Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:45:18.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are User Surveys Fit for Purpose? A Case Study on the Use of a Contingent Valuation Survey at Middle Temple Library

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2020

Abstract

In this article, based on a presentation at the BIALL Annual Conference in 2019, Renae Satterley and Adam Woellhaf discuss the methodology and potential effectiveness of using contingent valuation surveys in law libraries. Their approach is based on the Middle Temple Library's experience of running such a survey in 2018.

Type
More Papers from the BIALL Conference 2019
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by British and Irish Association of Law Librarians

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aabø, Svanhild (2005), Are public libraries worth their price? a contingent valuation study of Norwegian public libraries. New library world, 106(1218/1219) 487495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of Law Libraries (2015) Economic Value of Law Libraries <https://www.aallnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/EconomicValue-ofLawLibrariesFinalReport.pdf>..>Google Scholar
British Library (2004), Measuring our value available from http://www.bl.uk/pdf/measuringourvalue.pdf.Google Scholar
Chung, Hye-Kyung (2007), Measuring the economic value of special libraries. The bottom line: managing library finances 20(1), 3044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claesson, Stefan (2011), The value and valuation of maritime cultural heritage. International journal of cultural property 18(1), 6180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hájek, Petr and Stejskal, Jan (2015), Modelling public library value using the contingent valuation method: the case of the Municipal Library of Prague. Journal of librarianship and information science 47(1), 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harless, D. W., and Allen, F. R. (1999) Using the contingent valuation method to measure patron benefits of reference desk service in an academic library. College and Research Libraries 60 (1) 5669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernon, P. and Altman, , Assessing service quality: satisfying the expectations of library customers. (3rd ed. ed. London: Facet Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Hider, Philip (2008), How much are technical services worth? Library resources and technical services 52(4) 254262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Mat and Beale, Noel (2005), Customer surveys in UK merger cases – the art and science of asking the right people the right questions. European competition law review 26(5), 297303.Google Scholar
Kwak, So-Yoon, and Yoo, Seung-Hoon (2012) The public value of a national library: results of a contingent valuation survey. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 44(4) 263271..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachern, Ruth (2001) Measuring the added value of library and information services: the New Zealand approach. IFLA journal 27(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ventura, Roberto (2005) Introduzione alla contingent valuation. An introduction to contingent valuation. Biblioteche Oggi, 23(7).Google Scholar
Yao, Li, Hui-ling, Ren, and Qin, Zhou (2016) Contingent valuation method-based assessment of hospital library value. Zhonghua Yi Xue Tu Shu Qing Bao Za Zhi = Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science, 25(1).Google Scholar