No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
1. Heinze, E The Concept of Injustice (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013) pp 6–7; his emphasis.Google Scholar
2. Ibid, his emphasis.
3. Ibid, p 5.
4. Ibid, p 1.
5. Ibid.
6. Ibid, p 9; his emphasis.
7. Ibid.
8. Ibid, p 10.
9. Ibid, p 11; his emphasis.
10. Ibid, p 16.
11. Ibid, p 27.
12. Ibid, p 32.
13. Ibid, p 4.
14. Ibid, p 47.
15. Ibid, pp 48–49.
16. Ibid, p 55.
17. Ibid, pp 54–55.
18. Ibid, pp 59–61.
19. Ibid, p 91.
20. Ibid, p 92.
21. Ibid.
22. Ibid, pp 99–100.
23. Ibid, pp 102–103.
24. Ibid, p 11.
25. Ibid, p 105.
26. Ibid, pp 105–106.
27. Ibid, p 114.
28. Ibid, p 121.
29. Ibid, p 11.
30. Ibid, pp 135, 127.
31. Ibid, p 124.
32. Ibid, p 125.
33. Ibid, p 129.
34. Ibid, p 135; his emphasis.
35. Ibid; his emphasis.
36. Ibid, pp 136, 153.
37. Ibid, pp 154–161.
38. Ibid, pp 162, 165.
39. Ibid, pp 171–181.
40. Ibid, pp 182–185.
41. Ibid, p 197; his emphasis.
42. Ibid, p 130.
43. Daniel, D ‘ “Let me have judgment, and the Jew his will”: melancholy epistemology and masochistic fantasy in The Merchant of Venice’ (2010) 61(2) Shakespeare Q 206.Google Scholar
44. Constable, M Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005) p 176.Google Scholar
45. Heinze, above n 1, p 16.
46. Ibid, p 42.
47. Ibid, p 47.
48. See Howe, A ‘ “Red mist” homicide – sexual infidelity and the English law of murder (glossing Titus Andronicus)’ (2013) 3 Legal Stud 407.Google Scholar