Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:19:42.749Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF GUEST WORKER PERMITS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2013

Maroula Khraiche*
Affiliation:
Colorado College
*
Address correspondence to: Maroula Kraiche, Department of Economics and Business, Colorado College, 14 East Cache La Poudre Street Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA; e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

This paper evaluates the optimality of a temporary worker permit policy from the point of view of the host country by using a two-country dynamic general equilibrium model, calibrated with data from the United States and Mexico. In the model, the decision to migrate and the corresponding decision to return are endogenous and take place within families that are heterogeneous in terms of human capital. After finding a migrant's optimal migration duration and the resulting shrinkage in the wage gap and change in interest rates, the paper derives the restriction on migrants' stay that maximizes natives' utility. It also derives the migrant length of stay that would pass a majority vote. When migration duration is restricted, the fraction of the native population made better off is maximized with a permit length of four years.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, T.K. and Sinning, M. (2011) The savings behavior of temporary and permanent migrants in Germany. Journal of Population Economics 24 (2), 421449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Gad, M. (2008) Capital–skill complementarity and the immigration surplus. Review of Economic Dynamics 11 (2), 335365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, G.J. (2003) The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4), 13351374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borjas, G.J. and Katz, L.F. (2007) The evolution of the Mexican-born workforce in the United States. In Borjas, George J. (ed.), Mexican Immigration to the United States, pp. 1356. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, D. (2001) Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics 19 (1), 2264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, D. (2007) How Immigration Affects U.S. Cities. CReAM discussion paper series 0711, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), Department of Economics, University College London.Google Scholar
Chiquiar, D. and Hanson, G.H. (2005) International migration, self-selection, and the distribution of wages: Evidence from Mexico and the United States. Journal of Political Economy 113 (2), 239281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djajic, S. and Milbourne, R. (1988) A general equilibrium model of guest-worker migration: The source-country perspective. Journal of International Economics 25 (3–4), 335351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustmann, C., Bentolila, S., and Riccardo, F. (1996) Return migration: The European experience. Economic Policy 11 (22), 213250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustmann, C. (1997) Return migration, uncertainty and precautionary savings. Journal of Development Economics 52, 295316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dustmann, C. (2003) Return migration, wage differentials, and the optimal migration duration. European Economic Review 47, 353369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustmann, C. and Kirchkamp, O. (2002) The optimal migration duration and activity choice after re-migration. Journal of Development Economics 67 (2), 351372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustmann, C. and Weiss, Y. (2007) Return migration: Theory and empirical evidence from the UK. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45 (2), 236256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A.M. (2012) Immigration and large banknotes. Macroeconomic Dynamics FirstView 10, 121.Google Scholar
Galor, O. and Stark, O. (1990) Migrants' savings, the probability of return migration and migrants' performance. International Economic Review 31 (2), 463467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijdra, B.J. and Ligthart, J.E. (2006) The macroeconomic dynamics of demographic shocks. Macroeconomic Dynamics 10, 349370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., and Joines, D.H. (1998) The effect of tax-favored retirement accounts on capital accumulation. American Economic Review 88 (4), 749768.Google Scholar
Kennan, J. and Walker, J.R. (2011) The effect of expected income on individual migration decisions. Econometrica 79 (1), 211251.Google Scholar
Magris, F. and Russo, G. (2009) Frontier openness and the optimal migration duration. Research in Economics 63 (2), 114126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelman, F.S. and Zlate, A. (2012) Immigration, remittances and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 59 (2), 196213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, K. and Peri, G. (2008) Return Migration as a Channel of Brain Gain. NBER working paper 14039, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesnard, A. (2004) Temporary migration and capital market imperfections. Oxford Economic Papers 56 (2), 242262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaviano, G.I.P. and Peri, G. (2012) Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (1), 152197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendon, S. and Cuecuecha, A. (2010) International job search: Mexicans in and out of the U.S. Review of Economics of the Household 8 (1), 5382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, O., Helmenstein, C., and Prskawetz, A. (1997) A brain drain with a brain gain. Economics Letters 55, 227234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar