Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:18:34.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rediscovering the rural landscape of Carthage's hinterland: a reassessment of the Carthaginian Countryside survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2016

Rachael A. Sycamore  and
Brian G. Buchanan
Rachael A. Sycamore
Affiliation:
University of Leicester.
Brian G. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Durham University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses a GIS analysis of the results of the Carthaginian Countryside survey conducted by Joseph Greene from 1979 to 1983. The 136 sites identified by the project constitute one of the largest datasets of site locations recorded in the hinterland of Carthage from multiple time periods. The results of this survey have not generally been integrated into modern studies of the region because the project was never fully published and has not been digitised. This paper discusses the challenges of working with legacy data and the importance of using GIS to both preserve and analyse the Carthaginian Countryside survey. The results presented here reveal new insights into the antiquity of the rural landscape around the city of Carthage and the importance of revisiting legacy datasets to contextualise current research.

تناقش هذه المقالة تحليل نظم المعلومات الجغرافية لنتائج مشروع الريف القرطاجي الذي قام به جوزيف غرين من عام 1979 حتى عام 1983. وتمثل المواقع التي يبلغ عددها 136 موقعاً والتي تم تحديدها في هذا المشروع واحدة من أكبر المجموعات البيانية للمواقع التي تم تسجيلها في مناطق قرطاجة النائية من عدة فترات زمنية. إن نتائج هذا المسح لم يتم شمولها، بشكل عام، في الدراسات الحديثة للمنطقة لأن المشروع لم يتم نشره بشكل كامل ولم يتم تحويله إلى بيانات رقمية. تناقش هذه الورقة تحديات العمل التي يتم مواجهتها عند العمل بإستخدام بيانات قديمة وأهمية استخدام نظم المعلومات الجغرافية وذلك من أجل الحفاظ على وتحليل مشروع الريف القرطاجي . إن النتائج التي ستقدم هنا تكشف عن رؤية جديدة لآثار الريف حول مدينة قرطاجة وأهمية إعادة دراسة مجموعة البيانات القديمة وذلك من أجل تأطير البحث الجاري حالياً.

Type
Articles
Information
Libyan Studies , Volume 47 , November 2016 , pp. 117 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Libyan Studies 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, P. 2008. Dealing with legacy data: an introduction. Internet Archaeology 24. doi: 10.11141/ia.24.8.Google Scholar
Babelon, E., Cagnat, R., and Reinach, S. 1893. Atlas archéologique de la Tunisie. E. Leroux, Paris.Google Scholar
Bevan, A., and Conolly, J. 2004. GIS, archaeological survey, and landscape archaeology on the island of Kythera, Greece. Journal of Field Archaeology 29.1–2: 123–38.Google Scholar
Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), The World Bank, and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). 2011. Global Rural-Urban Mapping Project, Version 1 (GRUMPv1): Urban Extents Grid. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), Palisades, NY. doi: 10.7927/H4GH9FVG. Accessed 20 January 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conolly, J., and Lake, M. 2006. Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Docter, R. 2003. The topography of archaic Carthage: preliminary results of recent excavations and some prospects. Talanta 34/35: 113–34.Google Scholar
Docter, R. 2009. Carthage and its hinterland. In Helas, S. and Marzoli, D. (eds), Iberia Archaeologica 13: Phönizisches und punisches Städtewesen. Verlag Philipp von Zabern, Mainz am Rhein: 179–89.Google Scholar
Fentress, E., and Docter, R. 2008. North Africa: rural settlement and agricultural production. In van Dommelen, P. and Bellard, C. (eds), Rural Landscapes of the Punic World. Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 11. Equinox Publishing Ltd, London: 101–28.Google Scholar
Freed, J. 2011. Bringing Carthage Home: The Excavations of Nathan Davis, 1856–1859. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Greene, J. 1983. Carthage survey. In Keller, D. and Rupp, D. (eds), Archaeological Survey in the Mediterranean Area. BAR International Series 155. Archaeopress, Oxford: 197–99.Google Scholar
Greene, J. 1986. The Carthaginian countryside: archaeological reconnaissance in the hinterland of ancient Carthage. PhD dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Greene, J. 1992. Une reconnaissance archéologique dans l'Arrière-Pays de la Carthage antique. In Ennabli, A. (ed.), Pour sauver Carthage: exploration et conservation de la cité punique, romaine et byzantine. UNESCO/ INAA, Paris: 195–98.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, M. 2014. The Military and Colonial Destruction of the Roman Landscape of North Africa, 1830–1900. Brill, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, H. Ben. 2000. Settlement structure. In Ørsted, P., Carlsen, J., Sebaï, L. and Hassen, H. (eds), Africa Proconsularis: Regional Studies in the Segermes Valley of Northern Tunisia. Vol. 3. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus: 58–68.Google Scholar
Hitchner, R. 1988. The Kasserine Archaeological Survey, 1982–1986 (University of Virginia, USA–Institut National d'Archéologie et d'Art de Tunisie. Antiquités africaines 24.1: 7–41.Google Scholar
Hitchner, R. 1992. The Kasserine Archaeological Survey, 1982–1985. In Africa: fouilles, monuments et collections archéologiques en Tunisie. University of Virginia, Charlottesville: 11–12.Google Scholar
Hitchner, R., Ellis, S., Graham, A., Mattingly, D., and Neuru, L. 1990. The Kasserine Archaeological Survey, 1987 (Institut National d'Archéologie et d'Art de Tunisie/University of Virginia, USA). Antiquités africaines 26.1: 231–59.Google Scholar
Institut Géographique National. 1954. Carte de Tunisie [map]. Sheet 20. Scale 1:50,000. Institut Géographique National, France.Google Scholar
Lancel, S. 1997. Carthage: A History. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. (Translated from French by Nevill, Antonia.)Google Scholar
Landsat. 2016. Landsat 1 and Landsat 8 Imagery. US Geological Survey. Distributed by the Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC) at USGS/EROS. http://lpdaac.usgs.gov. Accessed January 2016.Google Scholar
McCormick, M., Huang, G., Zambotti, G., and Lavash, J. 2013. Roman Road Network (Version 2008). DARMC Scholarly Data Series #2013–5. DARMC, Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D. 1988. Oil for export? A comparison of Libyan, Spanish and Tunisian oil production in the Roman Empire. Journal of Roman Archaeology 1: 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebbia, M., Leone, A., Bockmann, R., Hddad, M., Abdouli, H., Masoud, A., Elkendi, N., Hamoud, H., Adam, S., and Khatab, M. Forthcoming. Managing and preserving cultural heritage in conflict zones: developing a collaborative strategy in Libya. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.Google Scholar
Ørsted, P., Carlsen, J., Sebaï, L., and Hassen, H. (eds). 2000. Africa Proconsularis: Regional Studies in the Segermes Valley of Northern Tunisia, vol. 3. Aarhus University Press, Århus.Google Scholar
Ørsted, P., Ladjimi Sebaï, L., Ben Hassen, H., Ben Younes, H., Zoughlami, J., and Bejaoui, F. 1992. Town and countryside in Roman Tunisia: a preliminary report on the Tunisio-Danish survey project in the Oued R'mel basin in and around ancient Sergemes. Journal of Roman Archaeology 5: 69–96.Google Scholar
Peña, J., Rossiter, J., Wilson, A., Wells, C., Carroll, M., Freed, J., and Godden, D. 1998. Carthage Papers: The Early Colony's Economy, Water Supply, A Public Bath and the Mobilisation of State Olive Oil. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 28, Portsmouth, RI.Google Scholar
Stone, D. 1997. The development of an imperial territory: Romans, Africans, and the transformation of the rural landscape of Tunisia. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Stone, D. 2004. Problems and possibilities in comparative survey: a North African perspective. In Alcock, S. and Cherry, J. (eds), Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow Books, Oxford: 132–46.Google Scholar
van Dommelen, P. 2006. Punic farms and Carthaginian colonists: surveying Punic rural settlement in the central Mediterranean. Journal of Roman Archaeology 19: 7–28.Google Scholar
van Dommelen, P., and Bellard, C. 2008. Defining the Punic world and its rural contexts. In van Dommelen, P. and Bellard, C. (eds), Rural Landscapes of the Punic World. Monographs in Mediterranean Archaeology 11. Equinox Publishing Ltd, London: 1–21.Google Scholar
Wheatley, D., and Gillings, M. 2002. Spatial Technology and Archaeology: The Archaeological Applications of GIS. Taylor & Francis, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckler, O. 2005. Arab Political Demography: Population Growth and Natalist Policies, Vol. 1. Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Witcher, R. 2008. (Re)surveying the Mediterranean rural landscapes: GIS and legacy survey data. Internet Archaeology 24. doi: 10.11141/ia.24.2.Google Scholar
Witcher, R. 2011. Missing persons? Models of Mediterranean regional survey and ancient populations. In Bowman, A. and Wilson, A. (eds), Settlement, Urbanism and Population. Oxford Studies in the Roman Economy 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford: 36–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witcher, R., and Craven, M. 2012. ‘Much that has long been hidden’: reconstructing the survey methodology. In Cascino, R., Di Giuseppe, H. and Patterson, H. (eds), Veii: The Historical Topography of the Ancient City: A Restudy of John Ward-Perkin's Survey. Archaeological Monographs of the British School at Rome. The British School at Rome, London: 9–24.Google Scholar