Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T02:09:36.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In-House Hospital Law Offices: How Healthy are They?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Extract

Medical centers. with increasing frequency, are employing their own in-house attorneys. The express purpose for this is to avoid the cost of large corporate law firms, as well as to secure greater control over costs connected with medical malpractice litigation, such as loss control, risk management, and self-insurance programs. But are these offices appropriately and competently providing the full spectrum of legal services to the medical centers they serve?

This past spring, a conference in Chicago explored the role of in-house counsel in controlling corporate legal costs. The general consensus was that corporate clients, who consume from 65 to 85 percent of the legal services in the country, have allowed themselves to be “cowed by the demands of prestigious outside counsel.” According to press reports, ineffectual in-house counsel were criticized for their inability to curb excessive corporate legal fees and expenditures. The legal fees of outside firms were characterized as “just plain unnecessary.”

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corporate Leaders Assail Legal Costs, Litigious Attitudes, Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, April 2, 1982, at 1.Google Scholar
1981-1982 Annual Survey: Compensation of Attorneys in 10 Cities (Catalyst Legal Resources, Inc., New York) (1982).Google Scholar