No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
1 Preface, p v.
2 Preface, p v.
3 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992). See ch 3 of An Introduction to Comparative Law, entitled ‘The Method of Comparative Law at p 38, where the authors state that ’the basic methodological principle of all comparative law is that of functionality.
4 See eg pp 20–21.
5 See eg p 25.
6 Seep 21.
7 See generally G Samuel The Foundations of Legal Reasoning (Antwerp: Maklu, 1994).
8 See pp 23–24.
9 See pp 246–249.
10 See Zweigert and Kötz above n 3.
11 (1992) 2 AC 128.
12 See p 41.
13 See S Weatherill ‘Prospects for the development of European Private Law Through Europeanisation in the European Court - The Case of the Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts in (1995) 3 European Rev Private Law 307–328 at 313.
14 See Preface at p v.
15 … despite all these claims that the comparatist be open-minded and think supra-nationally, the civil and common law still rule over the comparatists world. G. Frankenberg: Critical Comparisons: Rethinking Comparative law in (1985) Harvard International LJ vol 26. no 2 at 442.