Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:35:37.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Empirical Assessment of Innovation in the Law of Civil Commitment: A Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Paul S. Appelbaum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of commitment law in the United States has been marked by a series of pendular swings corresponding to popular concerns of the day. From the inception of civil commitment law in the 1830s and 1840s. with a system in which discretion was lodged primarily in family members and physicians, there have been moves to restrict the ease of commitment when concerns about inappropriate admissions or institutional abuses were at their height (e.g., in the 1870s, 1930s, and 1970s) and countervailing efforts to increase the ease of commitment when concerns about the ready availability of treatment predominated (e.g., around the turn of the century and in the 1950s).

Students of the history of civil commitment will quickly recognize that these shifts in policy were based almost entirely on theoretical arguments about the relative desirability of one or the other approach, fueled by horror stories illustrating the pitfalls of the competing orientation.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , December 1985 , pp. 304 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See Appelbaum, P.S., Civil Commitment in Psychiatry, vol. 3: Epidemiology, Legal, and Social Psychiatry (ed. Michels, R.) (Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1985).Google Scholar
National Institute of Mental Health, A Draft Act Governing the Hospitalization of the Mentally Ill (Public Health Service Publication No. 51) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1952).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Wexler, D.B. Scoville, S.E., The Administration of Psychiatric Justice: Theory and Practice in Arizona, Arizona Law Review 13: 1, 5–144 (1971); Contemporary Studies Project, Facts and Fallacies about Iowa Commitment, Iowa Law Review 55(4): 895 (April 1970).Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P.S., Standards for Civil Commitment: A Critical Review of Empirical Research, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 7(2): 133, 141–3 (1984).Google ScholarPubMed
Appelbaum, P.S., Civil Commitment: Is the Pendulum Changing Direction? Hospital & Community Psychiatry 33(9): 703 (September 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
In addition to the articles cited in notes 7-23 and 28, I have used the following studies: Wanck, B., Two Decades of Involuntary Hospitalization Legislation, American Journal of Psychiatry 141(1): 33 (January 1984);Bonovitz, J.S. Bonovitz, J.C., Emergency Detention of the Mentally Ill, Journal of Psychiatry and Law 9: 423 (1981); Lamb, H.R. Sorkin, A.P. Zusman, J., Legislating Social Control of the Mentally Ill in California, American Journal of Psychiatry 138(3): 334 (March 1981)Bonovitz, J.C. Bonovitz, J.S., Diversion of the Mentally Ill into the Criminal Justice System: The Police Intervention Perspective, American Journal of Psychiatry 138(7): 973 (July 1981); Haupt, D.N. Ehrlich, S.M., The Impact of a New State Commitment Law on Psychiatric Patient Careers, Hospital & Community Psychiatry 31: 745–751 (1980); Bonovitz, J.C. Guy, E.B., Impact of Restrictive Civil Commitment Procedures on a Prison Psychiatric Service, American Journal of Psychiatry 136(8): 1045 (August 1979).Google ScholarPubMed
Monahan, J. Ruggiero, M. Friedlander, H.D., Stone-Roth Model of Civil Commitment and the California Dangerousness Standard: Operational Comparison, Archives of General Psychiatry 39(11): 1267 (November 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
Zander, T.K., Civil Commitment in Wisconsin: The Impact of Lessard v. Schmidt, Wisconsin Law Review 1976(2): 503.Google Scholar
Munetz, M.R. Kaufman, K.R. Rich, C. L., Modernization of a Mental Health Act: I. Commitment Patterns, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 8(4): 83, 91–92 (1980).Google ScholarPubMed
Frydman, L.L., Effects of Psychiatric Legislation: An Example from Kansas, Journal of Psychiatry and Law 8(1): 73 (Spring 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarry, A.L., Statewide Statistical Impact: Old Statute vs. New Statute, in Civil Commitment and Social Policy: An Evaluation of the Massachusetts Mental Health Reform Act (ed. McGarry, A.L. et al.) (NIMH, Rockville, Md., 1981).Google Scholar
ENKI Research Institute, A Study of California's New Mental Health Law (1969–1971) (ENKI Corporation, Los Angeles, 1972).Google Scholar
McGarry, , supra note 11.Google Scholar
Luckey, J.W. Berman, J.J., Effects of a New Commitment Law on Involuntary Admissions and Service Utilization Patterns, Law and Human Behavior 3(3): 149–61 (1979).Google Scholar
See Frydman, , supra note 10.Google Scholar
Miller, R.D. Fiddleman, P.B., Involuntary Civil Commitment in North Carolina: The Result of the 1979 Statutory Changes, North Carolina Law Review 60(5): 985 (June 1982).Google Scholar
Geller, J.L. Lister, E.D., The Process of Criminal Commitment for Pretrial Psychiatric Examination: An Evaluation, American Journal of Psychiatry 135(1): 53 (January 1978).Google ScholarPubMed
See Luckey and Berman, supra note 14.Google Scholar
See Frydman, supra note 10.Google Scholar
Munetz, Kaufman, and Rich, supra note 9.Google Scholar
Hoening, J. Sreenivasan, U. Leiberman, D., The Impact of Mental Health Legislation on Psychiatric Services, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5(3/4): 377 (1982).Google Scholar
McGarry, supra note 11; Luckey and Berman, supra note 14, at 159.Google Scholar
Hoening, Sreenivasan, and Leiberman, supra note 21, at 379-81; Durham, M. Pierce, G.L., Beyond Deinstitutionalization: A Commitment Law in Evolution, Hospital & Community Psychiatry 33(3): 216, 219 (March 1982).Google Scholar
For an example of a study that attempted to collect such data, see ENKI Research Institute, supra note 12.Google Scholar
Faulkner, L.R. et al, The Effect of Mental Health System Changes on Civil Commitment, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 13(4): 345 (1985).Google ScholarPubMed
See Shuman, D.W. Weiner, M.F., The Privilege Study: An Empirical Examination of the Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege, North Carolina Law Review 60(5): 893, 907–17 (June 1982).Google ScholarPubMed
Caper, P. Blumenthal, D., What Price Cost Control? Massachusetts' New Hospital Payment Law, New England Journal of Medicine 308(9): 542–44 (March 3, 1983); Office of Economic Opportunity, Preliminary Results of the New Jersey Graduated Work Incentive Experiment (OEO, Washington, D.C., 1970).Google ScholarPubMed
Durham and Pierce, supra note 23.Google Scholar