Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:23:45.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Lack of Attention to the Distinction between Situations and Cases in National Laws on Co-operation with the International Criminal Court with Particular Reference to the Spanish Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2007

HÉCTOR OLÁSOLO
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines the impact of the distinction between situations and cases under the Rome Statute in national laws on co-operation with the ICC. It argues that this distinction is likely to create difficulties in three areas: (i) the communication of the notitia criminis to the Court; (ii) admissibility issues in proceedings under Articles 18 and 19 of the Statute; and (iii) the efficacy at national level of admissibility rulings by the Court.

Keywords

admissibilityInternational Criminal Courtnational co-operation with International Criminal Courtprinciple of complementarityuniversal jurisdiction
Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS: International Criminal Court
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 193 - 205
Copyright
© 2007 Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)