Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T08:53:03.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Perspectives on Land Registration: Contemporary Problems and Solutions by Amy Goymour, Stephen Watterson, and Martin Dixon (eds). Oxford: Hart, 2018, 490 pp (£110.00 hardback). ISBN: 978-1-50990-603-1.

Review products

New Perspectives on Land Registration: Contemporary Problems and Solutions by Amy Goymour, Stephen Watterson, and Martin Dixon (eds). Oxford: Hart, 2018, 490 pp (£110.00 hardback). ISBN: 978-1-50990-603-1.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2019

Sarah E Hamill Open the ORCID record for Sarah E Hamill [Opens in a new window]
Sarah E Hamill*
Affiliation:
School of Law, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 550 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Legal Scholars 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Goymour, A et al. (eds) New Perspectives on Land Registration: Contemporary Problems and Solutions (Oxford: Hart, 2018) pp v–viGoogle Scholar.

2 Law Commission Updating the Land Registration Act 2002 (Law Com No 227).

3 Law Commission Updating the Land Registration Act 2002 (Law Com No 380).

4 Goymour et al, above n 1, p vi.

5 Goymour et al, above n 1, p vi.

6 See eg Carruthers, P ‘A tangled web indeed: the English Land Registration Act and comparisons with the Australian Torrens system’ (2015) 38(4) UNSWLJ 1261Google Scholar; Harding, M and Hickey, R ‘Bijural ambiguity and values in land registration systems’ in Bright, S (ed) Modern Studies in Property Law, Vol 6 (Oxford: Hart, 2011) p 281Google Scholar.

7 A Goymour and R Hickey ‘The continuing relevance of relativity of title under the Land Registration Act 2002’ in Goymour et al, above n 1, p 66.

8 Ibid, pp 68–69, 82–84.

9 Ibid, pp 88–89.

10 A Nair ‘Morality and the mirror: the normative limits of the “principles of land registration”’ in Bright, above n 6, p 263.

11 E Lees ‘Guaranteed title: no title, guaranteed’ in Goymour et al, above n 1, pp 98–99.

12 Ibid, p 98.

13 Ibid.

14 Ibid, pp 115–116.

15 S Watterson and A Goymour ‘A tale of three promises: setting the scene’ in Goymour et al, above n 1, p 277, quoting Southern Pacific Mortgages v Scott [2014] UKSC 52, [2015] AC 385, at [96].

16 Watterson and Goymour, above n 15, p 277.

17 Ibid, p 280.

18 S Cooper ‘Lack of proper care’ in Goymour et al, above n 1, p 175.

19 Ibid, p 175 referring to Gray, K and Gray, S ‘The rhetoric of reality’ in Getzler, J (ed) Rationalizing Property, Equity and Trusts (London: Butterworths, 2003) pp 205–206Google Scholar, pp 244–253 (no pinpoint is given by Cooper).

20 Lees, above n 11, p 116.

21 Kenneth GC Reid ‘De-throning king Midas: the new law of land registration in Scotland’ in Goymour et al, above n 1, p 157.

22 Reid, above n 21, p 160.

23 See eg Carruthers, above n 6; Harding and Hickey, above n 6.