Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:19:40.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The UN Council for Namibia vs. Urenco, UCN and the state of the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Nico J. Schruver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nico Schrijver discusses the claim by the UN Council for Namibia against Ultra Centrifuge Nederland, Urenco, and The Netherlands in the case concerning the alleged illegal processing ofNamibian uranium. He analyzes the evolution of international law with respect to Namibia, the status of the UN Council for Namibia, the juridical value of Decree No.I, the contents of the writ of summons as well as the counter-arguments by The Netherlands government.

Type
Leading Articles
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , May 1988 , pp. 25 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cf. Rölling, B.V. A., International Law and the Maintenance of Peace, IV Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 25 (1973)Google Scholar

2. As quoted by ZackMn, R., The Problem of Namibia in International Law, 171 (II) Recueil des Cours de 1'AcadéJmie de Droit International 237 (1982).Google Scholar

3. id.,240.

4. Relevant basic documents on the Namibian question are contained in J. Dugard, The South West Africa/Namibia Dispute. Documents and Scholarly Writings on the Controversy between South Africa and the United Nations (1973); Vol. I.A.13.4. P.J.G. Kapteyn et al., International Organization and Integration (1981).

5. International Status of South West Africa, 1950 I.CJ. 128 (Advisory Opinion of July 11 1950).

6. For a review of the various decisions of the International Court of Justice on the South West Africa/Namibia question: Gill, T.D., South West Africa and the Sacred Trust (1984); Hevener, N.K., The 1971 South West Africa Opinion-A New International Juridical Philosophy, 24 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 809–810 (1975); J. Dugard, supra note 4; R. Zacklin, supra note 2.Google Scholar

7. South West Africa Cases, (Ethiopiaand Liberia vs. South Africa) 1962 ICJ 319 (Judgment of December 21 1962 on Preliminary Objections, and 1966 ICJ 6 (Final Judgment of July 18 1966).

8. Cf. Verwey, W.D., Decolonization and Ius ad Bellum: A Case Study on the Impact of the UN General Assembly on International Law, in R J. Akkerman et al., Declarations on Principles. A Quest for Universal Peace (Liber Röling) 121–140 (1977).Google Scholar

9. Cf. Schrijver, NJ., Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources versus the Common Heritage of Mankind: Complementary or Contradictory Principles of International Economic Law?, in PJ.I.M. de Waart et al.. International Law and Development (1988).Google Scholar

10. 1966 Yearbook of the United Nations 598–606.

11. 1967 Yearbook of the United Nations 689–697.

12. UN Security Council resolutions 245 (1968) and 246 (196

13. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276,19711.CJ. 16 (Advisory Opinion of June 21 1971).

14. Id.,47

15. Schemers, H.G., International Institutional Law, section 1652 (1980).Google Scholar

16. GA Res. 32/9 E, 4 November 1977.

17. R.H.F. Austin, Namibia and Zimbabwe: Decolonization and the Rule of International Law, 1982 Current Legal Problems 203–233.

18. Cf. Namibia: Road to Liberation, XX UN Chronicle no.3,17–32 (1983).

19. Cf. Nelissen, F.A., Het Walvisbaai-geschil (The Walvis Bay Dispute) 3–7 (University of Groningen, Development & Security, No. 23,1988); R. Moorsom, Walvis Bay, Namibia's Port (1984).Google Scholar

20. Annual Report of the UN Council for Namibia, 1983, UN Doc. A/38/24, para. 581.

21. id., para. 767; cf. Articles 56 and 75 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (1982).

22. Booysen, H. and Stephan, G.E.J., Decree No. 1 of the United Nations Council for South West Africa, 1 South African Yearbook of International Law 68 (1975).Google Scholar

23. Rigaux., F.Le décret sur lesressourcesnaturellesde laNamibie adopté le27septembre 1974par le Conseil des Nations Uniespour la Namibie, 9 Revue des droits de l'homme 473 (1976); cf. also his book Droit public et droit priv6 dans les relations internationales 284 (1977).Google Scholar

24. Schermers, H.G., The Namibia Decree in National Courts, 26 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 96 (1977).Google Scholar

25. Bowett, D.W., The Law of International Institutions, 4th ed., 65–69 (1982).Google Scholar

26. Cf. the text of paragraph 12 of UN Security Council resolution 301 (1971), see supra paragraph Illegal Occupation

27. Schermers, H.G., supra note 24,95; Cf. J.P. Verheul, Namibisch Uranium (in Dutch), 56 Nederlands Juristenblad 473 (1981).Google Scholar

28. Report of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Fifth Special Session and the Twenty-second Session of the UN General Assembly (1967), No. 87, The Hague, 1968,171.

29. Report of the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Thirtieth Session of the UN General Assembly (1975), No. 116, The Hague, 1976,548–549.

30. Cf. Huisman, R., Uraniumroof in Namibie (1978); Verheul, Namibisch Uranium, Nederlands JuristenBlad, 469–474 (1981).Google Scholar

31. For the Government's point of view until 1980, see Siekmann, , Uranium uit Namibie, 17 Intermediair 37–41 (27 februari 1981)Google Scholar

32. See Verslag van het Mondeling Overleg van de Vaste Kamercommissie voor Kernenergie en Buitcnlandse Zaken over Namibisch uranium (Report of the Consultation of the Parliamentary Committee for Nuclear Energy and Foreign Affairs on Namibian uranium), Kamerstuk 16 445, at 6 (1980–1981).

33. Report of the Mission of Consultation of the United Nations Council for Namibia to The Netherlands, 1981. UN Doc. A/AC.131/L.225 par. 27, June 25,1981.

34. Cf. the definition of the concept of a wrongful act (art. 1401 BW) in the Judgment of the Hoge Raad in Lindenbaum v.Cohen, Nederlandse Jurisprudence 161 (1919).

35. See, Reparations for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, 19491.C J. 174 (Advisory Opinion of April 111949).

36. CfANP-bulletin August 28,1985

37. Letter dd. July 23,1987, UN Doc A/42/414.

38. Tweede, Kamer (Second Chamber) 1987–1988 Appendix, questions sent in on September 2,1987Google Scholar

39. See Moorsom, R., Exploiting the Sea (A Future for Namibia, no.5, The Catholic Institute for International Relations, 1984); Times Atlas of the Oceans, 115 (1983).Google Scholar

40. Provisional Verbatim Report of the General Assembly of the UN, UN Doc. A/42/PV 59, at 82,(November 6,1987).

41. CfNuclear Tests Cases, (Austrialia vs. France and New Zealand vs. France) 19741.C.J. 253,457 (Judgment of December 20 1974).