No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2017
1 d'Aspremont, J., ‘International Customary Investment Law: Story of a Paradox’, in Gazzini, T. and De Brabandere, E. (eds.), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (2012), 5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, at 8.
2 Philip Morris Brands Sarl et al v. Oriental Republic of Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award, 8 July 2016, paras. 290–301.
3 P. Dumberry, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (2016), 1.
4 ILC Special Rapporteur Sir Michael Wood, Second Report on Identification of Customary International Law (2014), UN Doc. A/CN.4/672, at 11, 14.
5 Dumberry, supra note 3, at 9.
6 A. Roberts, ‘Custom, Public Law and Human Rights Analogy’, EJIL:Talk!, 14 August 2013, available at www.ejiltalk.org/custom-public-law-and-the-human-rights-analogy.
7 Dumberry, supra note 3, at 47.
8 ‘Identification of Customary International Law’, Report of the ILC 68th session (2016), UN Doc. A/71/10, at 92, para. 5.
9 Ibid.
10 Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 24 May 2007, [2007] ICJ Rep. 582, at 615, para. 90.
11 Dumberry, supra note 3, at 185.
12 Ibid., at 293.
13 Ibid., at 334.
14 Ibid., at 373–82.
15 Ibid., at 410.