The model is named t-QVARMA (quasi-vector autoregressive moving average model), which is a location model for the multivariate t-distribution. In t-QVARMA, I(0) and co-integrated I(1) components of the dependent variables are included. For t-QVARMA, the conditions of the maximum likelihood estimator and impulse response functions (IRFs) are presented. A limiting special case of t-QVARMA, named Gaussian-QVARMA, is a Gaussian-VARMA specification with I(0) and I(1) components. As an empirical application, the US real gross domestic product growth, US inflation rate, and effective federal funds rate are studied for the period of 1954 Q3 to 2020 Q2. Statistical performance and predictive accuracy of t-QVARMA are superior to those of Gaussian-VAR. Estimates of the short-run IRF, long-run IRF, and total IRF impacts for the US data are reported.

Keywords

Nonlinear co-integrationnonlinear common trendsdynamic conditional score (DCS)generalized autoregressive score (GAS)quasi-vector autoregressive moving average (QVARMA)62M1091B84
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 203 - 223
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Blasques, F., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A. (2015) Information-theoretic optimality of observation-driven time series models for continuous responses. Biometrika 102(2), 325–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasques, F., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A. (2017) Maximum likelihood estimation for score-driven models. TI 2014-029/III Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. https://papers.tinbergen.nl/14029.pdf.Google Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31(3), 307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollerslev, T. (1987) A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for security prices and rates of return data. Review of Economics and Statistics 69(3), 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, B., Parisio, L., Pelagatti, M., and Baldi, F. (2010) Long-run relations in European electricity prices. Journal of Applied Econometrics 25(5), 805–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1970) Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Brandt, A. (1986) The stochastic equation $${Y_{n + 1}} = {A_n}{Y_n} + {B_n}$$ with stationary coefficients. Advances in Applied Probability 18(1), 211–220.Google Scholar
Caivano, M. and Harvey, A. (2014) Time series models with an EGB2 conditional distribution. Journal of Time Series Analysis 35(6), 558–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L. J., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C. L.. Monetary policy shocks: what have we learned and to what end? Handbook of Macroeconomics 1(A), 65–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1981) Statistical analysis of time series: some recent developments. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 8(2), 93–115.Google Scholar
Creal, D., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A. (2008) A general framework for observation driven time-varying parameter models. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 08-108/4. https://www.tinbergen.nl/discussion-paper/2649/08-108-4-a-general-framework-for-observation-driven-time-varying-parameter-models CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creal, D., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A. (2011) A dynamic multivariate heavy-tailed model for time-varying volatilities and correlations. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 29(4), 552–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creal, D., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A. (2013) Generalized autoregressive score models with applications. Journal of Applied Econometrics 28(5), 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creal, D., Schwaab, B., Koopman, S. J., and Lucas, A. (2014) Observation-driven mixed-measurement dynamic factor models with an application to credit risk. The Review of Economics and Statistics 96(5), 898–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, R. M., Amsler, C., and Schmidt, P. (2007) A robust version of the KPSS test based on indicators. Journal Econometrics 137(2), 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74(366), 427–431.Google Scholar
Elton, J. H. (1990) A multiplicative ergodic theorem for Lipschitz maps. Stochastic Processes and their Applications 34(1), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. F. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica 50(4), 987–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2), 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escanciano, J.-C. and Escribano, A. (2008) Econometrics: Nonlinear cointegration. In Meyers, R. A. (ed.), Complex Systems in Finance and Econometrics, pp. 203–215. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Escribano, A. (2004) Nonlinear error correction: The case of money demand in the United Kingdom (1878–2000). Macroeconomic Dynamics 8(1), 76–116.Google Scholar
Escribano, A., Peña, J. I, and Villaplana, P. (2011) Modeling electricity prices: international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 73(5), 622–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escribano, A., Sipols, A. E., and Aparicio, F. (2006) Nonlinear cointegration and nonlinear error correction: Record counting cointegration tests. Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation 35(4), 939–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escribano, A., Sipols, A. E., and Teresa Santos, M. (2008) Testing for cointegration using induced-order statistics. Computational Statistics 23, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franses, P. H. and Lucas, A. (1998) Outlier detection in cointegration analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 16(4), 459–468.Google Scholar
Giacomini, R. and White, H. (2006) Tests of conditional predicitve ability. Econometrica 74(6), 1545–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. (1981) Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Journal of Econometrics 16(1), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A. C. (2013) Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A. C. and Chakravarty, T. (2008) Beta-t-(E)GARCH. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0840, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe0840.pdf Google Scholar
Herwartz, H. and Lütkepohl, H. (2000) Multivariate volatility analysis of VW stock prices. International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management 9(1), 35–54.Google Scholar
Johansen, S. (1995) Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. (1995a) An outlier robust unit root test with an application to the extended Nelson-Plosser data. Journal of Econometrics 66(1–2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. (1995b) Unit root test based on M-estimators. Econometric Theory 11(2), 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. (1997) Cointegration testing using pseudolikelihood ratio tests. Econometric Theory 13(2), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. (1998) Inference on cointegrating ranks using LR and LM tests based on pseudo-likelihoods. Econometric Reviews 17(2), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lütkepohl, H. (2005) New Introduction to Multivariate Time Series Analysis. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, D. B. (1991) Conditonal heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59(2), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyblom, J. and Harvey, A. (2000) Tests of common stochastic trends. Econometric Theory 16(2), 176–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peersman, G. (2005) What caused the early millennium slowdown? Evidence based on vector autoregressions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 20(2), 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio-Ramirez, J. F., Waggoner, D. F., and Zha, T. (2010) Structural vector autoregressions: Theory for identification and algorithms for inference. Review of Economic Studies 77(2), 665–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straumann, D. and Mikosch, T. (2006) Quasi-maximum-likelihood estimation in conditionally heteroscedastic time series: A stochastic recurrence equations approach. The Annals of Statistics 34(1), 2449–2495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiao, G. C. and Tsay, R. S. (1989) Model specification in multivariate time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 51(2), 157–213.Google Scholar
White, H. (1984) Asymptotic Theory for Econometricians. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Blazsek et al. supplementary material

Blazsek et al. supplementary material

Download Blazsek et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 702.6 KB