Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:03:44.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

W. Michael Reisman and Christina Skinner, Fraudulent Evidence Before Public International Tribunals: The Dirty Stories of International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014, 234 pp. ISBN 9781107063396, $90.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Catherine H. Gibson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 384 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Questions Relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v. Australia), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures (17 December 2013). Australia acknowledged the raid and seizure, but argued that its actions were justified on national security grounds, and pledged that the seized documents would not be used in the arbitration. Questions Relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v. Australia); Written Observations of Australia on Timor-Leste's Request for provisional measures (13 January 2014); Written Undertaking by the Attorney-General of Australia (21 January 2014).

2 D. Anton, ‘The Timor Sea Treaty Arbitration: Timor-Leste Challenges Australian Espionage and Seizure of Documents’, 18(6) ASIL Insights, http://www.asil.org/insights/volume/18/issue/6/timor-sea-treaty-arbitration-timor-leste-challenges-australian-espionage> (accessed on 27 January 2015).

3 See, e.g., A. Sarvarian, Professional Ethics at the International Bar (2013); Karemaker, R., Taylor, B. D., and Pittman, T. W., ‘Witness Proofing in International Criminal Tribunals’, (2008) 21 LJIL 683Google Scholar; Ambos, K., ‘“Witness Proofing” before the International Criminal Court: A Reply to Karemaker, Taylor, and Pittman’, (2008) 21 LJIL 917CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Karemaker, R., Taylor, B. D. III, & Pittman, T. W., ‘Witness Proofing in International Criminal Tribunals: Response to Ambos’, (2008) 21 LJIL 911Google Scholar; Rogers, C. A., ‘Fit and Function in Legal Ethics: Developing a Code of Conduct for International Arbitration’, (2002) 23 Mich. J. Int’l L. 341Google Scholar; Turner, J. I., ‘Legal Ethics in the International Criminal Defense’, (2010) 10 Chi. J. Int’l L. at 685Google Scholar; Gibson, C. H., ‘Representing the United States Abroad: Proper Conduct of U.S. Government Attorneys in International Tribunals’, (2013) 44 Geo. J. Int’l Law 1167Google Scholar.