Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:47:00.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomic delimitation of the genera Bryoria and Sulcaria, with a new combination Sulcaria spiralifera introduced

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

Leena MYLLYS ,
Saara VELMALA ,
Hanna LINDGREN ,
Doug GLAVICH ,
Tom CARLBERG ,
Li-Song WANG  and
Trevor GOWARD
Leena MYLLYS
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: [email protected]
Saara VELMALA
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: [email protected]
Hanna LINDGREN
Affiliation:
Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: [email protected]
Doug GLAVICH
Affiliation:
Siuslaw National Forest Supervisor's Office, Corvallis Forest Science Lab, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, USA
Tom CARLBERG
Affiliation:
1959 Peninsula Drive, Arcata, CA, 95521, USA
Li-Song WANG
Affiliation:
Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Heilongtan, Kunming, Yunnan, 650204, China
Trevor GOWARD
Affiliation:
UBC Herbarium, Beaty Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bryoria pseudocapillaris and B. spiralifera are currently treated as members of Bryoria section Implexae although conspicuous, long and depressed pseudocyphellae characterizing both species resemble those found in the genus Sulcaria. Both genera belong in Parmeliaceae and form an alectorioid group together with Alectoria, Gowardia and Pseudephebe. Parsimony and Bayesian analyses of ITS, partial GAPDH and partial Mcm7 sequence data were used to examine the phylogenetic position of B. pseudocapillaris and B. spiralifera, and in light of these results evaluate the generic delimitation of Bryoria and Sulcaria. A total of 110 specimens of 53 species containing representatives from alectorioid and closely related genera were included in the analyses. The results clearly show first, that both B. pseudocapillaris and B. spiralifera belong in Sulcaria rather than in Bryoria, and second, that they should be considered conspecific. Bryoria pseudocapillaris is proposed as a synonym under B. spiralifera and the name Sulcaria spiralifera comb. nov. is introduced.

Keywords

alectorioid lichensImplexaepseudocyphellaesecondary chemistry
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 46 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 737 - 752
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awasthi, G. & Awasthi, D. D. (1985) Lichen genera Alectoria, Bryoria and Sulcaria from India and Nepal. Candollea 40: 305–320.Google Scholar
Begerow, D., Nilsson, H., Unterseher, M. & Maier, W. (2010) Current state and perspectives of fungal barcoding and rapid identification procedures. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 87: 99–108.Google Scholar
Brodo, I. M. (1986) A new species of the lichen genus Sulcaria (Ascomycotina, Alectoriaceae) from California. Mycotaxon 27: 113–117.Google Scholar
Brodo, I. M. & Alstrup, V. (1981) The lichen Bryoria subdivergens (Dahl) Brodo & D. Hawksw. in Greenland and North America. Bryologist 84: 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodo, I. M. & Hawksworth, D. L. (1977) Alectoria and allied genera in North America. Opera Botanica 42: 1–164.Google Scholar
Bystrek, J. (1971) Taxonomic studies on the genus Alectoria . Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 26: 265–279.Google Scholar
Common, R. S. & Brodo, I. M. (1995) Bryoria sect. Subdivergentes recognized as the new genus Nodobryoria (lichenized Ascomycotina). Bryologist 98: 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespo, A., Lumbsch, H. T., Mattsson, J. E., Blanco, O., Divakar, P. K., Articus, K., Wiklund, E., Bawingan, P. A. & Wedin, M. (2007) Testing morphology-based hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships in Parmeliaceae (Ascomycota) using three ribosomal markers and the nuclear RPB1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 812–824.Google Scholar
Crespo, A., Kauff, F., Divakar, P. K., del Prado, R., Pérez-Ortega, S., de Paz, G. A., Ferencova, Z., Blanco, O., Roca-Valiente, B., Núñez-Zapata, J. et al. (2010) Phylogenetic generic classification of parmelioid lichens (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) based on molecular, morphological and chemical evidence. Taxon 59: 1735–1753.Google Scholar
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012) JmodelTest2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772.Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797.Google Scholar
Glavich, D. A. (2003) The distribution, ecology and taxonomy of Bryoria spiralifera and B. pseudocapillaris on the Samoa Peninsula, Humboldt Co., coastal northern California. Bryologist 106: 588–595.Google Scholar
Glavich, D. A., Geiser, L. H. & Mikulin, A. G. (2005) The distribution of some rare coastal lichens in the Pacific Northwest, and their association with late-seral and federally-protected forests. Bryologist 108: 241–254.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704.Google Scholar
Halonen, P., Myllys, L., Velmala, S. & Hyvärinen, H. (2009) Gowardia (Parmeliaceae) – a new alectorioid lichen genus with two species. Bryologist 112: 138–146.Google Scholar
Holien, H. (1989) The genus Bryoria sect. Implexae in Norway. Lichenologist 21: 243–258.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kärnefelt, I. & Thell, A. (1992) The evaluation of characters in lichenized families, exemplified with the alectorioid and some parmelioid genera. Plant Systematics and Evolution 180: 181–204.Google Scholar
Myllys, L., Velmala, S., Holien, H., Halonen, P., Wang, L. S. & Goward, T. (2011) Phylogeny of the genus Bryoria . Lichenologist 45: 617–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, K. C. & Carpenter, J. M. (1996) On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12: 221–241.Google Scholar
Obermayer, W. & Elix, J. A. (2003) Notes on chemical races in Sulcaria sulcata from south-eastern Tibet and adjacent regions. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 86: 33–46.Google Scholar
Orange, A., James, P. W. & White, F. J. (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Peterson, E. B., Greene, D. M., McCune, B., Peterson, E. T., Hutten, M. A., Weisberg, P. & Rosentreter, R. (1998) Sulcaria badia, a rare lichen in western North America. Bryologist 101: 112–115.Google Scholar
Sadowska-Deś, A. D., Bálint, M., Otte, J. & Schmitt, I. (2013) Assessing intraspecific diversity in a lichen-forming fungus and its green algal symbiont: evaluation of eight molecular markers. Fungal Ecology 6: 141–151.Google Scholar
Schmitt, I., Crespo, A., Divakar, P. K., Fankhauser, J. D., Herman-Sackett, E., Kalb, K., Nelsen, M. P., Nelson, N. A., Rivas-Plata, E., Shimp, A. D. et al. (2009) New primers for promising single-copy genes in fungal phylogenetics and systematics. Persoonia 23: 35–40.Google Scholar
Spribille, T., Klug, B. & Mayrhofer, H. (2011 a) A phylogenetic analysis of the boreal lichen Mycoblastus sanguinarius (Mycoblastaceae, lichenized Ascomycota) reveals cryptic clades correlated with fatty acid profiles. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59: 603–614.Google Scholar
Spribille, T., Goffinet, B., Klug, B., Muggia, L., Obermayer, W. & Mayrhofer, H. (2011 b) Molecular support for the recognition of the Mycoblastus fucatus group as the new genus Violella . Lichenologist 43: 445–466.Google Scholar
Thell, A., Crespo, A., Divakar, P. K., Kärnefelt, I., Leavitt, S. D., Lumbsch, H. T. & Seaward, M. R. D. (2012) A review of the lichen family Parmeliaceae – history, phylogeny and current taxonomy. Nordic Journal of Botany 30: 641–664.Google Scholar
Velmala, S., Myllys, L., Halonen, P., Goward, T. & Ahti, T. (2009) Molecular data show that Bryoria fremontii and B. tortuosa (Parmeliaceae) are conspecific. Lichenologist 41: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velmala, S., Myllys, L., Goward, T., Holien, H. & Halonen, P. (2014) Taxonomy of Bryoria section Implexae (Parmeliaceae, Lecanorales) in North America and Europe, based on chemical, morphological and molecular data. Annales Botanici Fennici (In press).Google Scholar