Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:44:55.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Review in Perspective by Lee Bridges, George Meszaros and Maurice Sunkin. London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 1995, xi + 200 + (appendices and index) 23pp (paperback £19.95).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Brigid Hadfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , July 1996 , pp. 247 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Hadfield B and E Weaver Trends in Judicial Review in Northern Ireland 1994 Public Law, pp 12–16 and ‘Judicial Review in Perspective 46 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly (1995) pp 113–145, and T Mullen, T Prosser and K Pick Judicial Review in Scotland (1996).

2. M Beloff and T Kerr Why Aga Khan is Wrong’ [1996] JR 30.

3. Ibid. For a most valuable exposition of this point in a Northern Ireland case, see In Re Phillips (otherwise cited as R v Secretary of State. ex p Phillips). Unreported, Queen's Bench Division (Crown Side), judgment delivered by Carswell LJ 18 January 1995. (See p 20 of the transcript: ‘For my own part I would regard it as a preferable approach to consider the nature of the issue itself and whether it has the characteristics which import an element of public law…’). Carswell LJ's judgment was affirmed by the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal on 12 February 1996.

4. In ‘The Problematical State of Access to Judicial Review’ chapter I in B Hadfield (ed) Judicial Review: A Thematic Approach (1995).

5. See, eg. G Richardson and M Sunkin ‘Judicial Review: Questions of Impact’ 1996 Public Law, pp 79–103.