Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 March 2018
Against a backdrop of increasing data security and privacy concerns, current data protection law will soon be overhauled by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Previous research has indicated a lack of data protection management in libraries, however, it has been nine years since the latest study. This article by Josephine Bailey aims to provide an updated review of the extent of data protection management in UK library and information services and gauge preparation for the incoming GDPR.
1 YouGov. (2017). Survey Report. Retrieved 2 August 2017, from https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/guozfocn1q/YGC,%20GB%20Surveillance%202017.pdf
2 PolicyBee LLP. (2017). The UK's biggest cybersecurity and data breaches in 2017. Retrieved 2 August 2017, from https://www.policybee.co.uk/blog/13456/uk-biggest-cybersecurity-and-data-breaches-in-2017/
3 Office of National Statistics. (2017, 20 July). Crime in England and Wales: Appendix Tables. Retrieved 2 August 2017, from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/datasets/crimeinenglandandwalesappendixtables
4 Kim, D. & Noh, Y. (2014). A Study of Public Library Patrons' Understanding of Library Records and Data Privacy. International Journal Of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 4(1), 53–78 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.5865/ijkct.2014.4.1.053
5 Magi, T. (2007). The gap between theory and practice: A study of the prevalence and strength of patron confidentiality policies in public and academic libraries. Library & Information Science Research, 29(4), 455–470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.001
6 Bowers, S. (2006). Privacy and Library Records. The Journal Of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 377–383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.005
7 Boehme-Neßler, V. (2016). Privacy: a matter of democracy. Why democracy needs privacy and data protection. International Data Privacy Law, 6(3), 222–229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipw007
8 Zimmer, M. (2014). Librarians' Attitudes Regarding Information and Internet Privacy. The Library Quarterly, 84(2), 123–151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/675329
9 Coombs, K. (2004). Walking a Tightrope: Academic Libraries and Privacy. The Journal Of Academic Librarianship, 30(6), 493–498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.08.003
10 Sturges, P., Davies, E., Dearnley, J., Iliffe, U., Iliffe, U., Oppenheim, C., & Hardy, R. (2003). User privacy in the digital library environment: an investigation of policies and preparedness. Library Management, 24(1/2), 44–50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01435120310454502
11 Johns, S., & Lawson, K. (2005). University undergraduate students and library-related privacy issues. Library & Information Science Research, 27(4), 485–495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.006
12 Sutlieff, L. & Chelin, J. (2010). ‘An absolute prerequisite’: The importance of user privacy and trust in maintaining academic freedom at the library. Journal Of Librarianship And Information Science, 42(3), 163–177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000610368916
13 Estabrook, Leigh S (1996). Sacred trust or competitive opportunity: using patron records. Library Journal. v121 (n2), p48(2)Google Scholar.
14 Boehme-Neßler, V. (2016). Privacy: a matter of democracy. Why democracy needs privacy and data protection. International Data Privacy Law, 6(3), 222–229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipw007
15 ibid.
16 Magi, T. (2007). The gap between theory and practice: A study of the prevalence and strength of patron confidentiality policies in public and academic libraries. Library & Information Science Research, 29(4), 455–470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.001