Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:09:20.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Life and Death Choices after Cruzan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2021

Larry Gostin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This issue of Law, Medicine & Health Care on life or death choices, so skillfully put together by Alexander Capron and based on ASLM's conference last September chaired by Professor Capron and Joanne Lynn, grew out of the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.

At the time of the Supreme Court decision Nancy Cruzan was in a persistent vegetative state (PVS), a condition in which a person exhibits motor-reflexes but evinces no indications of significant cognitive function. Nancy Cruzan's biological existence was being sustained by the provision of technological feeding and hydration. Hospital employees refused, without court approval, to honor her parents’ request to withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 19 , Issue 1-2 , Spring Summer 1991 , pp. 9 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

110 S.Ct. 2841 (1990).Google Scholar
American Medical Association, “Persistent Vegetative State and the Decision to Withdraw or Withhold Life Support,” Journal of the American Medical Association 1990 263:489–493.Google Scholar
New York Times, June 27, 1990, p. 22.Google Scholar
E.g., Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel, Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942).Google Scholar
Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 321 (1982); Mills v. Rodgers, 457 U.S.291 (1982).Google Scholar
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, op cit.Google Scholar
National Treasury Employer Union v. Von Raab, 109 S.Ct. 1384 (1989).Google Scholar
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives Association, 109 S.Ct. 1402 (1989).Google Scholar
Washington v. Harper, 110 S.Ct. 1028 (1990).Google Scholar
Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S.11 (1905).Google Scholar
Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979).Google Scholar
The Supreme Court, however, was careful to observe that in Nancy Cruzan's case the state was paying for the costs of her continued treatment. The Court did not indicate, however, that it would have altered its decisions if the family were bearing the financial burden.Google Scholar
The New York Health Care Agents and Proxy Law of 1990 overturns the state judicial determination requiring clear and convincing evidence by allowing appointed proxies to make substitute decisions.Google Scholar
McCrary, S.V. Botkin, J.R., “Hospital Policy on Advance Directives,” Journal of the American Medical Association 1989, 262:2411–14; Emanuel, L. Emanuel, E., “The Medical Directive: A New Comprehensive Advance Care Document,” Journal of the American Medical Association 1989, 261:3288.Google Scholar
Cruzan v, Director, Missouri Department of Health, op cit.Google Scholar
In re O’Connor, 72 N.Y.2d 517, 551 (1988) (Simons J, dissenting).Google Scholar
Schucking, E.L., “Death at a New York Hospital,” Law, Medicine & Health Care 1985, 13:261–68.Google Scholar
The implementation date of the Act is December 1, 1991.Google Scholar
Danforth, J.C., “Opening Statement to Subcommittee on Medicare and Long-term Care of the Committee on Finance Hearing on the Patient Self-Determination Act,” July 20, 1990.Google Scholar