Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:46:18.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gaëtan Cliquennois , European Human Rights Justice and Privatisation: The Growing Influence of Foreign Private Funds, Cambridge University Press, 2020, 263 pp., ISBN 9781108497053, £85.00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2021

Ezgi Özlü
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 777 - 782
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of International Law and Dispute Resolution, Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law. 4, Rue Alphonse Weicker, L-2721 Luxembourg [[email protected]].

References

1 Especially under Rule 9 Procedure; see Rule 9, Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements, as amended on 18 January 2017 at the 1275th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

2 G. Cliquennois, European Human Rights Justice and Privatisation: The Growing Influence of Foreign Private Funds (2020), at 4–5.

3 Ibid., at 15–32.

4 Ibid., at 16–19.

5 Ibid., at 29–30.

6 Ibid., at 30–2.

7 Ibid., at 33–6.

8 Ibid., at 36.

9 Ibid., at 37–61.

10 Ibid., at 61–4, 182–7, 242–55.

11 Ibid., at 67–136.

12 Ibid., at 136–9.

13 Ibid., at 140–3.

14 Ibid., at 164.

15 Ibid., at 163–9.

16 Ibid., at 155–7.

17 Ibid., at 145.

18 Ibid., at 146–55.

19 Ibid., at 158–62.

20 Ibid., at 189–97.

21 Ibid., at 197–9.

22 Ibid., at 68–139, 173–9.

23 Ibid., at 220.

24 Ibid., at 241.

25 Ibid., at 252.

26 Ibid., at 252–8.

27 Ibid., at 242–51.

28 Ibid., at 236.

29 Ibid., at 201–20.

30 Ibid., at 221–8.

31 Ibid., at 235–6, 240.

32 Ibid., at 263.

33 Ibid., at xi.

34 G.Cliquennois and B. Champetier, ‘The Economic, Judicial and Political Influence Exerted by Private Foundations on Cases Taken by NGOs to the European Court of Human Rights: Inklings of a New Cold War?: The Economic, Judicial and Political Influence’, (2016) 22 European Law Journal 92.

35 Cliquennois, supra note 2, at 155.

36 Ibid., at 107.

37 Ibid., at 50–3.

38 Ibid., at 175–9, 182–7.

39 Nikolova v. Romanian CEZ Electricity, C-83/14, 16 July 2015, CJEU; Cliquennois, ibid., at 103–4.

40 Horváth and Kiss v. Hungary, no. 11146/11, 29 January 2013; Cliquennois, ibid., at 105.

41 Fadeyeva v. Russia, no. 55723/00, ECHR 2005-IV; Cliquennois, ibid., at 100–1.

42 Cliquennois, ibid., at 179–81.

43 See, in general, the European Commission for Democracy through Law, Study on Individual Access to Constitutional Justice, Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 85th Plenary Session (Venice, 17–18 December 2010), CDL-AD(2010)039rev.

44 Cliquennois, supra note 2, at 31.

45 Ibid., at 65, 258–9.

46 See, in general, E. Lambert Abdelgawad,. ‘The Economic Crisis and the Evolution of the System Based on the ECHR: Is There Any Correlation?’, (2016) 22 European Law Journal 74, at 76–8.

47 Cliquennois, supra note 2, at 11–14.

48 Ibid., at 161.

49 Ibid., at 256–7.