Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:07:21.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Ways of Knowing International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2014

VILJAM ENGSTRÖM
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
REVIEW ESSAYS
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 525 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., M. N. Shaw, International Law (2008).

2 See, e.g., M. Evans, International Law (2010).

3 See, e.g., A. Abass, Complete International Law: Text, Cases, Materials (2011).

4 See, e.g., M. Dixon, Textbook on International Law (2013).

5 For one interesting study, see Hakalehto-Wainio, S., ‘The Challenges in Teaching Law – Tort Law as an Example’, (2009) 3–4 Tidskrift utgiven av Juridiska Föreningen i Finland (JFT) 269Google Scholar. Similar findings are at the heart of e.g. Maughan, C., ‘Why Study Emotion?’, in Maharg, P. and Maughan, C., Emerging Legal Learning: Affect and Legal Education: Emotion in Learning and Teaching the Law (2011) 11, at 28Google Scholar, and Jacobson, M. H. S., ‘A Primer on Learning Styles: Reaching Every Student’, (2001) 25 Seattle University Law Review 139, at 139–40Google Scholar.

6 See MacLellan, E. and Soden, R., ‘Expertise, Expert Teaching, and Experienced Teachers’ Knowledge of Learning Theory’, (2003) 35 Scottish Educational Review 110, at 112Google Scholar, and Sfard, A., ‘On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One’, (1998) 27 Educational Researcher 4, at 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See Sfard, ibid., at 6–7.

8 S. Rowland, Enquiring University (2006), at 17–18.

9 See Maughan, supra note 5, at 29.

10 See, e.g., Stark, R.et al., ‘Overcoming Problems of Knowledge Application and Knowledge Transfer’, in Boshuizen, H. P. A., Bromme, R., and Gruber, H. (eds), Professional Learning: Gaps and Transitions on the Way from Novice to Expert (2004), 1 at 1Google Scholar.

11 See, e.g., Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., and Ericsson, K. A., ‘Studies of Expertise from Psychological Perspectives’, in Ericsson, A. K.et al., The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (2006), 41–67, as well as many other contributions in the same bookCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 See, e.g., Maughan, supra note 5, at 29, and Walsh, T., ‘Putting Justice Back Into Legal Education’, (2008) 17 Legal Education Review 119Google Scholar.

13 Sinatra, G. and Mason, L., ‘Beyond Knowledge: Learner Characteristics Influencing Conceptual Change’, in Vosniadou, S. (ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (2008), 560Google Scholar.

14 An introduction, albeit not in the field of legal research, is provided by Tippett, C. D., ‘Refutation Text in Science Education: A Review of Two Decades of Research’, (2010) 8 International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 951CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Report of the International Law Commission, Sixty-Third session (26 April–3 June and 4 July–12 August 2011), General Assembly, Official Records, Sixty-Sixth session, Supplement No. 10 (A/66/10).

16 I. Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law (2008), at 575–8.

17 Vermunt, J. D., ‘The Power of Teaching–Learning Environments to Influence Student Learning’, in Student Learning and University Teaching (British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series) (2007), 73, at 74–7Google Scholar. For one overview of the discussion of learning styles in the US, see, e.g., E. A. DeGroff and K. A. McKee, ‘Learning Like Lawyers: Addressing the Differences in Law Student Learning Styles’, (2006) Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal 49.

18 See Vermunt, ibid., at 86.