Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-25T14:00:16.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diploicia edulis (Caliciaceae) and Physcia ornamentalis (Physciaceae), two new species associated with invertebrates from the tropical dry forest of Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2025

Ricardo Miranda-González*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Liquenología Tropical, Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México, México
Felipe Campos-Cerda
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Biology Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97405, USA Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México, México
María de los Angeles Herrera-Campos
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Líquenes, Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, C.P. 04510, Ciudad de México, México
*
Corresponding author: Ricardo Miranda-González; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Two new species in the genera Diploicia and Physcia are described from the tropical dry forest of Mexico. Both species are supported by morphological, chemical and molecular evidence. Diploicia edulis, a species heavily consumed by invertebrates, is characterized by lecanorine apothecia, a dull brown epihymenium not diffused by a green pigment (K−), a subhymenium conspicuously inspersed with oil droplets, and the diploicin chemosyndrome. We provide the first molecular evidence to support the inclusion of species with lecanorine apothecia in the genus Diploicia. Physcia ornamentalis, previously reported under the name Physcia undulata s. lat. as one of the main construction materials for the bags of a moth caterpillar species (Psychidae), is characterized by a frosted-pruinose thallus, soralia originating in the lobe sinuses, and by lacking soralia in the thalline margin of the apothecia.

Type
Standard Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The British Lichen Society

Introduction

Interactions between lichens and animals are widespread. In tropical ecosystems, whether those interactions are related to food, shelter, or camouflage, they typically occur with invertebrates (Gerson & Seaward Reference Gerson, Seaward and Seaward1977). In the case of neotropical dry forests, lichen communities are dominated by crustose forms in terms of abundance and species richness (Miranda-González & McCune Reference Miranda-González and McCune2020), with several new species described in recent years (Herrera-Campos et al. Reference Herrera-Campos, Barcenas-Peña, Miranda-González, Altamirano Mejía, Bautista González, Martínez Colín, Sánchez Téllez and Lücking2019; Guzmán-Guillermo et al. Reference Guzmán-Guillermo, Sorcia-Navarrete, Llarena-Hernandez and Cárdenas-Mendoza2021; Miranda-González et al. Reference Miranda-González, Bungartz, Lücking, Gaya, Mendonça, Viñas-Portilla, Cáceres and Herrera-Campos2022a; Soto-Medina Reference Soto-Medina2022). However, the use of lichens by invertebrates, beyond their use as food, typically favours the tridimensionality of foliose and fruticose forms (Miranda-González et al. Reference Miranda-González, McCune and Moldenke2023).

Although less abundant than crustose forms, macrolichens are also diverse in tropical forests (Aptroot & Cáceres Reference Aptroot and Cáceres2014), with new species being described continuously (Miranda-González et al. Reference Miranda-González, Epitacio-Joaquin, Tehler, Sánchez, éllez and Herrera-Campos2022b). Given the widespread use of European names for American taxa and the availability of molecular techniques, many new species of tropical macrolichens are likely to be reported in the coming years (Esslinger et al. Reference Esslinger, Leavitt and McCune2020). Here, we describe two new species of (sub)foliose lichens associated with invertebrates from the tropical dry forest of Mexico. Diploicia edulis sp. nov. was found heavily covered by silk and faecal pellets, since invertebrates use it for shelter and food. Physcia ornamentalis sp. nov., referred to as Physcia undulata s. lat. in Miranda-González et al. (Reference Miranda-González, McCune and Moldenke2023), is one of the primary materials Psychidae caterpillars use in their bag construction.

The genus Diploicia A. Massal. (Caliciaceae), with only nine species accepted so far (including the new species described here), is characterized by a placodioid thallus and the diploicin chemosyndrome. Based on these characteristics, a recent amendment of the genus by Bungartz et al. (Reference Bungartz, Elix, Kalb and Giralt2016) included species with either lecideine or lecanorine apothecia. The genus Physcia (Schreb.) Michx. (Physciaceae), with c. 75 accepted species, is characterized by a foliose thallus, a paraplectenchymatous upper cortex, and atranorin as the cortical substance (Moberg Reference Moberg1990; Elix Reference Elix2011).

Materials and Methods

Study area

Specimens were collected from the tropical dry forest of the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, located 2 km inland from the Pacific Coast of Mexico (20°N, 105°W). The reserve contains abundant and diverse lichen communities dominated by the families Arthoniaceae, Graphidaceae and Pyrenulaceae (Herrera-Campos et al. Reference Herrera-Campos, Barcenas-Peña, Miranda-González, Altamirano Mejía, Bautista González, Martínez Colín, Sánchez Téllez and Lücking2019; Miranda-González & McCune Reference Miranda-González and McCune2020). Detailed descriptions of the study area are found elsewhere (Noguera et al. Reference Noguera, Vega Rivera, García Aldrete and Quesada2002; Maass et al. Reference Maass, Ahedo-Hernández, Araiza, Verduzco, Martínez-Yrízar, JaramilloVJ, Pascual, García-Méndez and Sarukhán2018).

Anatomical studies

Specimens were studied using standard techniques with a Zeiss Stemi DV4 dissecting microscope and a Euromex iScope compound microscope connected to an AmScope MU1803 digital camera. Thallus images were taken with a Nikon D5300 digital camera and a Leica Z16 APOA dissecting microscope connected to a Leica DFC490 camera using the software Leica Application Suite v. 4.3.0. Sections and all anatomical measurements were made on material mounted in tap water. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed in solvents A and C using the standard techniques outlined in Elix (Reference Elix2014) and McCune (Reference McCune2017). Diploicia canescens (Dicks.) A. Massal. was used as a control for the identification of secondary metabolites.

Taxon sampling for molecular analyses

We performed two sets of phylogenetic analyses, one for Diploicia and one for Physcia. For the Diploicia analyses, taxon sampling included all available sequences in GenBank of Diploicia, selected sequences of the closely related Diplotomma Flot., and selected sequences of Pyxine Fr. which was used as outgroup following Helms et al. (Reference Helms, Friedl and Rambold2003), Prieto & Wedin (Reference Prieto and Wedin2017) and Ai et al. (Reference Ai, Zhong, Scheidegger, Wang and Wang2022). Datasets were selected using data from Grube & Arup (Reference Grube and Arup2001), Bhattacharya et al. (Reference Bhattacharya, Friedl and Helms2002), Molina et al. (Reference Molina, Crespo, Blanco, Hladun and Hawksworth2002), Nadyeina et al. (Reference Nadyeina, Grube and Mayrhofer2010), Prieto & Wedin (Reference Prieto and Wedin2017), Yang et al. (Reference Yang, Wang, Liu, Zhang, Li, Yin, Scheidegger and Wang2018), Moya et al. (Reference Moya, Molins, Chiva, Bastida and Barreno2020), Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Li, Liu, Zhang, Yin, Zhong, Wang and Wang2020) and Ai et al. (Reference Ai, Zhong, Scheidegger, Wang and Wang2022), together with new sequences generated in this study (Supplementary Material Table S1, available online). A second analysis for Diploicia (Supplementary Material Fig. S1, available online) included all available ITS sequences of Diplotomma and was carried out to ensure the separation of the genera Diploicia and Diplotomma. For the Physcia analyses, we selected a monophyletic clade from Esslinger et al. (Reference Esslinger, Leavitt and McCune2020) that contained our new species, along with the sister clade containing Physcia jackii Moberg as outgroup; from there, we undertook taxon sampling and chose datasets from Helms et al. (Reference Helms, Friedl and Rambold2003), Elix et al. (Reference Elix, Corush and Lumbsch2009), Orock et al. (Reference Orock, Leavitt, Fonge, St Clair and Lumbsch2012), Ohmura et al. (Reference Ohmura, Sugimoto, Aung and Tanaka2020), Rangsiruji et al. (Reference Rangsiruji, Meesim, Buaruang, Boonpragob, Mongkolsuk, Binchai, Pringsulaka and Parnmen2020), Miranda-González et al. (Reference Miranda-González, McCune and Moldenke2023), and the new sequences generated in this study (Supplementary Material Table S1).

DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing

For each sample, a piece of thallus c. 2 mm diam. was detached and washed in acetone for 5 min at 70 °C, followed by two more acetone washes at room temperature. Genomic DNA was isolated using the Sigma-Aldrich REDExtract-N-Amp Plant PCR Kit following the manufacturer's instructions, except only 15 μl of extraction buffer and 15 μl of dilution buffer were used per sample. The whole ITS and portions of mtSSU and nuLSU were amplified and sequenced using the following primers: ITS1F/ITS4 (White et al. Reference White, Bruns, Lee, Taylor, Innis, Gelfand, Sninsky and White1990; Gardes & Bruns Reference Gardes and Bruns1993), mrSSU1/mrSSU3R (Zoller et al. Reference Zoller, Scheidegger and Sperisen1999), and AL2R/LR6 (Vilgalys & Hester Reference Vilgalys and Hester1990; Mangold et al. Reference Mangold, Martín, Lücking and Lumbsch2008).

Amplifications were performed with 10 μl PCR reactions consisting of 5 μl R4775 Sigma-Aldrich REDExtract-N-Amp PCR Ready Mix, 0.5 μl of each primer (10 μM), 3 μl water, and 1 μl diluted DNA template. The PCR cycling conditions for ITS were as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 105 s, followed by 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR cycling conditions for mtSSU and nuLSU were: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 53 °C (for mtSSU) or 57 °C (for nuLSU) for 1 min, and 72 °C for 105 s, followed by 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products (2 μl per sample) were visualized on 1.5% TBA agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium, San Francisco, CA, USA). PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) before Sanger sequencing.

Molecular work, including sequencing, was carried out at the Laboratorio de Biología Molecular, as part of the Laboratorio Nacional de Biodiversidad, in the Instituto de Biología of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Phylogenetic analysis

New sequences were edited in Geneious R11 (Kearse et al. Reference Kearse, Moir, Wilson, Stones-Havas, Cheung, Sturrock, Buxton, Cooper, Markowitz and Duran2012). All sequences from each genetic marker were aligned independently with MAFFT (Katoh & Standley Reference Katoh and Standley2013) and manually corrected. For the genus Diploicia, we included the genetic markers ITS and mtSSU in the phylogenetic analyses. For the genus Physcia, we included only ITS because the genetic markers mtSSU and nuLSU are not well represented in GenBank; however, all three genetic markers were obtained from the holotype. The final concatenated alignments are available as Supplementary Material Files S1 and S2 (available online). The maximum likelihood (ML) analyses of all markers, partitioned by marker, were performed using RAxML v. 8.2.11 (Stamatakis Reference Stamatakis2014), with 550 bootstrapping replicates. The Bayesian analyses were performed using MrBayes v. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. Reference Ronquist, Teslenko, van der Mark, Ayres, Darling, Höhna, Larget, Liu, Suchard and Huelsenbeck2012), with one million generations and default settings. All analyses were performed with the GTR GAMMA I model and run on Geneious R11. The final ML trees were plotted in Geneious R11 and edited in Photoshop.

Results and Discussion

Phylogenetic analyses

This study generated a total of 10 sequences (Table 1). The dataset for the Diploicia analyses consisted of 1378 unambiguously aligned characters, 540 from ITS and 838 from mtSSU, of which 275 and 202, respectively, were phylogenetically informative. The dataset for the Physcia analyses consisted of 530 unambiguously aligned characters, of which 197 were phylogenetically informative.

Table 1. GenBank Accession numbers of new sequences generated in this study. – indicates missing data. * indicates holotypes. All samples are from Mexico (all specimens are deposited in MEXU).

As previously shown by Molina et al. (Reference Molina, Crespo, Blanco, Hladun and Hawksworth2002), our phylogenetic analyses for Diploicia (Fig. 1) resolved the genus as monophyletic. However, contrary to Molina et al. (Reference Molina, Crespo, Blanco, Hladun and Hawksworth2002) and in agreement with subsequent studies, we believe that Diploicia should not be synonymized with Diplotomma, but rather be considered as its sister group. This conclusion is supported by their different growth form which is correlated with a clear separation in the phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Material Fig. S1, available online). The new species Diploicia edulis, described below, provides the first molecular evidence to include species with lecanorine apothecia in the genus, an amendment proposed by Bungartz et al. (Reference Bungartz, Elix, Kalb and Giralt2016) based on morphological and chemical evidence, that also occurs in the closely related genus Pyxine. Molina et al. (Reference Molina, Crespo, Blanco, Hladun and Hawksworth2002) suggested that the sorediate species Diploicia canescens and the fertile species D. subcanescens (Werner) Hafellner & Poelt should be synonymized; however, as shown in many other lichen groups, our phylogenetic results suggest that the widely distributed D. canescens is a species complex that needs further revision. Similarly, sequenced species of Diplotomma show further work is required in many cases to define monophyletic species (Supplementary Material Fig. S1).

Figure 1. Phylogeny of the genus Diploicia based on a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of the genetic markers nuITS and mtSSU. Support values are shown as numbers if ML bootstrap values are ≥ 70 and as bold branches if Bayesian posterior probabilities are ≥ 0.95. Bold names show new sequences from this study and * indicates sequences from the type collection. The name of each terminal branch includes GenBank numbers of nuITS/mtSSU with – indicating missing data.

Our phylogenetic analyses for Physcia resolved the new species Physcia ornamentalis, described below, and the morphologically similar P. undulata Moberg in related but different clades (Fig. 2). Instead, P. ornamentalis was resolved next to a clade of Australian species that differ morphologically by the patterns of soralia present.

Figure 2. Phylogeny of selected Physcia species based on a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of the genetic marker nuITS. Support values are shown as numbers if ML bootstrap values are ≥ 70 and as bold branches if Bayesian posterior probabilities are ≥ 0.95. Bold names show new sequences from this study and * indicates sequences from the type collection. The name of each terminal branch includes GenBank numbers of nuITS.

Taxonomy

Diploicia edulis R. Miranda, Campos-Cerda & Herrera-Camp. sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB 855034

Similar to Diploicia endopyxinea (Müll. Arg.) Kalb et al. but differs by having a subhymenium conspicuously inspersed with oil droplets, a greyish thallus surface, epruinose apothecia, and a neotropical distribution (Mexico).

Type: Mexico, Jalisco, La Huerta Mun., Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Estación de Biología Chamela, on Chachalacas trail, tropical dry forest, 19°29ʹ49ʺN, 105°2ʹ35ʺW, alt. 90 m, on a canopy branch of a fallen tree, August 2015, R. Miranda-González 6011 (MEXUholotype). GenBank Accession nos.: PQ137213 (nuITS), PQ137209 (mtSSU).

(Fig. 3)

Figure 3. Diploicia edulis. A–C & E, habit showing placodioid thalli, lecanorine apothecia and abundant pycnidia. D, Dirinaria-type ascospores. F, subhymenium treated with KOH and showing abundant oil droplets (arrow). G, section of a mature apothecium. A, B, D, F & G, R. Miranda-González 6011 (holotype, MEXU). C, R. Miranda-González 5208 (MEXU). E, R. Miranda-González 6012 (MEXU). Scales: A–C & E = 1 mm; D = 5 μm; F = 20 μm; G = 100 μm. In colour online.

Thallus corticolous, subfoliose, placodioid, orbicular or irregularly spreading, tightly adnate to the substratum, up to 4 cm wide. Lobes up to 1 mm wide, convex to slightly plane, branching irregular to anisotomic, mostly contiguous, sometimes imbricate and rarely discrete at the apices, margin entire, apices truncate to rounded. Central areoles continuous, convex to bullate, abundantly covered by pycnidia and apothecia. Upper surface whitish grey, dull, pruina sometimes present in small amounts at the lobe apices. Soralia absent. Upper cortex paraplectenchymatous. Medulla white throughout.

Apothecia common, clearly lecanorine with lecideine stage in young apothecia not observed, up to 1.2 mm wide, sessile, flat; disc black, epruinose, lower than the thalline margin; thalline margin frequently crenulate, same colour as the thallus, with cortex, photobiont layer, and medulla; proper exciple reduced and hyaline in mature apothecia, light brown towards the hypothecium; epihymenium dull brown, not diffused by a green pigment (K−); hymenium hyaline, not inspersed; subhymenium hyaline to light brown at the edge of the hypothecium, conspicuously inspersed with oil droplets; hypothecium light brown, extending further than the proper exciple into a short stipe. Asci clavate, 8-spored. Ascospores 1-septate, grey-brown to darker brown when old, smooth, narrowly ellipsoid, with slightly pointed ends, with distinct apical thickenings of a lighter colour; cell lumina initially angular but soon thin-walled (Dirinaria-type), 10–14 × 4–6 μm (n = 21).

Pycnidia abundant, immersed, flask-shaped. Conidia hyaline, simple, bacilliform, not tapered at ends, 4–6 × 0.7–1.2 μm (n = 15).

Chemistry

TLC shows atranorin, diploicin and an accessory substance related to diploicin. Spot test: K+ yellow and P+ yellow on cortex, all other reactions negative.

Etymology

The epithet edulis (‘edible’ in Latin) has been chosen to emphasize that specimens of the new species frequently appear damaged, showing feeding traces as a result of invertebrate herbivory.

Ecology and distribution

The new species is so far known only for the tropical dry forest of the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, Mexico. It is a rare species associated with canopy branches. All known specimens show signs of invertebrate consumption.

Remarks

The new species resembles Diploicia endopyxinea, an endemic to Socotra, Yemen, that differs by its pale white surface, apothecia with weakly pruinose discs, and subhymenium without oil droplets. Diploicia glebosa (Tuck.) Bungartz et al. and D. neotropica Kalb et al., two saxicolous species endemic to the Galapagos Islands, differ by their olivaceous epihymenium that reacts K+ faintly violet and by their larger ascospores (Bungartz et al. Reference Bungartz, Elix, Kalb and Giralt2016). All other species in the genus have lecideine apothecia. Diploicia edulis will key out in couplet 5 of Bungartz et al. (Reference Bungartz, Elix, Kalb and Giralt2016) as: ‘Epihymenium pale to dull brown, without a diffuse green pigment (K−); apothecia with black epruinose discs, subhymenium with oil droplets; known only from the Pacific coast of Mexico.’

Additional specimens examined (paratypes)

Mexico: Jalisco: La Huerta Mun., Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Estación de Biología Chamela, on Chachalacas trail, tropical dry forest, alt. 90 m, on a canopy branch of a fallen tree, 2015, R. Miranda-González 5208 (MEXU), 6012 (MEXU).

Physcia ornamentalis R. Miranda, Campos-Cerda & Herrera-Camp. sp. nov.

MycoBank No.: MB 855035

Similar to Physcia undulata but differs by having soralia originating from the lobe sinuses and by lacking soralia in the thalline margin of the apothecia.

Type: Mexico, Jalisco, La Huerta Mun., Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Estación de Biología Chamela, on Tejón trail, 1080 m, tropical dry forest, 19°30ʹ30ʺN, 105°2ʹ55ʺW, alt. 50 m, on a canopy branch of a fallen tree, December 2015, R. Miranda-González 5029 (MEXUholotype). GenBank Accession nos.: PQ137214 (nuITS), PQ137210 (mtSSU), PQ137218 (nuLSU).

(Fig. 4)

Figure 4. Physcia ornamentalis. A & B, habit showing thallus with abundant pruina, apothecia and soralia. C, in situ use of P. ornamentalis (arrow) for bag construction by a Psychidae caterpillar. D, young thallus growing on a piece of flagging showing soralia originating from the lobe sinuses (arrow). E, ascospores showing an intermediate form between Physcia and Pachysporaria-type. F, lower surface uniformly white. G, old thallus showing abundant apothecia and lacking soralia. A, B, E & F, R. Miranda-González 5029 (holotype, MEXU). C, R. Miranda-González 18-2 (MEXU). D, F. Campos-Cerda s. n. (MEXU); G, M. A. Herrera-Campos et al. 2008 288-58 (MEXU). Scales: A–D & G = 1 mm; E = 10 μm; F = 0.5 mm. In colour online.

Thallus corticolous, orbicular or irregularly spreading, adnate to loosely adnate, up to 6 cm wide. Lobes up to 2 mm wide, plane to slightly convex, irregularly branched, discrete when young, and commonly imbricate in older thalli; margin entire to crenate, sometimes slightly raised; apices rounded to truncate. Upper surface grey bluish when young and later grey, dull, frosted-pruinose throughout, but the pruina often disappearing in the centre of older thalli. Soralia frequent and abundant, but not always present, originating from the lobe sinuses at the centre of the lobes, soralia appearing as laminal or marginal if lobe sinuses get concealed with the growth of the thalli; on the centre of old thalli soralia appearing as almost labiate. Lower surface whitish to pale brown; rhizines white to black, spare, denser at the margins, simple with a squarrose tuft at the tip. Upper cortex paraplectenchymatous, lower cortex mostly resembling a paraplectenchyma although cells are not always rounded or angular and hyphae can occasionally still be distinguished.

Apothecia common, 0.5–2.5 mm wide, sessile, convex in larger apothecia; margin persistent, not sorediate; disc light brown, not pruinose, lower than the thalline margin. Ascospores intermediate between Pachysporaria and Physcia-type, 20–25 × 10–12.5 μm.

Chemistry

TLC results show atranorin, zeorin and several other unknown triterpenes. Spot test: K+ yellow on cortex and medulla, all other reactions negative.

Etymology

The epithet refers to the use of this species by Psychidae caterpillars to construct their bags.

Ecology and distribution

The new species is so far known only from the tropical dry forest in and around the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, Mexico. It was found associated with Bursera sp., Erythrina lanata and several other unidentified trees, both at the understorey and the canopy. Physcia ornamentalis was also found growing on old flagging, and most notably, it was one of the main materials used by Psychidae caterpillars in the construction of their bags, as noted by Miranda-González et al. (Reference Miranda-González, McCune and Moldenke2023) and identified in that paper as Physcia undulata s. lat. The presence of triterpenes might explain the high use of P. ornamentalis as bag material by Psychidae caterpillars, given that such compounds often display antimicrobial properties (Jasso de Rodríguez et al. Reference de Rodríguez D, Angulo-Sánchez and Hernández-Castillo2006; Mateos-Maces et al. Reference Mateos-Maces, Chávez-Servia, Vera-Guzmán, Aquino-Bolaños, Alba-Jiménez and Villagómez-González2020) and nests and refuges are important elements involved in the early colonization and regulation of microbiome assembly in developing animals (Campos-Cerda & Bohannan Reference Campos-Cerda and Bohannan2020).

Remarks

In one sequenced specimen (Herrera-Campos et al. 288-58), the thallus was abundantly covered with apothecia, but no soralia were found; nonetheless, the phylogenetic analysis confirms that both forms are the same species. Physcia ornamentalis will key out as Physcia undulata in most of the available keys around the world; however, it differs morphologically by having soralia originating in the lobe sinuses instead of in the lobe margins and by lacking soralia in the thalline margin of the apothecia. Physcia undulata was described from a small number of collections from Kenya and Ethiopia (Moberg Reference Moberg1986), and soon after it was reported for several places around the world, such as the Americas (Moberg Reference Moberg1990) and Australia (Elix Reference Elix2011). According to Moberg (Reference Moberg1990), the significant variability throughout its distribution, in thallus and ascospore size, suggests that P. undulata is probably a species complex. Physcia ornamentalis is phylogenetically close to a clade of Australian species including Physcia austrostellaris Elix., P. krogiae Moberg and P. tropica Elix (Fig. 2). Of these, the only species with a frosted-pruinose appearance is P. krogiae which differs from the new species by having laminal pustulate soralia. Physcia ornamentalis will key out in couplet 16 of Moberg (Reference Moberg1990) as: ‘Soralia originating from the lobe sinuses, ‘frosted’ at least along margins.’

Additional specimens examined

Mexico: Jalisco: La Huerta Mun., Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Estación de Biología Chamela, on Chachalacas trail, tropical dry forest, alt. 90 m, on bark of unknown trees, 2008, M. A. Herrera Campos et al. 2008 288-58 (MEXU), 2009, R. Miranda-González 1124 (MEXU), 2014, R. Miranda-González 4539 (MEXU); ibid.,, on Calandria trail, tropical dry forest, alt. 126 m, on bark of unknown tree, 2011, A. Barcenas Peña 4410 (MEXU); ibid., on Tejón trail, tropical dry forest, alt. 50 m, on old flagging attached to a tree, 2015, F. Campos-Cerda s. n. (MEXU); ibid., on bark of unknown tree, 2019, R. Miranda González 5111 (MEXU).

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by a CONACYT Ph.D. scholarship to F. Campos-Cerda from the Mexican Government (No. 231223). Research funding was granted to M. A. Herrera Campos by the program UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT (project IN211321). We thank Katherine Renton, Jorge H. Vega Rivera and Chamela Biological Station personnel for logistical support, as well as the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, UNAM. We are grateful for the services of the Laboratorio de Biología Molecular and the Laboratorio de Microscopía y Fotografía de la Biodiversidad II, as part of the Laboratorio Nacional de Biodiversidad (LANABIO) in the Instituto de Biología of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, and in particular for the technical support of Andrea Rubí Jiménez-Marín, Nelly María López Ortiz, Laura Margarita Márquez Valdelamar and Susana Guzmán Gómez.

Author Contributions

R. Miranda-González: conceptualization, investigation, resources, formal analysis, writing (original draft, review and editing) and funding acquisition. F. Campos-Cerda and M. A. Herrera-Campos: investigation, resources, writing (review and editing) and funding acquisition.

Author ORCIDs

Ricardo Miranda-González, 0000-0002-9495-8927; Felipe Campos-Cerda, 0000-0002-0595-7309; María de los Angeles Herrera-Campos, 0000-0002-3397-1896.

Competing Interests

The authors declare none.

Data Accessibility

Newly generated sequences have been deposited in GenBank. Nomenclatural novelties have been deposited in MycoBank.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0024282925000015.

Supplementary File S1. Concatenated alignment of the genetic markers nuITS and mtSSU used for the phylogenetic analyses of the genus Diploicia.

Supplementary File S2. Concatenated alignment of the genetic marker nuITS used for the phylogenetic analyses of selected species of Physcia.

References

Ai, M, Zhong, Q, Scheidegger, C, Wang, L and Wang, X (2022) Revision of Dimelaena Norman (Caliciaceae, Ascomycota) species containing usnic acid reveals a new species and a new combination from China. Phytotaxa 574, 259272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aptroot, A and Cáceres, MES (2014) A key to the corticolous microfoliose, foliose and related crustose lichens from Rondônia, Brazil, with the description of four new species. Lichenologist 46, 783799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, D, Friedl, T and Helms, G (2002) Vertical evolution and intragenic spread of lichen-fungal group I introns. Journal of Molecular Evolution 55, 7484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bungartz, F, Elix, JA, Kalb, K and Giralt, M (2016) New and overlooked species from the Galapagos Islands: the generic concept of Diploicia reassessed. Lichenologist 48, 489515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos-Cerda, F and Bohannan, B (2020) The nidobiome: a framework for understanding microbiome assembly in neonates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 35, 573582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elix, JA (2011) Physcia, Australian Physciaceae (Lichenised Ascomycota). [WWW document] URL http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/lichenlist/Physcia.pdf. [Accessed 21 February 2024].Google Scholar
Elix, JA (2014) A Catalogue of Standardized Chromatographic Data and Biosynthetic Relationships for Lichen Substances. Canberra: Published by the author.Google Scholar
Elix, JA, Corush, J and Lumbsch, HT (2009) Triterpene chemosyndromes and subtle morphological characters characterise lineages in the Physcia aipolia group in Australia (Ascomycota). Systematic Biology 7, 479487.Google Scholar
Esslinger, TL, Leavitt, SD and McCune, B (2020) Two closely related but morphologically disparate new species of Physcia from western North America. Bryologist 123, 204214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardes, M and Bruns, TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2, 113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, U and Seaward, MRD (1977) Lichen-invertebrate associations. In Seaward, MRD (ed.), Lichen Ecology. London: Academic Press, pp. 69119.Google Scholar
Grube, M and Arup, U (2001) Molecular and morphological evolution in the Physciaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycotina), with special emphasis on the genus Rinodina. Lichenologist 33, 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán-Guillermo, J, Sorcia-Navarrete, PL, Llarena-Hernandez, RC and Cárdenas-Mendoza, KDR (2021) Bactrospora totonacae (Arthoniales, Ascomycota), a new species from Veracruz. Acta Botanica Mexicana 128, e1900.Google Scholar
Helms, G, Friedl, T and Rambold, G (2003) Phylogenetic relationships of the Physciaceae inferred from rDNA sequence data and selected phenotypic characters. Mycologia 95, 10781099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera-Campos, MA, Barcenas-Peña, A, Miranda-González, R, Altamirano Mejía, M, Bautista González, JA, Martínez Colín, P, Sánchez Téllez, N and Lücking, R (2019) New lichenized Arthoniales and Ostropales from Mexican seasonally dry tropical forest. Bryologist 122, 6283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Rodríguez D, Jasso, Angulo-Sánchez, JL and Hernández-Castillo, FD (2006) An overview of the antimicrobial properties of Mexican medicinal plants. Advances in Phytomedicine 3, 325377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katoh, K and Standley, DM (2013) MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 772780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearse, M, Moir, R, Wilson, A, Stones-Havas, S, Cheung, M, Sturrock, S, Buxton, S, Cooper, A, Markowitz, S, Duran, C, et al. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 16471649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maass, JM, Ahedo-Hernández, R, Araiza, S, Verduzco, A, Martínez-Yrízar, A, JaramilloVJ, Parker G, Pascual, F, García-Méndez, G and Sarukhán, J (2018) Long-term (33 years) rainfall and runoff dynamics in a tropical dry forest ecosystem in western Mexico: management implications under extreme hydrometeorological events. Forest Ecology and Management 426, 717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, A, Martín, MP, Lücking, R and Lumbsch, HT (2008) Molecular phylogeny suggests synonymy of Thelotremataceae within Graphidaceae (Ascomycota: Ostropales). Taxon 57, 476486.Google Scholar
Mateos-Maces, L, Chávez-Servia, JL, Vera-Guzmán, AM, Aquino-Bolaños, EN, Alba-Jiménez, JE and Villagómez-González, BB (2020) Edible leafy plants from Mexico as sources of antioxidant compounds, and their nutritional, nutraceutical and antimicrobial potential: a review. Antioxidants 9, 541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCune, B (2017) Microlichens of the Pacific Northwest. Volume 1: Key to the Genera. Corvallis, Oregon: Wild Blueberry Media.Google Scholar
Miranda-González, R and McCune, B (2020) The weight of the crust: biomass of crustose lichens in tropical dry forest represents more than half of foliar biomass. Biotropica 52, 12981308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda-González, R, Bungartz, F, Lücking, R, Gaya, E, Mendonça, CO, Viñas-Portilla, C, Cáceres, MES and Herrera-Campos, MA (2022 a) Phylogeny of the Pyrenula ochraceoflava group (Pyrenulaceae) reveals near-cryptic diversification and the inclusion of the Mazaediothecium album aggregate. Bryologist 125, 541557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda-González, R, Epitacio-Joaquin, G, Tehler, A, Sánchez, Téllez, N and Herrera-Campos, MA (2022 b) Roccella ramitumidula (Roccellaceae), a new species from the tropical dry forest of Mexico. Bryologist 125, 477484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miranda-González, R, McCune, B and Moldenke, AR (2023) Lichens as material for Lepidoptera's housing: a molecular approach to a widespread and highly selective interaction. Fungal Ecology 61, 101195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, R (1986) The genus Physcia in East Africa. Nordic Journal of Botany 6, 843864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moberg, R (1990) The lichen genus Physcia in Central and South America. Nordic Journal of Botany 10, 319342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, MC, Crespo, A, Blanco, O, Hladun, N and Hawksworth, DL (2002) Molecular phylogeny and status of Diploicia and Diplotomma, with observations on Diploicia subcanescens and Diplotomma rivas-martinezii. Lichenologist 34, 509519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, P, Molins, A, Chiva, S, Bastida, J and Barreno, E (2020) Symbiotic microalgal diversity within lichenicolous lichens and crustose hosts on Iberian Peninsula gypsum biocrusts. Scientific Reports 10, 14060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadyeina, O, Grube, M and Mayrhofer, H (2010) A contribution to the taxonomy of the genus Rinodina (Physciaceae, lichenized Ascomycotina) using combined ITS and mtSSU rDNA data. Lichenologist 42, 521531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noguera, FA, Vega Rivera, JH, García Aldrete, AN and Quesada, M (2002) Historia Natural de Chamela. Mexico City: Instituto de Biología, UNAM.Google Scholar
Ohmura, Y, Sugimoto, M, Aung, MM and Tanaka, N (2020) Contribution to the knowledge of the Lichen Mycota of Myanmar (I) twenty species newly recorded from Southern Myanmar. Taiwania 65, 548558.Google Scholar
Orock, EA, Leavitt, SD, Fonge, BA, St Clair, LL and Lumbsch, HT (2012) DNA-based identification of lichen-forming fungi: can publicly available sequence databases aid in lichen diversity inventories of Mount Cameroon (West Africa)? Lichenologist 44, 833839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, M and Wedin, M (2017) Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae. Fungal Diversity 82, 221238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangsiruji, A, Meesim, S, Buaruang, K, Boonpragob, K, Mongkolsuk, P, Binchai, S, Pringsulaka, O and Parnmen, S (2020) Molecular systematics and species distribution of foliose lichens in the Gulf of Thailand mangroves with emphasis on Dirinaria picta species complex. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 42, 504514.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F, Teslenko, M, van der Mark, P, Ayres, DL, Darling, A, Höhna, S, Larget, B, Liu, L, Suchard, MA and Huelsenbeck, JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soto-Medina, E (2022) New records and a key for species of Synarthonia (lichenized Ascomycota: Arthoniaceae) in Colombia. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 46, 165168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamatakis, A (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 13121313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilgalys, R and Hester, M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172, 42384246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, XY, Li, LJ, Liu, D, Zhang, YY, Yin, AC, Zhong, QY, Wang, SQ and Wang, LS (2020) Two new species and six new records of Buellia s.l. (lichenized Ascomycota, Caliciaceae) from China. Bryologist 123, 431443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, TJ, Bruns, T, Lee, S and Taylor, J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In Innis, MA, Gelfand, DH, Sninsky, JJ and White, TJ (eds), PCR Protocols: a Guide to Methods and Applications. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 315322.Google Scholar
Yang, M, Wang, X, Liu, D, Zhang, Y, Li, L, Yin, A-C, Scheidegger, C and Wang, L (2018) New species and records of Pyxine (Caliciaceae) in China. MycoKeys 45, 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoller, S, Scheidegger, C and Sperisen, C (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31, 511516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. GenBank Accession numbers of new sequences generated in this study. – indicates missing data. * indicates holotypes. All samples are from Mexico (all specimens are deposited in MEXU).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Phylogeny of the genus Diploicia based on a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of the genetic markers nuITS and mtSSU. Support values are shown as numbers if ML bootstrap values are ≥ 70 and as bold branches if Bayesian posterior probabilities are ≥ 0.95. Bold names show new sequences from this study and * indicates sequences from the type collection. The name of each terminal branch includes GenBank numbers of nuITS/mtSSU with – indicating missing data.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Phylogeny of selected Physcia species based on a maximum likelihood (ML) analysis of the genetic marker nuITS. Support values are shown as numbers if ML bootstrap values are ≥ 70 and as bold branches if Bayesian posterior probabilities are ≥ 0.95. Bold names show new sequences from this study and * indicates sequences from the type collection. The name of each terminal branch includes GenBank numbers of nuITS.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Diploicia edulis. A–C & E, habit showing placodioid thalli, lecanorine apothecia and abundant pycnidia. D, Dirinaria-type ascospores. F, subhymenium treated with KOH and showing abundant oil droplets (arrow). G, section of a mature apothecium. A, B, D, F & G, R. Miranda-González 6011 (holotype, MEXU). C, R. Miranda-González 5208 (MEXU). E, R. Miranda-González 6012 (MEXU). Scales: A–C & E = 1 mm; D = 5 μm; F = 20 μm; G = 100 μm. In colour online.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Physcia ornamentalis. A & B, habit showing thallus with abundant pruina, apothecia and soralia. C, in situ use of P. ornamentalis (arrow) for bag construction by a Psychidae caterpillar. D, young thallus growing on a piece of flagging showing soralia originating from the lobe sinuses (arrow). E, ascospores showing an intermediate form between Physcia and Pachysporaria-type. F, lower surface uniformly white. G, old thallus showing abundant apothecia and lacking soralia. A, B, E & F, R. Miranda-González 5029 (holotype, MEXU). C, R. Miranda-González 18-2 (MEXU). D, F. Campos-Cerda s. n. (MEXU); G, M. A. Herrera-Campos et al. 2008 288-58 (MEXU). Scales: A–D & G = 1 mm; E = 10 μm; F = 0.5 mm. In colour online.

Supplementary material: File

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 1

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material
Download Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 2.2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 2

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material
Download Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 11.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 3

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material
Download Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 3.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 4

Miranda-González et al. supplementary material
Download Miranda-González et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 2.2 KB