Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:27:04.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on magnitude bounds for the mask coefficients of the interpolatory Dubuc–Deslauriers subdivision scheme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2014

H. E. Bez
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, United Kingdom email [email protected]
N. Bez
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama 338–8570, Japan email [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyse the mask associated with the $2n$-point interpolatory Dubuc–Deslauriers subdivision scheme $S_{a^{[n]}}$. Sharp bounds are presented for the magnitude of the coefficients $a^{[n]}_{2i-1}$ of the mask. For scales $i \in [1,\sqrt{n}]$ it is shown that $|a^{[n]}_{2i-1}|$ is comparable to $i^{-1}$, and for larger power scales, exponentially decaying bounds are obtained. Using our bounds, we may precisely analyse the summability of the mask as a function of $n$ by identifying which coefficients of the mask contribute to the essential behaviour in $n$, recovering and refining the recent result of Deng–Hormann–Zhang that the operator norm of $S_{a^{[n]}}$ on $\ell ^\infty $ grows logarithmically in $n$.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2014 

References

Conti, C., Dyn, N. and Romani, L., ‘Interpolatory blending net subdivision schemes of Dubuc–Deslauriers type’, Comput. Aided Geom. Design 29 (2012) 722735.Google Scholar
Deng, C., Hormann, K. and Zhang, Z., ‘On the norms of the Dubuc–Deslauriers subdivision schemes’, Comput. Aided Geom. Design 30 (2013) 672674.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. M., Goosen, K. M. and Herbst, B. M., ‘Dubuc–Deslauriers subdivision for finite sequences and interpolation wavelets on an interval’, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35 (2003) 423452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar