Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:01:25.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MACROECONOMIC STABILIZATION AND LONG-TERM GROWTH: THE ROLE OF POLICY DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2019

Philipp Harting
Philipp Harting*
Affiliation:
Bielefeld University
*
Address correspondence to: Philipp Harting, Department for Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, PO Box 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do fiscal stabilization policies affect the long-term growth of the economy? If so, are the long-term effects growth enhancing or growth reducing? When addressing these questions from a theoretical perspective, the literature has typically emphasized the importance of structural aspects such as the modeling approach of endogenous technological change while paying less attention to an elaborate design of the considered fiscal stabilization policies. This paper uses an agent-based macroeconomic model that generates endogenous business cycles to emphasize the role of the policy design for long-term growth effects of stabilization policies. By comparing a demand-oriented consumption policy and two different investment subsidizing policies, it can be shown that these policies are successful in smoothing the business cycle but differ in terms of their effects on economic long-term growth. This highlights the importance of policy design for the analysis of long-term effects of stabilization policies.

Keywords

Stabilization PolicyLong-Term GrowthBusiness CycleAgent-Based Macroeconomics
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , June 2021 , pp. 924 - 969
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful for helpful comments and suggestions by two anonymous referees, Herbert Dawid, Eliana Lauretta, Michael Neugart, Andre R. Neveu, and Anna Zaharieva and by participants of the following workshops, conferences, and research seminars: Computing in Economics and Finance 2015, the 20th Annual Workshop on the Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents (WEHIA), the NYC Computational Economics & Complexity Workshop at the Eastern Economic Association Annual Meeting 2015, the GeComplexity Final Workshop 2016, the 2nd HenU/INFER Workshop on Applied Macroeconomics, and the GENED Annual Meeting 2013. I also thank my colleagues Sander van der Hoog and Simon Gemkow who co-developed and programmed parts of the computational model and the Center for Parallel Computing at the University of Paderborn for providing me with computational resources on the OCULUS high-performance computing cluster. Financial support of the German Science Foundation (Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 882 “From Heterogeneities to Inequalities”) and from the Horizon 2020 ISIGrowth Project (“Innovation-fuelled, Sustainable, Inclusive Growth”), under grant no. 649186, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

REFERENCES

Aghion, P., Hemous, D., and Kharroubi, E. (2014) Cyclical fiscal policy, credit constraints, and industry growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 62, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Saint-Paul, G. (1998a) Uncovering some causal relationships between productivity growth and the structure of economic fluctuations: A tentative survey. Labour 12, 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Saint-Paul, G. (1998b) Virtues of bad times interaction between productivity growth and economic fluctuations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 2, 322–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. W. and Carrol, C. D. (2001) Individual learning about consumption. Macroeconomic Dynamics 5, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annicchiarico, B. and Rossi, L. (2013) Optimal monetary policy in a New Keynesian model with endogenous growth. Journal of Macroeconomics 38, 274–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzoategui, D., Comin, D., Gertler, M., and Martinez, J. (2016) Endogenous technology adoption and R&D as sources of business cycle persistence. NBER Working Paper No. 22005, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, Q., Gershman, B., and Howitt, P. (2011) Banks, market organization, and macroeconomic performance: An agent-based computational analysis. NBER Working Paper No. 17102, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahk, B.-H. and Gort, M. (1993) Decomposing learning by doing in new plants. Journal of Political Economy 101, 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M. and King, R. G. (1999) Measuring business cycles: Approximate band-pass filters for economic time series. Review of Economics and Statistics 81, 575–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benaroch, M. and Kauffman, R. J. (1999) A case for using real option pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments. Information Systems Research 10, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, F., Kung, H., and Morales, G. (2018) Growth, slowdowns, and recoveries. Journal of Monetary Economics 101, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bils, M. and Chang, Y. (2000) Understanding how price responds to costs and production. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 52, 33–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, K. (1999) Can stabilisation policy reduce long-run growth? The Economic Journal 109, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, K. and Pelloni, A. (2005) Growth, cycles, and stabilization policy. Oxford Economic Papers 57, 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, O. J., Diamond, P., Hall, R. E., and Yellen, J. (1989) The beveridge curve. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1989, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Oliver J. (2008) The state of macro. NBER Working Paper No. 14259, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Broda, C. and Parker, J. A. (2014) The economic stimulus payments of 2008 and the aggregate demand for consumption. Journal of Monetary Economics 68, 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R. J. and Hammour, M. L. (1994) The cleansing effect of recessions. The American Economic Review 84, 1350–1368.Google Scholar
Carroll, C. D. and Summers, L. H. (1991) Consumption growth parallels income growth: Some new evidence. In: Douglas Bernheim, B. and Shoven, J. B. (eds.), National Saving and Economic Performance, pp. 305–348. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., Haltiwanger, J., and Willis, J. L. (2007) Search frictions: Matching aggregate and establishment observations. Journal of Monetary Economics 54, 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabušinskas, A., Kulikov, D., Randveer, M., et al. (2013) The impact of volatility on economic growth. Working paper, Bank of Estonia.Google Scholar
Dawid, H. and Delli Gatti, D. (2018) Agent-based macroeconomics. In: Hommes, C. and LeBaron, B. (eds.), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol.4, pp. 63–156. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dawid, H., Gemkow, S., Harting, P., van der Hoog, S., and Neugart, M. (2012) The Eurace@Unibi model: An agent-based macroeconomic model for economic policy design. Bielefeld Working Papers in Economics and Management No. 05-2012, Bielefeld University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, H. and Harting, P. (2012) Capturing firm behavior in agent-based models of industry evolution and macroeconomic dynamics. In: Bünsdorf, G. (ed.), Evolution, Organization and Economic Behavior. Edward-Elgar.Google Scholar
Dawid, H., Harting, P., and Neugart, M. (2014) Economic convergence: Policy implications from a heterogeneous agent model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 44, 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, H., Harting, P., and Neugart, M. (2018a) Cohesion policy and inequality dynamics: Insights from a heterogeneous agents macroeconomic model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 150, 220–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, H., Harting, P., and Neugart, M. (2018b) Fiscal transfers and regional economic growth. Review of International Economics 26, 651–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, H., Harting, P., van der Hoog, S., and Neugart, M. (2019) A heterogeneous agent macro-economic model for policy evaluation: Improving transparency and reproducibility. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 29, 467–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, H. and Neugart, M. (2011) Agent-based models for economic policy design. Eastern Economic Journal 37, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. (1991) Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica 59, 1221–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doms, M. and Dunne, T. (1998) Capital adjustment patterns in manufacturing plants. Review of Economic Dynamics 1, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., Napoletano, M., and Roventini, A. (2013) Income distribution, credit and fiscal policies in an agent-based Keynesian model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 1598–1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., and Treibich, T. (2015) Fiscal and monetary policies in complex evolving economies. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 52, 166–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., and Roventini, A. (2006) An evolutionary model of endogeneous business cycles. Computational Economics 27, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., and Roventini, A. (2010) Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 1748–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., and Treibich, T. (2016) The short-and long-run damages of fiscal austerity: Keynes beyond Schumpeter. In Stiglitz, J. E. and Guzman, M. (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Macroeconomics, pp. 79–100. Springer.Google Scholar
Dosi, G., Pereira, M. C., Roventini, A., and Virgillito, M. E. (2017) When more flexibility yields more fragility: The microfoundations of Keynesian aggregate unemployment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 81, 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Pereira, M. C., Roventini, A., and Virgillito, M. E. (in press) What if supply-side policies are not enough? The perverse interaction of flexibility and austerity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 162, 360–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J., Papageorgiou, C., and Perez-Sebastian, F. (2004) Capital-skill complementarity? Evidence from a panel of countries. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagiolo, G. and Roventini, A. (2016) Macroeconomic policy in DSGE and agent-based models redux: New developments and challenges ahead. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 20(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatti, D. D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., Russo, A., and Stiglitz, J. E. (2010) The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, 1627–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geanakoplos, J. (2010) The leverage cycle. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 24, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, H. (2007) The dynamics of general equilibrium. The Economic Journal 117, 1280–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., and Krusell, P. (1997) Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. The American Economic Review 87, 342–362.Google Scholar
Hodrick, R. J. and Prescott, E. C. (1997) Postwar us business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Hoog, S. and Dawid, H. (2017) Bubbles, crashes, and the financial cycle: The impact of banking regulation on deep recessions. Macroeconomic Dynamics 15, 1–42.Google Scholar
Imbs, J. (2007) Growth and volatility. Journal of Monetary Economics 54(7), 1848–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordà, Ò., Schularick, M., and Taylor, A. M. (2013) When credit bites back. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krusell, P., Ohanian, J.-V., Ríos-Rull, L. E., and Violante, G. L. (2000) Capital-skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68, 1029–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, B. and Tesfatsion, L. (2008) Modeling macroeconomies as open-ended systems of interacting agents. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 98, 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, N. K. (1984) The use of linear logit models in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research 11, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. and Rogers, C. A. (1997) Stabilization policy, learning-by-doing, and economic growth. Oxford Economic Papers 49, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. and Rogers, C. A. (2000) Long-term growth and short-term economic instability. European Economic Review 44, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neveu, A. R. (2013) Fiscal policy and business cycle characteristics in a heterogeneous agent macro model. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 92, 224–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piva, M. and Vivarelli, M. (2009) Corporate skills as an ex-ante incentive to R&D investment. International Journal of Manpower 30, 835–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesmeier, C. and Stähler, N. (2011) Long dark shadows or innovative spirits? The effects of (smoothing) business cycles on economic growth: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 25, 898–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2014) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Raberto, M., Telgio, A., and Cincotti, S. (2012) Debt, deleveraging and business cycles: An agent-based perspective. Economics, The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 6(2012–27).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, G. and Ramey, A. (1995) Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. The American Economic Review 85, 1138–1151.Google Scholar
Russo, A., Catalano, M., Gaffeo, E., Gallegati, M., and Napoletano, M. (2007) Industrial dynamics, fiscal policy and R&D: Evidence from a computational experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 64, 426–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Paul, G. (1997) Business cycles and long-run growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 13, 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., and Peterson, R. (1998) Inventory Management and Production Planing and Scheduling. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Sorensen, P. and Whitta-Jacobsen, H. (2005) Introducing Advanced Macroeconomics: Growth & Business Cycles. Mc Graw Hil, Maidenhead, UK.Google Scholar
Stadler, G. W. (1990) Business cycle models with endogenous technology. The American Economic Review 80, 763–778.Google Scholar
Stastny, M. and Zagler, M. (2007) Empirical evidence on growth and volatility. Working Paper 22-2007, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. (1999) Business cycles fluctuations and U.S. macroeconomic time series. In: Taylor, J. B. and Woodford, M. (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol.1, pp. 3–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S., Fürst, S., Mandel, A., Lass, W., Lincke, D., Pablo-Martí, F., and Jaeger, C. (2013) A multi-agent model of several economic regions. Environmental Modelling & Software 44, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2006) Generalized Additive Models - An Introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Harting supplementary material

Harting supplementary material
Download Harting supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 179.2 KB