Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:02:53.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sphinctrina paramerae, a new Mediterranean lichenicolous species with non-septate spores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2013

D. MUÑIZ
Affiliation:
Departament de Biologia Vegetal (Unitat de Botànica) Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avd. Diagonal 645, 08028, Barcelona, España. Email: [email protected]
E. LLOP
Affiliation:
Departament de Biologia Vegetal (Unitat de Botànica) Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avd. Diagonal 645, 08028, Barcelona, España. Email: [email protected]
N. L. HLADUN
Affiliation:
Departament de Biologia Vegetal (Unitat de Botànica) Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Avd. Diagonal 645, 08028, Barcelona, España. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The new species, Sphinctrina paramerae, is proposed. Characteristics of ascospores (size, morphology and ornamentation), apothecia (morphology, size and chemical reactions) and ecological features revealed significant differences between S. paramerae and the currently known species of Sphinctrina with non-septate ascospores. The new species grows on Pertusaria paramerae, epiphytic on the bark of Juniperus thurifera, which occurs on well-exposed areas of parameras in the Iberian high plateau and other montane Mediterranean areas.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramoff, M. D., Magelhaes, P. J. & Ram, S. J. (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 3642.Google Scholar
Crespo, A. & Vězda, A. (1985) Pertusaria paramerae sp. nov., un liquen epífito de los sabinares españoles. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 41: 254255.Google Scholar
Fries, E. (1825) Systema Orbis Vegetabilis. Lund: Typographia Academica.Google Scholar
Fries, E. (1828) Elenchus Fungorum. 2 vols. Greifswald: Moritz.Google Scholar
Fries, Th. M. (1861) Genera Heterolichenum Europaea recognita. Uppsala: Edquist et Soc.Google Scholar
Hladun, N. L. & Llimona, X. (2002–2007) Checklist of the Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. http://botanica.bio.ub.es/checklist/checklist.htm Google Scholar
Kalb, K. (2001) New or otherwise interesting lichens. I. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 78: 141167.Google Scholar
Löfgren, O. & Tibell, L. (1979) Sphinctrina in Europe. Lichenologist 11: 109137.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2004) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Selva, S. B. (2004) Coniocybe gracilescens and species of Sphinctrina with 1-septate spores. Symbolae Botanicae Uppsalensis 34: 1923.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. & Vinuesa, M. (2005) Chaenothecopsis in a molecular phylogeny based on nuclear rDNA ITS and LSU sequences. Taxon 54: 427442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibell, L. & Wedin, M. (2000) Mycocaliciales, a new order for nonlichenized calicioid fungi. Mycologia 92: 557581.Google Scholar
Wedin, M. & Tibell, L. (1997) Phylogeny and evolution of Calicaceae, Mycocaliciaceae, and Sphinctrinaceae (Ascomycota), with notes on evolution of the prototunicate ascus. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 12361242.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, I. & Shimada, R. (1980) Fine structures of lichen plectenchymas viewed with the scanning electron microscope. Bulletin of Hochi Gakuen Junior College 11: 1328.Google Scholar