No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2024
The centenary year of Lourdes has drawn the attention of the world as it was drawn in that wonderful year 1858. Some approach with an attitude of reverence, others with a faint but somewhat sceptical admiration, and there will no doubt be others who greet the celebrations with a scoffing smile of contempt. So far, however, there has been little sig of scoffing or contempt. Indeed the most striking thing that has appeared since the opening of the centenary year was, not the enthusiastic crowds of pilgrims who assisted at the ceremonies of February 11, but the dignified and respectful way in which the great journals of the secular press reported the event. They showed no fumbling or hesitation in the use of Catholic terminology nology; they spoke of ‘the Blessed Virgin’ and ‘Saint Bernadette’ without the use of inverted commas, nor was there any hint of scepticism about the visions or the miracles of Lourdes.
1 Progress in Religion, by T. R. Glover, p. 325.
2 Cf. St Bernard's warning: Virgo regiafalso non eget honore, veris cumulata honorum titulis: ‘Richly endowed with real honour, the royal Virgin needs no false honours.
3 Cf. Coi.Jur. Can. Canon 589
4 Summa III, xxvii, 2.