Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:33:39.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yuval Shany, Questions of Jurisdiction and Admissibility before International Courts, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016, 166 pp., ISBN 9781107038790 (hb), $110,00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

Michail Vagias
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 449 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shany, Y., Questions of Jurisdiction and Admissibility before the International Courts (2015), 8.Google Scholar

2 Shany, Y., Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts (2014), 69–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Shany, supra note 1, at 28.

4 Pollack, M.A. and Elsig, M., ‘Agents, Trustees and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointments at the World Trade Organization’, (2012) European Journal of International Relations, 1–25Google Scholar; see also Alter, K.J., ‘Delegating to International Courts: Self-Binding vs. Other-Binding Delegation’, (2008) 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 37–76.Google Scholar

5 Shany, supra note 1, at 55.

6 Shany, supra note 1, at 59.

7 Shany, supra note 1, at 66.

8 Application on the Convention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia v. Serbia), Judgment of 26 February 2007, [2007] ICJ Rep. 43, at 85; Legality on the Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium), Judgment of 15 December 2004, [2004] ICJ Rep. 279, at 299.

9 Shany, supra note 1, at 75.

10 Judgment No. 2867 of the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labor Organization Upon a Complaint Filed against the International Fund for Agricultural Development, Advisory Opinion of 1 February 2012, [2012] ICJ Rep. 10.

11 Shany, supra note 1, at 110.

12 Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Judgment of 4 June 2008, [2008] ICJ Rep. 177, at 204–6, paras. 60–5.

13 Shany, supra note 1, at 120.

14 Shany, supra note 1, at 121.

15 Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Croatia v. Serbia), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 18 November 2008, [2008] ICJ Rep. 412.

16 Shany, supra note 1, at 158.

17 Shany, supra note 1, at 143–5.

18 Shany, supra note 2.

19 Shany, supra note 1, at 20–1 (references omitted).

20 The question of Palestine has been pending since at least 1967, whereas the UN recognized Western Sahara as a non-self-governing territory in 1963. In detail for Palestine, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004, [2004] ICJ Rep. 136, at 166, paras. 71–3; for Sahara, Western, Kassoti, E., ‘The Front Polisario v. Council Case: The General Court, Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit and the External Aspect of European Integration (First Part)’, (2017) 2 European Papers 339Google Scholar, at 342–3.

21 See, for example, Erdal v. Council of Ministers, Arbitragehof (Constitutional Court), Decision no. 73/2005, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts, ILDC 9, (BE 2005) (20 April 2005) (Belg.), with comments by Cedric Ryngaert (rules of jurisdiction as substantive criminal law rules).

22 Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece intervening), Judgment of 3 February 2012, [2012] ICJ Rep. 99, at 140, para. 93.