Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:27:44.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prosecutor v. Naser Orić: The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Judgment of Srebrenica's Muslim Wartime Commander

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2007

Abstract

In certain quarters of the former Yugoslavia, the ICTY judgment issued on 30 June 2006 in Prosecutor v. Naser Orić has been strongly criticized for meting out a two-year prison sentence to the Bosnian Muslim wartime commander of Srebrenica. After a short sketch of the factual background which the trial chamber considered to be the pivotal sentencing factor, this note focuses on the legal issues underlying his conviction for having failed to prevent the murder and cruel treatment of a number of Serb prisoners. In particular, the trial chamber's interpretation of the standard of ‘reason to know’ of these crimes deserves attention. The judgment also gave rise to other significant developments, such as the approach to repeated prosecutorial violations of its disclosure obligations and an important clarification regarding the scope and nature of crimes committed by subordinates of a superior.

Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia
Copyright
© 2006 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)