Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T05:53:20.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the effects of taxation on growth: an empirical assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2022

Marco Alfò ,
Lorenzo Carbonari  and
Giovanni Trovato
Marco Alfò
Affiliation:
Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy
Lorenzo Carbonari*
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata,” DEF and CEIS, Rome, Italy
Giovanni Trovato
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata,” DEF and CEIS, Rome, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: (+ 39) 06 7259 5708.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the effects of taxation on the growth rate of the real per capita GDP in a sample of 21 OECD countries, over the period 1965–2010. To do this, we estimate a version of the model proposed by Mankiw, Romer and Weil [(1992) Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407–437.] augmented to consider both direct and indirect effects of taxation on investment share parameters. We employ a semi-parametric technique—namely, a Finite Mixture Model—which combines features from mixed effect models for panel data and cluster analysis methods to account for country-specific unobserved heterogeneity. Our results suggest that taxes have a negative impact on growth: in the baseline model, the coefficient estimates indicate that a 10% cut in personal income tax rate (respectively corporate income tax rate) may raise the GDP growth rate by 0.6% (respectively 0.3%).

Keywords

Economic growthtaxationfinite mixture modelclassification
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , July 2023 , pp. 1289 - 1318
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We thank two anonymous reviewers of this Journal for their valuable comments on the manuscript. We also thank Alberto Bucci and Pietro Peretto for their kind suggestions. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

Aitkin, M. (1997) Contribution to the discussion paper by S. Richardson and P.J. Green. Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, B 59, 764–768.Google Scholar
Aitkin, M., Francis, B. and Hinde, J. (2005) Statistical Modelling in GLIM. 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aitkin, M. and Rocci, R. (2005) A general maximum likelihood analysis of measurement error in generalized linear models. Statistics and Computing 12(2), 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akaike, H. (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Akaike, H. (eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267–281. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar
Alfò, M. and Trovato, G. (2004) Semiparametric mixture models for multivariate count data, with application. Econometrics Journal 7(2), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfò, M., Trovato, G. and Waldmann, R. (2008) Testing for country heterogeneity in growth models using a finite mixture approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 23, 487–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angelopoulos, K., Economides, G. and Kammas, P. (2007) Tax-spending policies and economic growth: Theoretical predictions and evidence from the OECD. European Journal of Political Economy 23(4), 885–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arminger, G., Stein, P. and Wittenberg, Jörg (1999) Mixtures of conditional mean- And covariance-structure models. Psychometrika 64(4), 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. (2008) Do tax structures affect aggregate economic growth? Empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 643.Google Scholar
Arnold, J., Brys, B., Heady, C., Johansson, Åsa, Schwellnus, C. and Vartia, L. (2011) Tax policy for economic recovery and growth. Economic Journal 121(550), F59–F80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98(5, Part 2), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. (2001) Human capital and growth. American Economic Review 91(2), 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleaney, M. F., Gemmell, N. and Kneller, R. (2001) Testing the endogenous growth model: Public expenditure, taxation, and growth over the long-run. Canadian Journal of Economics 34(1), 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, R. and Stoker, T. M. (2005) Heterogeneity and aggregation? Journal of Economic Literature 43(2), 347–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodzogan, H. (1994) Mixture-model cluster analysis using model selection criteria and a new informational measure of complexity. In: Bodzogan, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the First US/Japan Conference on the Frontiers of Statistical Modelling: An Informational Approach, Volume 2: Multivariate Statistical Modeling, pp. 69–113. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Bond, S., Hoeffler, A. and Temple, J. (2001) GMM Estimation of Empirical Growth Models, Discussion Paper No. 2048, Centre for Economic Policy Research Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Saez, E. and Shephard, A. (2010) Means testing and tax rates on earnings. In: J. Mirrlees, S. Adam, T. Besley, R. Blundell, S. Bond, R. Chote, M. Gammie, P. Johnson, G. Myles and J. Poterba (eds.), Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, pp. 90–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press for Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Brock William, A. and Durlauf, S. N. (2001) What have we learned from a decade of empirical research on growth? Growth empirics and reality. The World Bank Economic Review 15(2), 229–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucci, A., Carbonari, L. and Trovato, G. (2021) Variety, competition, and population in economic growth: Theory and empirics. Macroeconomic Dynamics 25(5), 1303–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F. (2005) Accounting for cross-Country income differences. Handbook of Economic Growth 1 (Part A), 679–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies 47(1), 225–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, G. (1984) Panel data. In: Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 2, pp. 1247–1318.Google Scholar
Chudik, A. and Hashem Pesaran, M. (2015) Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics 188(2), 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Cole, E. B., Durlauf, S. N. and Rondina, G. (2012) Nonlinearities in growth: From evidence to policy. Journal of Macroeconomics 34(1), 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daveri, F. and Tabellini, G. (2000) Unemployment, growth and taxation in industrial countries. Economic Policy 30(30), 47–104.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. D. and MacKinnon, J. G. (1993) Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. N. (2000) Econometric analysis and the study of economic growth: A skeptical perspective. In: Durlauf, S. N. (eds.), Macroeconomics and the Real World, Volume 1. Econometric Techniques and Macroeconomics, pp. 249–261, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. N. (2005) Complexity and empirical economics. Economic Journal 115(504), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlauf, S. N., Johnson, P. A. and Temple, J. (2005) Growth econometrics. In: Handbook of Economic Growth, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. N., Kourtellos, A. and Minkin, A. (2001) The local solow growth model. European Economic Review 45(4-6), 928–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. (1993) Marginal income tax rates and economic growth in developing countries. European Economic Review 37(2-3), 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engen, E. M. and Skinner, J. S. (1992) Fiscal policy and growth. NBER working paper no. 4223.Google Scholar
Engen, E. M. and Skinner, J. S. (1996) Taxation and economic growth. NBER working paper no. 5826.Google Scholar
Fraley, C. and Raftery, A. E. (2002) Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(458), 611–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulginiti, L. E. and Perrin, R. K. (1993) Prices and productivity in agriculture. Review of Economics and Statistics 75(3), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, N., Kneller, R. and Sanz, I. (2011) The timing and persistence of fiscal policy impacts on growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Economic Journal 121(550), F33–F58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gemmell, N., Kneller, R. and Sanz, I. (2013) The growth effects of tax rates in the OECD. Canadian Journal of Economics 47(4), 1217–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glomm, G. and Ravikumar, B. (1997) Productive government expenditure and long-run growth. Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control 21(1), 183–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauk, W. R. (2017) Endogeneity bias and growth regressions. Journal of Macroeconomics 51(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaimovich, N. and Rebelo, S. (2017) Nonlinear effects of taxation on growth. Journal of Political Economy 125(1), 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. E. and Manuelli, R. E. (1990) A convex model of equilibrium growth: Theory and policy implications. Journal of Political Economy 98(5, Part 1), 1008–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E. and Rossi, P. E. (1993) Optimal taxation in models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 101(3), 485–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S.-J. (1998) Growth effect of taxes in an endogenous growth model: To what extent do taxes affect economic growth? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23(1), 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, P. and Ventura, G. (2021) Taxation, expenditures and the irish miracle. Journal of Monetary Economics 117(2), 1062–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. F. and Gemmell, N. (1999) Fiscal policy and growth: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics 74(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koester, R. B. and Kormendi, R. C. (1989) Taxation, aggregate activity and economic growth: Cross? Country evidence on some supply? Side hypotheses. Economic Inquiry 27(3), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laird, N. M. (1978) Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation of a mixing distribution. Journal of American Statistical Association 73(364), 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. and Gordon, R. H. (2005) Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 89(5-6), 1027–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewbel, A. (1997) Constructing instruments for regressions with measurement error when no additional data are available, with an application to patents and R&D. Econometrica 65(5), 1201–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewbel, A. (2012) Using heteroscedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 30(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, B. G. (1983a) The geometry of mixture likelihoods: A general theory. Annals of Statistics 11(1), 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, B. G. (1983b) The geometry of mixture likelihoods. II. The exponential family. Annals of Statistics 11(3), 783–792.Google Scholar
Lindsay, B. G. and Lesperance, M. L. (1995) A review of semiparametric mixture models. Journal of statistical planning and inference 47(1-2), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1990) Supply-side economics: An analytical review. Oxford Economic Papers 42(2), 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, J. B., Minniti, A. and Venturini, F. (2021) The long-run investment effect of taxation in OECDCountries. NIESR Discussion Paper, No. 527.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., David , Romerand Weil, D. N. (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 407–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Vazquez, J., Vulovic, V. and Liu, Y. (2011) Direct versus indirect taxation: Trends, theory, and economic significance. In: Martinez-Vazquez, J., Vulovic, V. and Liu, Y. (eds.), The Elgar Guide to Tax Systems, pp. 37–92. Georgia State University , Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
McLachlan, G. and Peel, D. (2000) Finite Mixture Models, John Wiley & Sons Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, E. G., Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. and Asea, P. (1997) On the ineffectiveness of tax policy in altering long-run growth: Harberger’s superneutrality conjecture. Journal of Public Economics 66(1), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, E. G., Razin, A. and Tesar, L. (1994) Effective tax rates in macroeconomics: Cross-country estimates of tax rates on factor incomes and consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 34(3), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. and Roubini, N. (1998) Growth effects of income and consumption taxes. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30(4), 721–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundlak, Y. (1978) On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundlak, Y. (1988) Endogenous technology and the measurement of productivity. In: Mundlak, Y. (eds.), Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation, pp. 316–331. Washington, D.C: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Mundlak, Y., Butzer, R. and Larson, D. F. (2012) Heterogeneous technology and panel data: The case of the agricultural production function. Journal of Development Economics 99(1), 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. and Asparouhov, T. (2009) Multilevel regression mixture analysis. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, A 172(3), 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhaus, J. M. and McCulloch, C. E. (2006) Separating between- And within-cluster covariate effects by using conditional and partitioning methods. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B 68(5), 859–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, S.-K. and McLachlan, G. J. (2014) Mixture models for clustering multilevel growth trajectories. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 71, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2017) Fiscal database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Owen, A., Videras, J. and Davis, L. (2009) Do all countries follow the same growth process? Journal of Economic Growth 14(4), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padovano, F. and Galli, E. (2001) Tax rates and economic growth in the OECD countries (1950-1990. Economic Inquiry 39(1), 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padovano, F. and Galli, E. (2002) Comparing the growth effects of marginal vs. average tax rates and progressivity. European Journal of Political Economy 18(3), 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroni, P. (2007) Social capital, barriers to production and capital shares: Implications for the importance of parameter heterogeneity from a nonstationary panel approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22, 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, P. F. (2003) Fiscal policy and long-run growth in R&D-based models with endogenous market structure. Journal of Economic Growth 8(3), 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peretto, P. F. (2007) Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory 137(1), 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesaran, M. H. and Smith, R. (1995) Estimating Long-Run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Applied Econometrics 68(1), 79–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. C. B. and Sul, D. (2007) Some empirics on economic growth under heterogeneous technology. Journal of Macroeconomics 29(3), 455–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, T., Saez, E. and Stantcheva, S. (2014) Optimal taxation of top labor incomes: A tale of three elasticities. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(1), 230–271.Google Scholar
Pittau, M. G. P., Zelli, R. and Johnson, P. A. (2010) Mixture models, convergence clubs and polarization. Review of Income and Wealth 56(1), 101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebelo, S. (1991) Long-Run policy analysis and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 99(3), 500–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (2010) The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review 100(3), 763–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, C. D. and Romer, D. H. (2014) The incentive effects of marginal tax rates: Evidence from the interwar era. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(3), 242–281.Google Scholar
Schwarz, G. (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annal of Statistics 6(2), 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simar, L. (1976) Maximum likelihood estimation of a compound poisson process. Annal of Statistics 4(6), 1200–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokey, N. L. and Rebelo, S. (1995) Growth effects of flat-rate taxes. Journal of Political Economy 103(3), 519–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, G., Jan, K., Lee, K. and Pesaran, M. H. (2000) Cross-sectional aggregation of non-linear models. Journal of Econometrics 95(2), 285–331.Google Scholar
van der, P. and Frederick (2011) Natural resources: Curse or blessing? Journal of Economic Literature 49(2), 366–420.Google Scholar
Vegh, C. A. and Vuletin, G. (2015) How is tax policy conducted over the business cycle? American Economic Review 7(3), 327–370.Google Scholar
Wenli, L. and Sarte, P.-D. (2004) Progressive taxation and long-run growth. American Economic Review 94(5), 1705–1716.Google Scholar
Widmalm, F. (2001) Tax structure and growth: Are some taxes better than others? Public Choice 107(3/4), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wouterse, F. (2016) Can human capital variables be technology changing? An empirical test for rural households in Burkina Faso. Journal of Productivity Analysis 45(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar