Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:50:21.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examination on Discovery of “Death at a New York Hospital”: Searching for the Governing Values, Policies, and Attitudes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Somerville, M. A., Refusal of Medical Treatment in “Captive” Circumstances, Canadian Bar Review 63(1): 59 (March 1985).Google ScholarPubMed
Barber, B. et al., Research on Human Subjects: Problems of Social Control in Medical Experimentation (Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1973), at 30.Google Scholar
Jonas, H., Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects, Experimentation with Human Subjects (ed. Freund, P.) (Brazilier, New York, 1970), at 1.Google Scholar
A physician might refrain from saving a life that could be saved if, for example, the patient's religious beliefs lead him or her to refuse treatment.Google Scholar
Legal documents are usually perceived as instruments of cold, hard reality, needed because they govern relationships between strangers, not intimates (see C. Gilligan, New Maps of Development: New Visions of Maturity, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 52[2]: 199 [1982]; Toulmin, S., Equity and Principles, Osgoode Hall Law Journal 20[1]: 1 [March 1982]). Yet perhaps testamentary wills and marriage contracts could, ideally, also be characterized, like the living will and the durable power of attorney, as instruments of love and trust.Google Scholar