Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:06:10.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining the reception of the Code Napoleon in Germany: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

TT Arvind  and
Lindsay Stirton
TT Arvind
Affiliation:
York Law School, University of York
Lindsay Stirton
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the diverse responses of the German states to the Code Napoleon at the beginning of the nineteenth century. These states differed both in the extent to which they adopted the Code, and the extent to which they retained the Code after Napoleon's influence waned. In order to identify the causes of adoption and retention of the Code, we use fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). This method is now well established in comparative research in the social sciences but has been little used in comparative legal analysis. We find the following to be among the conditions relevant to the reception of the Code: territorial diversity, control by Napoleon, central state institutions, a feudal economy and society, liberal (enlightented absolutist) rule, nativism among the governing elites and popular anti-French sentiment. The paper also serves to demonstrate the potential of fsQCA as a method for comparative lawyers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 1 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Winner of the SLS Best Paper Prize 2009. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at departmental seminars in York and Manchester. We would like to thank the participants at these sessions and to the following individuals for encouragement and sometimes critical suggestions: Oscar Alvarez-Macotela, John Bell, Jurgen De Wispelaere, Stefan Enchelmeier, Paula Giliker, William Lucy, Hisako Nomura, Mathias Siems and Jenny Steele. For the remaining errors and omissions, each co-author blames the other.

References

1. RC van Caenegem Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History Goodhart Lectures 1984–1985 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987) pp 48–50 and 152–155.

2. Krebs, T Restitution at the Crossroads: A Comparative Study (London: Routledge Cavendish, 2001) p 15 Google Scholar.

3. Merryman, JH The French deviation’ (1996) 44 American Journal of Comparative Law 109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. H Blackenburg ‘The extension of the Code Napoleon into Germany’, PhD thesis (University of Wisconsin, 1931).

5. Hull, IV Sexuality, State and Civil Society in Germany: 1700–1815 (Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1997) pp 372–402 Google Scholar.

6. Crosby, MB The Making of a German Constitution: A Slow Revolution (Oxford: Berg Publishers, 2008) pp 68–71 Google Scholar.

7. Weinacht, P-L The sovereign German states and the Code Napoléon: what spoke for its adoption in the Rhine Confederation?’ (2002) 14 European Journal of Law and Economics 205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 210.

8. E Fehrenbach Der Kampf um die Einführung des Code Napoleon in den Rheinbundstaaten Institut für Europäische Geschichte Mainz Vorträge Nr 56 (Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1973) pp 7–39.

9. For a review of this literature by some of its main contributors, see La Porta, R, De Silanes, FL and Shleiffer, A The economic consequences of legal origins’ (2008) 46 Journal of Economic Literature 285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Grab, A Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe European History in Perspective (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003) pp 88–92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Blackbourn, D The Long Nineteenth Century (London: Fontana Press, 1997) pp 75–78 Google Scholar.

12. Beiser, FC Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992) pp 13–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13. Ogilvie, SC Proto-industrialization in Germany’ in Ogilvie, SC and Cerman, M (eds) European Proto-Industrialization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 1996) pp 118–136 Google Scholar.

14. Blackbourn, above n 11, pp 31–34.

15. Wieacker, F A History of Private Law in Europe [Weir, Tony (transl)] (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) pp 257–260 Google Scholar.

16. Ibid, p 264.

17. Ibid, pp 267–269.

18. Weinacht, above n 7, at 207–208.

19. Fehrenbach, above n 8, p 45.

20. Ibid, pp 43–44.

21. W Schubert Franzsisches Recht in Deutschland zu Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts: Zivilrecht, Gerichtsverfassungsrecht und Zivilprozessrecht Forschungen zur neueren Privatrechtsgeschichte, bd. 24 (Kln: Bhlau, 1977) pp 128–131.

22. P Nolte Staatsbildung als Gesellschaftsreform: politische Reformen in Preussen und den süddeutschen Staaten, 1800–1820 Historische Studien Bd 2 (Frankfurt: Campus, 1990).

23. Sheehan, JJ German History, 1770–1866 The Oxford History of Modern Europe (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993) p 274 Google Scholar.

24. Lefebvre, G Napoleon vol 1 [Stockhold, HF (transl)] (London: Routledge, 1969) p 239 Google Scholar.

25. Wagner, W Geltungsbereiche ausländischer Kodificationen im Deutschen Reich vor Inkrafttreten des Bgb’ (1987) 14 Ius Commune 203 Google Scholar at 211–216.

26. Wieacker, above n 15, p 274.

27. Rihoux, B Qualitative comparative analysis (Qca) and related systematic comparative methods: recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research’ (2006) 21 International Sociology 679 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 680.

28. Herrmann, AM and Cronqvist, L When dichotomisation becomes a problem for the analysis of middle-sized datasets’ (2009) 12 International Journal of Social Research Methodology 33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Ragin, CC Fuzzy Set Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000)Google Scholar ch 11.

30. Siems, MM Numerical comparative law – do we need statistical evidence in law in order to reduce complexity?’ (2005) 13 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 521 Google Scholar.

31. Wagner, above n 25, at 206.

32. Hull, above n 5, p 373.

33. Grab, above n 10, p 90.

34. Blackenburg, above n 4, p 213.

35. Grab, above n 10, p 97.

36. Weinacht, above n 7, at 213.

37. Wieacker, above n 15, pp 261 and 266.

38. Cassin, R Codification and national unity’ in Schwartz, B (ed) The Code Napoleon and the Common Law World (New York: New York University Press, 1956) pp 46–54 Google Scholar at pp 46–49.

39. Blackbourn, above n 11, p 14.

40. Brose, ED German History, 1789–1871: From the Holy Roman Empire to the Bismarckian Reich (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1997) p 53 Google Scholar.

41. Walker, M German Home Towns: Community, State, and General Estate, 1648–1871 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998) p 197 Google Scholar.

42. Sheehan, J German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (London: Methuen, 1982) p 35 Google Scholar.

43. Walker, above n 41, pp 198–210.

44. Blackbourn, above n 11, p 77.

45. Brose, above n 40, p 53.

46. Fehrenbach, above n 8, pp 7–39.

47. Gooch, GP Germany and the French Revolution New impression edition (London: Frank Cass & Co, 1965) pp 494–496 Google Scholar.

48. Ibid, pp 456–457.

49. Lefebvre, above n 24, p 244.

50. Wieacker, above n 15, pp 273–274.

51. Fehrenbach, above n 8, pp 49–50.

52. Weinacht, above n 7, p 208.

53. van Caenegem, above n 1, pp 48–50.

54. Hope, N German and Scandinavian Protestantism: 1700–1918 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) p 328 Google Scholar.

55. Rose, EC Portraits of our Past: Jews of the German Countryside (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2001) pp 45–46 Google Scholar.

56. Blackbourn, above n 11, pp 77–78.

57. Hope, above n 54, pp 327–329.

58. Fehrenbach, above n 8, pp 43–44.

59. Schachter, G and Engelbourg, S Cultural Continuity in Advanced Economies: Britain and the US versus Continental Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005) p 65 Google Scholar.

60. Fehrenbach, above n 8, p 41.

61. Blackenburg, above n 4, pp 267–269.

62. Miller, JM A typology of legal transplants: using sociology, legal history and Argentine examples to explain the transplant process’ (2003) 51 American Journal of Comparative Law 839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 845–858.

63. Hahn, H-W Wirtschaftliche Integration im 19. Jahrhundert: die hessischen Staaten und der Deutsche Zollverein Kritische Studien zur Geschichtswissenschaft, bd. 52 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1982) pp 30–32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64. Ramm, A Germany 1789–1919: A Political History (London: Methuen, 1967) pp 76–79 Google Scholar.

65. Sagarra, E A Social History of Germany, 1648–1914 (London: Metheun, 1977) p 188 Google Scholar.

66. Fehrenbach, above n 8, pp 18–26.

67. Ibid, 46–51.

68. Fisher, Hal Studies in Napoleonic Statesmanship: Germany (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1903) p 257 Google Scholar.

69. Sheehan, above n 23, p 272.

70. Andreas, W Die Einführung des Code Napoleon in Baden’ (1910) 31 Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Germanistische Abteilung 182 Google Scholar at 218–227.

71. Rowe, M Between empire and home town: Napoleonic rule on the Rhine’ (1999) 42 Historical Journal 643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 648–649.

72. Grab, above n 10, p 94.

73. Diefendorf, JM Businessmen and Politics in the Rhineland, 1789–1834 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980) pp 255–259 Google Scholar and 283–284.

74. Schmidt, C Le Grand-Duché de Berg (1806–1813) (Paris: Ancienne Librairie Germer Bailliere, 1905) p 225 Google Scholar.

75. Ibid, pp 220–5.

76. Schmidt, J Liberalism and enlightenment in eighteenth-century Germany’ (1999) 13 Critical Review 31 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77. Blackbourn, above n 11, pp 130–131.

78. Blanning, Tcw The French Revolution in Germany: Occupation and Resistance in the Rhineland, 1792–1802 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983) p 57 Google Scholar.

79. Gooch, above n 47, p 507.

80. Grab, W Norddeutsche Jakobiner: Demokratische Bestrebungen zur Zeit der Französischen Revolution Hamburger Studien zur neueren Geschichte, band 8 (Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1967)Google Scholar.

81. Blanning, Tcw, ‘Review: German Jacobins and the French Revolution’ (1980) 23 The Historical Journal 985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 991–996.

82. Rowe, M From Reich to State: Tthe Rhineland in the Revolutionary Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) pp 81–82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83. Crosby, above n 6, pp 68–71.

84. Redekop, BW Enlightenment and Community: Lessing, Abbt, Herder and the Quest for a German Public (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2000) pp 198–202 Google Scholar.

85. Schroeder, PW The Transformation of European Politics: 1763–1848, The Oxford History of Modern Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996) p 378 Google Scholar.

86. Blackenburg, above n 4, pp 220–221.

87. Ibid, p 287.

88. Blanning, above n 81, at 993.

89. Grab, above n 10, p 109.

90. Dwyer, PG Napoléon and Europe (Harlow: Longman, 2001) pp 109–110 Google Scholar.

91. Meijer, G and Meijer, Syth Influence of the Code Civil in the Netherlands’ (2002) 14 European Journal of Law and Economics 227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92. Rehberg, AW Ueber den Code Napoleon und dessen Einführung in Deutschland (Hannover: Hahn, 1814) pp 6–8 Google Scholar and 11–15.

93. Hagemann, K Francophobia and patriotism: anti-French images and sentiments in Prussia and northern Germany during the anti-Napoleonic wars’ (2004) 18 French History 404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 406 and 423–424.

94. Wagner, above n 25, at 206.

95. Schmidt, above n 74, p 225.

96. Rowe, above n 71, at 650.

97. Glassman, RM The Middle Class and Democracy in Socio-Historical Perspective (Leiden: Brill, 1995) p 171 Google Scholar.

98. Grab, above n 10, pp 94–95.

99. Blanning, above n 78, pp 207–254.

100. Kisch, H From Domestic Manufacture to Industrial Revolution: The Case of the Rhineland Textile Districts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989) pp 206–210 Google Scholar.

101. Blackenburg, above n 4, pp 238–241.

102. Rowe, above n 71, at 651.

103. Blackenburg, above n 4, pp 290–291.

104. Brose, above n 40, p 53.

105. Walker, above n 41, p 197.

106. Weinacht, above n 7, p 209.

107. Schubert, above n 21, pp 128–131.

108. Fehrenbach, above n 8, p 45.

109. Schneid, FC Napoleon's Conquest of Europe: The War of the Third Coalition (Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, 2005) p 118 Google Scholar.

110. A similar point has been made by scholars critical of the claims of the legal origins theorists. See, eg Siems, M Legal origins: reconciling law & finance and comparative law’ (2007) 52 McGill Law Review 55 Google Scholar.

111. We are grateful to Mathias Siems for this point.

112. (1868) LR 3 HL 330.

113. See further Ragin, C Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy-Sets and Beyond (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ch 5.

114. Blackenburg, above n 4.

115. Fehrenbach, E Traditionale Gesellschaft und revolutionares Recht: die Einführung des Code Napoleon in den Rheinbundstaaten Kritische Studien zur Geschichtswissenschaft, bd. 13 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1974)Google Scholar.

116. Schubert, above n 21.

117. The software, fs/QCA, is available as a free download from Charles Ragin's web pages on the University of Arizona website, available at http://www.u.arizona.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml.

118. Ragin, above n 29, pp 107–115.

119. See Ragin, above n 113, ch 9 for further details.

120. See ibid, ch 3 for further details.