Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T13:39:41.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A ROLE FOR CULTURAL TRANSMISSION IN FERTILITY TRANSITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2009

Thomas Baudin*
Affiliation:
Center for Operation Research and Econometrics and Institut de Recherches Economique et Sociales
*
Address correspondence to: Thomas Baudin, Bureau b.117, Voie du Roman Pays 34, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Cultural variables in economic analysis have recently experienced a strong renewal. This evolution sheds a new light on the old debate between the “Beckerian model” of fertility and the “synthesis model” of fertility. In this paper, I propose a fertility model making the evolution of culture endogenous. The whole population is divided into two cultures corresponding to specific preferences for fertility. Parents decide their fertility rate and try to transmit their culture to their children. Differential fertility between cultures gives rise to an evolutionary process while differential effort to transmit the parental culture gives rise to a cultural process. The long-run distribution of preferences and the average total fertility rate both result from interactions between these processes. As a result, a fertility transition cannot appear without productivity shocks in favor of the culture that is not biased toward quantity of children. However, asymmetric productivity shocks are not always sufficient to cause a fertility transition.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adserá, Alicia (2006) Marital fertility and religion: Recent changes in Spain, 1985 and 1989. Population Studies 60 (2), 205221.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Giuliano, Paola (2007) The Power of the Family. NBER working paper 13051, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, S., Diamond, I., and Steele, F. (1997) Contraception and religiosity in Bangladesh. In Jones, G. W., Douglas, R. M., Caldwell, J. C., and D'Souza, R. M. (eds.), The Continuing Demographic Transition, pp. 268289. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ashraf, Quamrul and Galor, Oded (2007) Cultural Assimilation, Cultural Diffusion and the Origin of the Wealth of Nations. CEPR Discussion Papers 6444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bairoch, Paul (1997) Victoires et déboires: Histoire économique et sociale du monde du XVIè siècle à nos jours, vols. I, II, and III. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Baudin, Thomas (2008) Religion and Fertility: The French Connection. CES Working Paper v08089, Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1).Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Barro, Robert J. (1988) A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 103 (1), 125.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Lewis, H. Gregg (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81 (2) [Part 2. New economic approach to fertility], 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Tomes, Nigel (1976) Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 84 (4) [Part 2, Essays in labor economics in honor of H.G. Lewis], 143162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter L. (1973) The Social Reality of Religion, pp. 112118, 132–139. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin University Books.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, Ted C. and Stark, Oded (1993) How altruism can prevail in an evolutionary environment. American Economic Review 83 (2), 149155.Google Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy (1988) Economic approach to population growth. In Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 1, chap. 12, pp. 477–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisin, Alberto and Verdier, Thierry (2001) The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamic of preferences. Journal of Economic Theory 97, 298319.Google Scholar
De La Croix, David and Doepke, Matthias (2003) Inequality and growth: Why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review 93 (4), 10911113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doepke, Matthias and Zilibotti, Fabirizio (2008) Occupational choice and the spirit of capitalism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2), 747793.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. (1978) The economics and sociology of fertility: A synthesis. In Tilley, C. (ed.), Historical Studies of Changing Fertility. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A, Pollak, R. A., and Wachter, M. C. (1980) Toward a more general economic model of fertility determination: Endogenous preferences and natural fertility. In Easterlin, R. A. (ed.), Population and Economic Change in Developing Countries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fan, Shenggen and Zhang, Xiaobo (2004) Public investment and regional inequality in rural China. Agricultural Economics 30 (2), 89100.Google Scholar
Fernández, Raquel and Fogli, Alessandra (2007) Women, work, and culture. Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (2–3), 305332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, Oded (2005a) From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. In Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, first ed., vol. 1, chap. 4, pp. 171293. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded (2005b) The demographic transition and the emergence of sustained economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association 3, 494504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, Oded and Moav, Omer (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 11331192.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Weil, David N. (1996) The gender gap, fertility, and growth. American Economic Review 86 (3), 374387.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded and Weil, David N. (1999) From Malthusian stagnation to modern growth. American Economic Review 89 (2), 150154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grusec, Joan E. and Kuczynski, Leon (1997) Parenting and Children's Internalization of Values: A Handbook of Contemporary Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Guiso, Luigi, Sapienza, Paola, and Zingales, Luigi (2006) Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2), 2348.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. David (1999) Child naming, religion and the decline of marital fertility in nineteenth century America. History of the Family 4 (3), 339365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Susan and Hauser, Robert M. (1981) Religion, socialization, and fertility. Demography 18, 511528.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, Ron J. (1977) The Decline of Belgian Fertility, 1800–1970. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, Ron J. and Wilson, Chris (1986) Modes of production, secularization and the pace of the fertility decline in Western Europe, 1870–1930. In Watkins, S. and Coale, A. J. (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neven, Michel and Oris, Muriel (2003) Contrôle religieux, contrôle social. La fécondité dans l'Est de la Belgique dans la seconde moitié du 19e siècle. Annales de Démographie historique 115 (2), 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamon, Sonya (1992) Prairie patrimony: Family, farming, and community in the Midwest. In Studies in Rural Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, Angelo and Van Poppel, Frans (2003) Catholic priests and the fertility transition among Dutch Catholics, 1935–1970. Annales de Démographie Historique 106 (2), 89109.Google Scholar
Spengler, Joseph J. (1954) Économie et population. Les doctrines françaises avant 1800. INED, Travaux et documents, Cahier 21.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, Jan and Kok, Jan (2005) The role of religion in the Dutch marital fertility transition. Starting, spacing and stopping in the heart of the Netherlands, 1845–1945. Continuity and Change 20 (2), 247263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Heek, F. (1956) Roman Catholicism and fertility in the Netherlands: Demographic aspects of minority status. Population Studies 10 (2), 125138.Google Scholar
Van Poppel, Frans (1985) Late fertility decline in the Netherlands: The influence of religious denomination, socioeconomic group and region. European Journal of Population 1 (4), 347373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. B. and Zimmer, B. G. (1990) The changing influence of religion on US fertility: Evidence from Rhode Island. Demography 27 (3), 475481.Google Scholar