Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:41:29.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The lichen genus Pseudopyrenula (Trypetheliaceae) in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2024

Komal K. Ingle Open the ORCID record for Komal K. Ingle [Opens in a new window] ,
Sanjeeva Nayaka Open the ORCID record for Sanjeeva Nayaka [Opens in a new window]  and
Dalip K. Upreti Open the ORCID record for Dalip K. Upreti [Opens in a new window]
Komal K. Ingle
Affiliation:
Lichenology Laboratory, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow-226001, U.P., India
Sanjeeva Nayaka*
Affiliation:
Lichenology Laboratory, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow-226001, U.P., India
Dalip K. Upreti
Affiliation:
Lichenology Laboratory, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow-226001, U.P., India
*
Corresponding author: Sanjeeva Nayaka; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A survey of the lichen genus Pseudopyrenula in India is presented, with morphotaxonomic accounts of all six accepted species. Two species, P. himalayana and P. megaspora, are new to science. Both species resemble P. staphyleae but have a lichenized thallus and eccentric ostiole. Furthermore, P. himalayana differs from P. staphyleae in having immersed perithecia and narrower ascospores, while P. megaspora differs in the larger ascospores. Detailed descriptions of the new species are presented, together with notes on their chemistry, distribution, ecology and taxonomy. A key to all known species of Pseudopyrenula from India is also presented.

Keywords

Asiabiodiversitylichenized fungipyrenocarpousrevisiontaxonomy
Type
Standard Paper
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 21 - 26
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Lichen Society

Introduction

The lichen genus Pseudopyrenula was established by Müller Argoviensis in 1883 for the species of Pyrenula Ach. with dispersed unilocular ascomata and colourless ascospores. Harris (Reference Harris, Glenn, Harris, Dirig and Cole1998) revised the genus Pseudopyrenula and recognized four species and one variety, reducing 18 names to synonymy with P. diluta (Fée) Müll. Arg. Harris (Reference Harris, Glenn, Harris, Dirig and Cole1998) further proposed 13 recombinations for 70 names formerly assigned to Pseudopyrenula. The genus Pseudopyrenula can be differentiated from the similar genera Bogoriella, Constrictolumina, Dictyomeridium, Novomicrothelia and Polymeridium by its unique combination of an ecorticate or indistinct thallus with hyaline, transversely septate, astrothelioid ascospores that have diamond-shaped lumina. Many species within the genus contain yellow oil in the ascospore lumina and/or the hamathecium (Aptroot & Lücking Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016). According to molecular phylogenetic analyses, the genus Pseudopyrenula belongs to the family Trypetheliaceae (Del Prado et al. Reference Del Prado, Schmitt, Kautz, Palice, Lücking and Lumbsch2006; Nelsen et al. Reference Nelsen, Lücking, Grube, Mbatchou, Muggia, Rivas Plata and Lumbsch2009, Reference Nelsen, Lücking, Mbatchou, Andrew, Spielmann and Lumbsch2011, Reference Nelsen, Lücking, Aptroot, Andrew, Cáceres, Rivas Plata, Gueidan, da Silva Canêz, Knight and Ludwig2014; Sweetwood et al. Reference Sweetwood, Lücking, Nelsen and Aptroot2012; Lücking et al. Reference Lücking, Nelsen, Aptroot, Benatti, Binh, Gueidan, Gutiérrez, Jungbluth, Lumbsch and Marcelli2016a, Reference Lücking, Nelsen, Aptroot, de Klee R, Bawingan, Benatti, Bungartz, Cáceres, Canêz and Chavesb). The genus is distributed in all tropical regions of the world and is currently represented by 24 species (Aptroot & Lücking Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016; Aptroot et al. Reference Aptroot, Sipman, Barreto, Nunes and Cáceres2019; Aptroot Reference Aptroot2021). Six species of Pseudopyrenula have been reported from India: P. diluta (Fée) Müll. Arg., P. media Aptroot & Diederich, P. pupula (Ach.) Müll. Arg., P. subgregaria Müll. Arg., P. subnudata Müll. Arg. and P. subvelata (Nyl.) Müll. Arg. (Awasthi Reference Awasthi1991; Jagadeesh Ram et al. Reference Jagadeesh Ram, Aptroot, Sinha and Singh2005; Singh & Sinha Reference Singh and Sinha2010; Aptroot & Lücking Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016; Jagadeesh Ram 2022). Of these, Pseudopyrenula pupula was transferred to Astrothelium as A. pupula (Ach.) Aptroot & Lücking, while P. subvelata was transferred to Arthopyrenia as A. subvelata (Aptroot & Lücking Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016). The aim of the present study is to update the status of the genus Pseudopyrenula in India. In the process, two new species are described and a key to all Pseudopyrenula species known so far from India is provided.

Materials and Methods

The present study is based on specimens preserved in the herbarium LWG and the consultation of protologues. A Leica S8APO stereozoom microscope was used to study the external morphology of the specimens, while anatomical characters of ascomata were observed under a Leica DM500 compound microscope. Thin, hand-cut sections of the ascomata were initially mounted in water to record the colour and measurements of various structures. The sections were then observed after applying aqueous KOH and Lugol's solution (CDH, New Delhi) was used for iodine reactions. Colour tests were performed using routine reagents; aqueous KOH (10%; K), calcium hypochlorite (C) and para-phenylene-diamine (Pd). TLC was performed in solvent system C following Orange et al. (Reference Orange, James and White2001).

Taxonomy

Pseudopyrenula diluta (Fée) Müll. Arg.

Flora, Regensburg 66(16), 249 (1883).

The following description is based on observations made by Aptroot & Lücking (Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016). The original specimen has not been examined.

Thallus ecorticate, white, smooth to uneven lacking chemical substances.

Ascomata solitary, 0.3–0.5 mm, prominent, hemispherical, exposed and black with apical ostioles; hamathecium inspersed with hyaline oil droplets; asci 8-spored; ascospores hyaline often partly with yellow oil in the lumina, 3-septate, fusiform-ellipsoid, IKI−, not ornamented, 24–32 × 7–10 μm.

Chemistry

Thallus UV−, K−. TLC: no secondary substances detected.

Distribution

The species is reported from Arunachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand and the West Bengal plains (Singh & Sinha Reference Singh and Sinha2010).

Discussion

Pseudopyrenula diluta shows a close resemblance to P. subnudata in its exposed, black ascomata and inspersed hamathecium but differs in having longer ascospores. Harris (Reference Harris, Glenn, Harris, Dirig and Cole1998) previously treated P. diluta and P. subnudata as varieties but subsequently both taxa were accepted as distinct species by Aptroot & Lücking (Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016).

Pseudopyrenula himalayana Ingle, Nayaka & Upreti sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB 850274

Differs from Pseudopyrenula staphyleae by a lichenized thallus, immersed perithecia, eccentric ostiole and narrower ascospores measuring 40–53 × 9–11 μm.

Type: India, Himachal Pradesh, Hamirpur district, Jean nala, 500 m, on bark of Phoenix sylvestris, 6 April 2003, D. K. Upreti et al. 03-001471 (LWG—holotype).

(Fig. 1A–F)

Figure 1. Pseudopyrenula himalayana (holotype) A, thallus. B, transverse section of perithecium. C, transverse section of thallus. D, detail of perithecium. E & F, ascospores. Note: C, D, E & F treated with lactophenol cotton blue. Scales: A = 5 mm; B = 0.2 mm; C = 200 μm; D = 100 μm; E & F = 25 μm. In colour online.

Thallus corticolous, crustose, greyish white, smooth, ecorticate, up to 5 cm, UV−; photobiont Trentepohlia.

Ascomata perithecia, immersed, solitary, conical, 0.2–0.5 mm diam. Ostiole eccentric, immersed. Involucrellum entire, carbonized, 30–52 μm thick. Hamathecium hyaline, not inspersed with oil droplets, pseudoparaphyses branched and anastomosing. Asci clavate, 8-spored, mostly uniseriate, 135–220 × 18–23 μm. Ascospores transversely 3-septate, colourless, fusiform, with angular, diamond-shaped lumina, 40–53 × 9–11 μm.

Chemistry

Thallus UV−, K−. TLC: no secondary substances detected.

Etymology

The species epithet refers to the type locality within the Himalayan region.

Distribution and ecology

Currently the new species is known only from its type locality, Himachal Pradesh in the foothills of Western Himalaya. It was found on the bark of Phoenix sylvestris in deciduous forest with a subtropical climate at an elevation of 500 m.

Notes

The new taxon is characterized by its greyish white, smooth, ecorticate thallus, immersed ascomata with eccentric ostioles, a clear hamathecium and large ascospores (40–53 × 9–11 μm). The thallus is mostly smooth, but occasionally forms granular patches. Pseudopyrenula himalayana closely resembles P. staphyleae (Petr.) Aptroot in having a clear hamathecium and similar ascospore length but P. staphyleae has a non-lichenized thallus, apical ostioles and wider ascospores (12–15 μm) (Table 1). Pseudopyrenula himalayana is also close to the other new species, P. megaspora Ingle, Nayaka & Upreti, in having eccentric ostioles and a clear hamathecium but P. megaspora has a non-carbonized involucrellum and longer ascospores (40–60 μm).

Table 1. Comparison of two new species of Pseudopyrenula with similar species.

Pseudopyrenula media Aptroot & Diederich

Herzogia 30(1), 213 (2017).

The following description is based on observations made by Jagadeesh Ram (2022). The original specimen has not been examined.

Thallus ecorticate, white, suborbicular to irregular, smooth, with an anthraquinone as a chemical substance.

Ascomata solitary, sometimes confluent, subglobose to hemispherical, black with apical ostioles; hamathecium inspersed with yellow oil droplets; asci 8-spored; ascospores 3-septate, oblong-fusiform, IKI−, not ornamented, 25–30 × 7.5–10 μm.

Chemistry

Thallus UV−, K−, hamathecium K+ deep yellow to reddish. TLC: anthraquinone.

Distribution

In India, P. media is reported only from the Andaman Islands (Jagadeesh Ram 2022).

Discussion

Pseudopyrenula media is similar to P. subgregaria in its yellow hamathecium inspersion. However, the latter differs in having smaller ascospores (18–22 × 5–7 μm) (Jagadeesh Ram 2022).

Pseudopyrenula megaspora Ingle, Nayaka & Upreti sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB 850275

Differs from Pseudopyrenula staphyleae by a lichenized thallus, eccentric ostiole and longer and narrower ascospores, measuring 40–60 × 9–11 μm.

Type: India, Uttar Pradesh, Sonbhadra district, Hathinala, 284 m, on bark of tree, 23 June 2008, Santosh Joshi 08-015764/B (LWG—holotype).

(Fig. 2A–H)

Figure 2. Pseudopyrenula megaspora. (holotype) A, thallus. B, perithecium. C, transverse section of thallus. D, transverse section of perithecium. E, ascus. F–H, ascospores. Note: C, D, E & G treated with lactophenol cotton blue. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 0.5 mm; C = 200 μm; D = 100 μm; E & H = 50 μm; F & G = 25 μm. In colour online.

Thallus corticolous, crustose, smooth to uneven, visible as pale green discoloration of the bark, up to 7 cm, ecorticate, UV−. Photobiont Trentepohlia, sparse.

Ascomata perithecia, immersed, solitary, subglobose, 0.2–0.6 mm diam. Ostiole eccentric, immersed to erumpent. Involucrellum entire, not carbonized. Hamathecium hyaline, not inspersed with oil droplets, pseudoparaphyses branched and anastomosing. Asci cylindrical, 8-spored, mostly uniseriate, 170–235 × 16–18 μm. Ascospores transversely 3-septate, colourless, fusiform, with angular, diamond-shaped lumina, 40–60 × 9–11 μm.

Chemistry

Thallus UV−, K−. TLC: no secondary substances detected.

Etymology

The epithet refers to the large ascospores of the species.

Distribution and ecology

The new species is currently known only from the type locality in the Gangetic plains of Uttar Pradesh. It was growing on the bark of a tree in deciduous forest at an elevation of 284 m.

Notes

Pseudopyrenula megaspora is characterized by its ecorticate, pale greenish thallus, eccentric, ascomata with immersed to erumpent ostioles, clear hamathecium and large ascospores (40–60 × 9–11 μm). The species has the largest ascospores of all Pseudopyrenula species. Another species, P. staphyleae, shows a close resemblance to the new species in having a similar thallus coloration and a clear hamathecium, but it differs in having a non-lichenized thallus, apical ostioles and wider ascospores (45–55 × 12–15 μm). The other two species of Pseudopyrenula with eccentric ostioles are P. himalayana and P. cubana (Müll. Arg.) Aptroot & Lücking (Table 1). However, P. himalayana differs in having a carbonized involucrellum and slightly shorter ascospores (40–53 μm), and P. cubana differs in having erumpent ostioles, an inspersed hamathecium and smaller ascospores (21–25 × 6–9 μm).

Pseudopyrenula subgregaria Müll. Arg.

Bot. Jb. 6, 408 (1885).

The following description is based on observations made by Jagadeesh Ram (2022). The original specimen has not been examined.

Thallus ecorticate, white, smooth to uneven, with an anthraquinone as a chemical substance.

Ascomata solitary, 0.3–0.4 mm diam., prominent, hemispherical, exposed and black, with apical ostioles; hamathecium inspersed, with yellow oil droplets; asci 8-spored; ascospores hyaline, 3-septate, fusiform-ellipsoid, IKI−, not ornamented, 18–22 × 5–7 μm.

Chemistry

Thallus UV−, K−, hamathecium K+ deep yellow to reddish. TLC: anthraquinone.

Distribution

This species is reported from West Bengal and the Andaman Islands (Jagadeesh Ram 2022).

Discussion

The species shows a close resemblance to Pseudopyrenula subnudata in having an ecorticate thallus and ascospores of a similar size, but P. subnudata differs in having an inspersed hamathecium with hyaline oil droplets (Aptroot & Lucking Reference Aptroot and Lücking2016).

Pseudopyrenula subnudata Müll. Arg.

Flora, Regensburg 66(16), 249, 272 (1883).

The following description is based on observations made by Jagadeesh Ram et al. (Reference Jagadeesh Ram, Aptroot, Sinha and Singh2005). The original specimen has not been examined.

Thallus ecorticate, white, smooth to uneven, with no chemical substance.

Ascomata solitary, 0.2–0.4 mm diam., prominent, hemispherical, exposed and black with apical ostioles; hamathecium hyaline, inspersed with hyaline oil droplets; asci 8-spored; ascospores hyaline, sometimes yellow oil in the lumina, 3-septate, fusiform-ellipsoid, IKI−, not ornamented, 21–25 × 6–9 μm.

Chemistry

Thallus UV−, K−. TLC: no secondary substances detected.

Distribution

This species is reported from Arunachal Pradesh, West Bengal and Odisha (Singh & Sinha Reference Singh and Sinha2010; Singh et al. Reference Singh, Singh and Bhatt2015; Nayak et al. Reference Nayak, Bajpai, Upreti and Satapathy2016).

Discussion

Pseudopyrenula diluta and P. subgregaria resemble P. subnudata morphologically and anatomically, but P. diluta differs in having longer ascospores (24–32 μm), and P. subgregaria contains anthraquinones and has a yellow hamathecium inspersion.

Key to the species of Pseudopyrenula in India

  1. 1 Ostiole eccentric………2

    Ostiole apical………3

  2. 2(1) Involucrellum carbonized, ascospores 40–53 × 9–11 μm………P. himalayana

    Involucrellum non-carbonized, ascospores 40–60 × 9–11 μm………P. megaspora

  3. 3(1) Hamathecium inspersed with hyaline oil droplets………4

    Hamathecium inspersed with yellow oil droplets………5

  4. 4(3) Ascospores 21–25 × 6–9 μm………P. subnudata

    Ascospores 24–32 × 7–10 μm………P. diluta

  5. 5(3) Ascospores 25–30 × 7.5–10 μm………P. media

    Ascospores 18–22 × 5–7 μm………P. subgregaria

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Director, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow for providing essential laboratory facilities and financial assistance under in-house project OLP-0101. The authors also thank researchers for submitting their samples to the LWG Herbarium of CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow (CSIR-NBRI manuscript number – CSIR-NBRI_MS/2023/04/13).

Author ORCIDs

Komal K. Ingle, 0000-0002-0659-6031; Sanjeeva Nayaka, 0000-0001-6541-2362; Dalip K. Upreti, 0000-0002-5513-1759.

Competing Interests

All authors have expressed their willingness to be an author of this article and have declared no conflict of interest.

References

Aptroot, A (1998) A world revision of Massarina (Ascomycota). Nova Hedwigia 66, 89–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aptroot, A (2021) World key to the species of Pyrenulaceae and Trypetheliaceae. Separatum from F. Schumm & A. Aptroot, Atlas of Pyrenulaceae and Trypetheliaceae, Volume 1, ISBN 978-3-7543-9685-8. Archive for Lichenology 29, 1–91.Google Scholar
Aptroot, A and Lücking, R (2016) A revisionary synopsis of the Trypetheliaceae (Ascomycota: Trypetheliales). Lichenologist 48, 763–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aptroot, A, Sipman, HJM, Barreto, FMO, Nunes, AD and Cáceres, MES (2019) Ten new species and 34 new country records of Trypetheliaceae. Lichenologist 51, 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awasthi, DD (1991) A key to the microlichens of India, Nepal and Sri Lanka. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 40, 1–340.Google Scholar
Del Prado, R, Schmitt, I, Kautz, S, Palice, Z, Lücking, R and Lumbsch, HT (2006) Molecular data place Trypetheliaceae in Dothideomycetes. Mycological Research 110, 511–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, RC (1998) A preliminary revision of Pseudopyrenula Müll. Arg. (lichenized Ascomycetes, Trypetheliaceae) with a redisposition of the names previously assigned to the genus. In Glenn, MG, Harris, RC, Dirig, R and Cole, MS (eds), Lichenographina Thomsoniana. Ithaca: Mycotaxon, pp. 133–148.Google Scholar
Jagadeesh Ram TAM (2022) Additional records of Pyrenocarpous lichens from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Cryptogam Biodiversity and Assessment 6, 27–33.Google Scholar
Jagadeesh Ram, TAM, Aptroot, A, Sinha, GP and Singh, KP (2005) New species and new records of lichenized and non-lichenized pyrenocarpous ascomycetes from the Sundarbans Biosphere Reserve, India. Mycotaxon 91, 455–459.Google Scholar
Lücking, R, Nelsen, MP, Aptroot, A, Benatti, MN, Binh, NQ, Gueidan, C, Gutiérrez, MC, Jungbluth, P, Lumbsch, HT, Marcelli, MP, et al. (2016 a) A pot-pourri of new species of Trypetheliaceae resulting from molecular phylogenetic studies. Lichenologist 48, 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lücking, R, Nelsen, MP, Aptroot, A, de Klee R, Barillas, Bawingan, PA, Benatti, MN, Bungartz, F, Cáceres, MES, Canêz, LS, Chaves, JL, et al. (2016 b) A phylogenetic framework for reassessing generic concepts and species delimitation in the lichenized family Trypetheliaceae (Ascomycota: Dothideomycetes). Lichenologist 48, 739–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, SK, Bajpai, R, Upreti, DK and Satapathy, KB (2016) Diversity of lichen flora of Odisha, India – a review. Studies in Fungi 1, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, MP, Lücking, R, Grube, M, Mbatchou, JS, Muggia, L, Rivas Plata, E and Lumbsch, HT (2009) Unravelling the phylogenetic relationships of lichenised fungi in Dothideomyceta. Studies in Mycology 64, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelsen, MP, Lücking, R, Mbatchou, JS, Andrew, CJ, Spielmann, AA and Lumbsch, HT (2011) New insights into relationships of lichen-forming Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 51, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, MP, Lücking, R, Aptroot, A, Andrew, CJ, Cáceres, MES, Rivas Plata, E, Gueidan, C, da Silva Canêz, L, Knight, A, Ludwig, LR, et al. (2014) Elucidating phylogenetic relationships and genus-level classification within the fungal family Trypetheliaceae (Ascomycota: Dothideomycetes). Taxon 63, 974–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orange, A, James, PW and White, FJ (2001) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Singh, KP and Sinha, GP (2010) Indian Lichens: An Annotated Checklist. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.Google Scholar
Singh, P, Singh, KP and Bhatt, AB (2015) Diversity and distribution of microlichens in the state of Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalaya, India. Check List 11, 1807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetwood, G, Lücking, R, Nelsen, MP and Aptroot, A (2012) Ascospore ontogeny and discharge in megalosporous Trypetheliaceae and Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Dothideomycetes and Lecanoromycetes) suggest phylogenetic relationships and ecological constraints. Lichenologist 44, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Pseudopyrenula himalayana (holotype) A, thallus. B, transverse section of perithecium. C, transverse section of thallus. D, detail of perithecium. E & F, ascospores. Note: C, D, E & F treated with lactophenol cotton blue. Scales: A = 5 mm; B = 0.2 mm; C = 200 μm; D = 100 μm; E & F = 25 μm. In colour online.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison of two new species of Pseudopyrenula with similar species.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Pseudopyrenula megaspora. (holotype) A, thallus. B, perithecium. C, transverse section of thallus. D, transverse section of perithecium. E, ascus. F–H, ascospores. Note: C, D, E & G treated with lactophenol cotton blue. Scales: A = 1 mm; B = 0.5 mm; C = 200 μm; D = 100 μm; E & H = 50 μm; F & G = 25 μm. In colour online.