Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:56:05.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIQUIDITY EXTERNALITIES AND THE WALLACE CONJECTURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2019

Nicola Amendola ,
Leo Ferraris  and
Fabrizio Mattesini
Nicola Amendola
Affiliation:
Universita’ di Roma
Leo Ferraris*
Affiliation:
Universita’ di Roma
Fabrizio Mattesini
Affiliation:
Universita’ di Roma Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance
*
Address correspondence to: Leo Ferraris, Department of Economics and Finance, Universita’ di Roma, Tor Vergata, Via Columbia 2, Rome, Italy. e-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a pure currency economy with a nondegenerate distribution of money holdings in which, as conjectured by Wallace (Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, 259–274, 2014), there are transfer schemes financed by money creation that improve ex ante welfare relative to no-intervention. Differently from what was advocated by Wallace, pecuniary-like externalities, rather than the need to share liquidity risks, are responsible for the result.

Keywords

MoneyMonetary PolicyWallace Conjecture
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , September 2021 , pp. 1578 - 1588
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bajaj, A., Hu, T. W., Rocheteau, G. and Silva, M. R. (2017) Decentralizing constrained-efficient allocations in the Lagos-Wright pure currency economy. Journal of Economic Theory 167, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berentsen, A., Camera, G. and Waller, C. (2005) The distribution of money balances and the non-neutrality of money. International Economic Review 46, 465–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, T. (1980) The optimum quantity of money. In: Kareken, J. H. and Wallace, N. (eds.), Models of Monetary Economies. Minneapolis Fed.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, J., Haslag, J. and Martin, A. (2005), Heterogeneity, redistribution, and the Friedman rule. International Economic Review 46, 305–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boel, P. and Waller, C. (2019) On the theoretical efficacy of quantitative easing at the zero lower bound. International Economic Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Davila, E. and Korinek, A. (2018) Pecuniary externalities in economies with financial frictions. Review of Economic Studies 85, 352–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1969) The Optimum Quantity of Money. NYC, US: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Geanakoplos, J. and Polemarchakis, H. (1986) Existence, regularity and constrained suboptimality of competitive allocations when the asset market is incomplete. In: Heller, W. P., Starr, R. M., and Starrett, D. A. (eds.), Uncertainty, Information and Communication: Essays in Honour of K. J. Arrow. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, O. (1975) On the optimality of equilibrium when the market structure is incomplete. Journal of Economic Theory 11, 418–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, T., Levine, D. and Woodford, M. (1992) The optimum quantity of money revisited. In: Dasgupta, P., Gale, D., Hart, O. and Maskin, E. (eds.), The Economic Analysis of Markets and Games: Essays in Honor of Frank Hahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kocherlakota, N. (1998) Money is memory. Journal of Economic Theory 81, 232–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagos, R. and Wright, R. (2005) A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis. Journal of Political Economy 113, 463–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, D. (1991) Asset trading mechanisms and expansionary policy. Journal of Economic Theory 54, 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzoni, G. (2008) Inefficient credit booms. Review of Economic Studies 75, 809–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. H. (2013) Pecuniary Externality through Credit Constraints: Two Examples without Uncertainty, mimeo.Google Scholar
Shi, S. (1997) A divisible search model of Fiat money. Econometrica 65, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R. (1980) Models of money with spatially separated agents. In: Kareken, J. H. and Wallace, N. (eds.), Models of Monetary Economies. Minneapolis, MN, US: Minneapolis Fed.Google Scholar
Wallace, N. (2014) Optimal money-creation in pure-currency economies: A conjecture. Quarterly Journal of Economics 129, 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar